201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31673038)
1. Molecular harvesting with electroporation for tissue profiling.
Golberg A; Sheviryov J; Solomon O; Anavy L; Yakhini Z
Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):15750. PubMed ID: 31673038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Calcein Release from Cells In Vitro via Reversible and Irreversible Electroporation.
Rajeckaitė V; Jakštys B; Rafanavičius A; Maciulevičius M; Jakutavičiūtė M; Šatkauskas S
J Membr Biol; 2018 Feb; 251(1):119-130. PubMed ID: 29143077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhancing the effectiveness of drug-based cancer therapy by electroporation (electropermeabilization).
Rabussay DP; Nanda GS; Goldfarb PM
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2002 Feb; 1(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 12614180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo silencing of a molecular target by short interfering RNA electroporation: tumor vascularization correlates to delivery efficiency.
Takei Y; Nemoto T; Mu P; Fujishima T; Ishimoto T; Hayakawa Y; Yuzawa Y; Matsuo S; Muramatsu T; Kadomatsu K
Mol Cancer Ther; 2008 Jan; 7(1):211-21. PubMed ID: 18202023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nondestructive protein sampling with electroporation facilitates profiling of spatial differential protein expression in breast tumors in vivo.
Vitkin E; Singh A; Wise J; Ben-Elazar S; Yakhini Z; Golberg A
Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15835. PubMed ID: 36151122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficiency of high- and low-voltage pulse combinations for gene electrotransfer in muscle, liver, tumor, and skin.
André FM; Gehl J; Sersa G; Préat V; Hojman P; Eriksen J; Golzio M; Cemazar M; Pavselj N; Rols MP; Miklavcic D; Neumann E; Teissié J; Mir LM
Hum Gene Ther; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1261-71. PubMed ID: 19866490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Current density imaging sequence for monitoring current distribution during delivery of electric pulses in irreversible electroporation.
Serša I; Kranjc M; Miklavčič D
Biomed Eng Online; 2015; 14 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S6. PubMed ID: 26356233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hepatocyte-targeted gene transfer by combination of vascularly delivered plasmid DNA and in vivo electroporation.
Sakai M; Nishikawa M; Thanaketpaisarn O; Yamashita F; Hashida M
Gene Ther; 2005 Apr; 12(7):607-16. PubMed ID: 15616599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Normal and Malignant Cells Exhibit Differential Responses to Calcium Electroporation.
Frandsen SK; Krüger MB; Mangalanathan UM; Tramm T; Mahmood F; Novak I; Gehl J
Cancer Res; 2017 Aug; 77(16):4389-4401. PubMed ID: 28760856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy and mechanism of steep pulse irreversible electroporation technology on xenograft model of nude mice: a preclinical study.
Song Z; Xu X; Liu M; Liu J; Chen J; Li C; Yao C; Zhou Q
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 16(1):84. PubMed ID: 29695251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimizing in vivo gene transfer into mouse corpus cavernosum by use of surface electroporation.
Song KM; Choi MJ; Kwon MH; Ghatak K; Park SH; Ryu DS; Ryu JK; Suh JK
Korean J Urol; 2015 Mar; 56(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 25763123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo liver electroporation: optimization and demonstration of therapeutic efficacy.
Jaichandran S; Yap ST; Khoo AB; Ho LP; Tien SL; Kon OL
Hum Gene Ther; 2006 Mar; 17(3):362-75. PubMed ID: 16544985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Synergistic combinations of short high-voltage pulses and long low-voltage pulses enhance irreversible electroporation efficacy.
Yao C; Lv Y; Zhao Y; Dong S; Liu H; Ma J
Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15123. PubMed ID: 29123231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct visualization of electroporation-assisted in vivo gene delivery to tumors using intravital microscopy - spatial and time dependent distribution.
Cemazar M; Wilson I; Dachs GU; Tozer GM; Sersa G
BMC Cancer; 2004 Nov; 4():81. PubMed ID: 15546484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of thermal injury to liver, pancreas and kidney during irreversible electroporation in an in vivo experimental model.
Dunki-Jacobs EM; Philips P; Martin RC
Br J Surg; 2014 Aug; 101(9):1113-21. PubMed ID: 24961953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electroporation-enhanced gene delivery in mammary tumors.
Wells JM; Li LH; Sen A; Jahreis GP; Hui SW
Gene Ther; 2000 Apr; 7(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 10819568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Avoiding neuromuscular stimulation in liver irreversible electroporation using radiofrequency electric fields.
Castellví Q; Mercadal B; Moll X; Fondevila D; Andaluz A; Ivorra A
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035027. PubMed ID: 29235992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electroporation increases antitumoral efficacy of the bcl-2 antisense G3139 and chemotherapy in a human melanoma xenograft.
Spugnini EP; Biroccio A; De Mori R; Scarsella M; D'Angelo C; Baldi A; Leonetti C
J Transl Med; 2011 Jul; 9():125. PubMed ID: 21798045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modeling of electric field distribution in tissues during electroporation.
Corovic S; Lackovic I; Sustaric P; Sustar T; Rodic T; Miklavcic D
Biomed Eng Online; 2013 Feb; 12():16. PubMed ID: 23433433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A flexible microneedle array as low-voltage electroporation electrodes for in vivo DNA and siRNA delivery.
Wei Z; Zheng S; Wang R; Bu X; Ma H; Wu Y; Zhu L; Hu Z; Liang Z; Li Z
Lab Chip; 2014 Oct; 14(20):4093-102. PubMed ID: 25182174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
