BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31670539)

  • 1. Comparing estimators for latent interaction models under structural and distributional misspecifications.
    Brandt H; Umbach N; Kelava A; Bollen KA
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Jun; 25(3):321-345. PubMed ID: 31670539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Model Implied Instrumental Variables (MIIVs): An Alternative Orientation to Structural Equation Modeling.
    Bollen KA
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 30222004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ROBUSTNESS CONDITIONS FOR MIIV-2SLS WHEN THE LATENT VARIABLE OR MEASUREMENT MODEL IS STRUCTURALLY MISSPECIFIED.
    Bollen KA; Gates KM; Fisher Z
    Struct Equ Modeling; 2018; 25(6):848-859. PubMed ID: 30573943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A unified model-implied instrumental variable approach for structural equation modeling with mixed variables.
    Jin S; Yang-Wallentin F; Bollen KA
    Psychometrika; 2021 Jun; 86(2):564-594. PubMed ID: 34097200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An introduction to model implied instrumental variables using two stage least squares (MIIV-2SLS) in structural equation models (SEMs).
    Bollen KA; Fisher ZF; Giordano ML; Lilly AG; Luo L; Ye A
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Oct; 27(5):752-772. PubMed ID: 34323584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Model-implied instrumental variable-generalized method of moments (MIIV-GMM) estimators for latent variable models.
    Bollen KA; Kolenikov S; Bauldry S
    Psychometrika; 2014 Jan; 79(1):20-50. PubMed ID: 24532165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Instrumental Variable (IV) Tests to Evaluate Model Specification in Latent Variable Structural Equation Models.
    Kirby JB; Bollen KA
    Sociol Methodol; 2009 Jul; 39(1):327-355. PubMed ID: 20419054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Instrumental Variable Estimator for Mixed Indicators: Analytic Derivatives and Alternative Parameterizations.
    Fisher ZF; Bollen KA
    Psychometrika; 2020 Sep; 85(3):660-683. PubMed ID: 32833145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Latent variable GIMME using model implied instrumental variables (MIIVs).
    Gates KM; Fisher ZF; Bollen KA
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):227-242. PubMed ID: 31246041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Impact of Specification Error on the Estimation, Testing, and Improvement of Structural Equation Models.
    Kaplan D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1988 Jan; 23(1):69-86. PubMed ID: 26782258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating and Testing Random Intercept Multilevel Structural Equation Models with Model Implied Instrumental Variables.
    Giordano ML; Bollen KA; Jin S
    Struct Equ Modeling; 2022; 29(4):584-599. PubMed ID: 37333803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How the 2SLS/IV estimator can handle equality constraints in structural equation models: a system-of-equations approach.
    Nestler S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 May; 67(2):353-69. PubMed ID: 24033324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Autoregressive mediation models using composite scores and latent variables: Comparisons and recommendations.
    Zhang Q; Yang Y
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):472-495. PubMed ID: 32271042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Monte Carlo study comparing PIV, ULS and DWLS in the estimation of dichotomous confirmatory factor analysis.
    Nestler S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):127-43. PubMed ID: 22524532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normality assumption in latent interaction models.
    Lonati S; Rönkkö M; Antonakis J
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38573667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The accuracy of reliability coefficients: A reanalysis of existing simulations.
    Cho E
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):331-349. PubMed ID: 35084890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are fit indices used to test psychopathology structure biased? A simulation study.
    Greene AL; Eaton NR; Li K; Forbes MK; Krueger RF; Markon KE; Waldman ID; Cicero DC; Conway CC; Docherty AR; Fried EI; Ivanova MY; Jonas KG; Latzman RD; Patrick CJ; Reininghaus U; Tackett JL; Wright AGC; Kotov R
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2019 Oct; 128(7):740-764. PubMed ID: 31318246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Latent Variable Interactions With Ordered-Categorical Indicators: Comparisons of Unconstrained Product Indicator and Latent Moderated Structural Equations Approaches.
    Aytürk E; Cham H; Jennings PA; Brown JL
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Apr; 80(2):262-292. PubMed ID: 32158022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Croon's Bias-Corrected Estimation for Multilevel Structural Equation Models with Non-Normal Indicators and Model Misspecifications.
    Cox K; Kelcey B
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Feb; 83(1):48-72. PubMed ID: 36601256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.
    Enders CK
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 11778677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.