BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

842 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31672536)

  • 1. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Surgical-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials and Propensity-Matched Studies.
    Rawasia WF; Usman MS; Mujeeb FA; Zafar M; Khan SU; Alkhouli M
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 May; 21(5):612-618. PubMed ID: 31672536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk: A meta-analysis of randomized trials and propensity score matched observational studies.
    Witberg G; Lador A; Yahav D; Kornowski R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):408-416. PubMed ID: 29388308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk surgical patients: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Kheiri B; Osman M; Abubakar H; Subahi A; Chahine A; Ahmed S; Bachuwa G; Alkotob ML; Hassan M; Bhatt DL
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Oct; 20(10):838-842. PubMed ID: 30638890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cardiovascular Outcomes with Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Kundu A; Sardar P; Malhotra R; Qureshi WT; Kakouros N
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):453-460. PubMed ID: 31669113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term survival after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: A meta-analysis of observational comparative studies with a propensity-score analysis.
    Takagi H; Mitta S; Ando T;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):419-430. PubMed ID: 29388316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Swift SL; Puehler T; Misso K; Lang SH; Forbes C; Kleijnen J; Danner M; Kuhn C; Haneya A; Seoudy H; Cremer J; Frey N; Lutter G; Wolff R; Scheibler F; Wehkamp K; Frank D
    BMJ Open; 2021 Dec; 11(12):e054222. PubMed ID: 34873012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk.
    Kolkailah AA; Doukky R; Pelletier MP; Volgman AS; Kaneko T; Nabhan AF
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Dec; 12(12):CD013319. PubMed ID: 31860123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis patients at low to moderate surgical risk: a comprehensive meta-analysis.
    Elmaraezy A; Ismail A; Abushouk AI; Eltoomy M; Saad S; Negida A; Abdelaty OM; Abdallah AR; Aboelfotoh AM; Hassan HM; Elmaraezy AG; Morsi M; Althaher F; Althaher M; AlSafadi AM
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Aug; 17(1):234. PubMed ID: 28836953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Al-Abdouh A; Upadhrasta S; Fashanu O; Elias H; Zhao D; Hasan RK; Michos ED
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):461-466. PubMed ID: 31447314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A meta-analysis of ≥5-year mortality after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Takagi H; Hari Y; Nakashima K; Kuno T; Ando T;
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2020 Feb; 61(1):107-116. PubMed ID: 31666501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low and intermediate risk: A risk specific meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Fang F; Tang J; Zhao Y; He J; Xu P; Faramand A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221922. PubMed ID: 31550263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sutureless versus transcatheter aortic valves in elderly patients with aortic stenosis at intermediate risk: A multi-institutional study.
    Muneretto C; Solinas M; Folliguet T; Di Bartolomeo R; Repossini A; Laborde F; Rambaldini M; Santarpino G; Di Bacco L; Fischlein T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Mar; 163(3):925-935.e5. PubMed ID: 32727681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: an updated meta-analysis.
    Siontis GCM; Overtchouk P; Cahill TJ; Modine T; Prendergast B; Praz F; Pilgrim T; Petrinic T; Nikolakopoulou A; Salanti G; Søndergaard L; Verma S; Jüni P; Windecker S
    Eur Heart J; 2019 Oct; 40(38):3143-3153. PubMed ID: 31329852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In-hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in non-teaching hospitals.
    Ando T; Adegbala O; Villablanca PA; Briasoulis A; Takagi H; Grines CL; Schreiber T; Nazif T; Kodali S; Afonso L
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 93(5):954-962. PubMed ID: 30408309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-surgical-risk patients: An updated meta-analysis.
    Goel S; Pasam RT; Wats K; Patel J; Chava S; Gotesman J; Malik BA; Frankel R; Shani J; Gidwani U
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 96(1):169-178. PubMed ID: 31631514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-analysis of transfemoral TAVR versus surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Arora S; Vaidya SR; Strassle PD; Misenheimer JA; Rhodes JA; Ramm CJ; Wheeler EN; Caranasos TG; Cavender MA; Vavalle JP
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 91(4):806-812. PubMed ID: 29068166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk.
    Witberg G; Landes U; Lador A; Yahav D; Kornowski R
    EuroIntervention; 2019 Dec; 15(12):e1047-e1056. PubMed ID: 31566571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low-Risk Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement - An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Anantha-Narayanan M; Kandasamy VV; Reddy YN; Megaly M; Baskaran J; Pershad A; Suri RM; Garcia S
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):441-452. PubMed ID: 31678116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Echocardiographic outcomes from seven randomized trials of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Takagi H; Hari Y; Nakashima K; Kuno T; Ando T;
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2020 Jan; 21(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 31764238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.
    Elbadawi A; Saad M; Elgendy IY; Barssoum K; Omer MA; Soliman A; Almahmoud MF; Ogunbayo GO; Mentias A; Gilani S; Jneid H; Aronow HD; Kleiman N; Abbott JD
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Sep; 12(18):1811-1822. PubMed ID: 31537280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.