129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31674213)
1. Developing a Priority Scoring Index for Mobile Mammography Sites: Considerations for Screening Access in Rural and Remote Settings.
Mitchell EM; Camacho F
Cancer Control; 2019; 26(1):1073274819883270. PubMed ID: 31674213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do Appalachian women attending a mobile mammography program differ from those visiting a stationary mammography facility?
Vyas A; Madhavan S; Kelly K; Metzger A; Schreiman J; Remick S
J Community Health; 2013 Aug; 38(4):698-706. PubMed ID: 23504266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mobile Mammography Participation Among Medically Underserved Women: A Systematic Review.
Vang S; Margolies LR; Jandorf L
Prev Chronic Dis; 2018 Nov; 15():E140. PubMed ID: 30447104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A catchment and location-allocation analysis of mammography access in Delaware, US: implications for disparities in geographic access to breast cancer screening.
Webster JL; Goldstein ND; Rowland JP; Tuite CM; Siegel SD
Breast Cancer Res; 2023 Nov; 25(1):137. PubMed ID: 37941020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do mobile units contribute to spatial accessibility to mammography for uninsured women?
Hughes AE; Lee SC; Eberth JM; Berry E; Pruitt SL
Prev Med; 2020 Sep; 138():106156. PubMed ID: 32473958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of a Mobile Mammography Program.
Stanley E; Lewis MC; Irshad A; Ackerman S; Collins H; Pavic D; Leddy RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1426-1429. PubMed ID: 28871806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer stage at diagnosis and geographic access to mammography screening (New Hampshire, 1998-2004).
Celaya MO; Berke EM; Onega TL; Gui J; Riddle BL; Cherala SS; Rees JR
Rural Remote Health; 2010; 10(2):1361. PubMed ID: 20438282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "Don't know" and accuracy of breast cancer risk perceptions among Appalachian women attending a mobile mammography program: implications for educational interventions and patient empowerment.
LeMasters T; Madhavan S; Atkins E; Vyas A; Remick S; Vona-Davis L
J Cancer Educ; 2014 Dec; 29(4):669-79. PubMed ID: 24563177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Could mobile mammography reduce social and geographic inequalities in breast cancer screening participation?
Guillaume E; Launay L; Dejardin O; Bouvier V; Guittet L; Déan P; Notari A; De Mil R; Launoy G
Prev Med; 2017 Jul; 100():84-88. PubMed ID: 28408217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Mobile Mammography Unit for Breast Cancer Screening to Reduce Geographic and Social Health Inequalities.
De Mil R; Guillaume E; Launay L; Guittet L; Dejardin O; Bouvier V; Notari A; Launoy G; Berchi C
Value Health; 2019 Oct; 22(10):1111-1118. PubMed ID: 31563253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rural-Urban Disparities in Access to Breast Cancer Screening: A Spatial Clustering Analysis.
Chandak A; Nayar P; Lin G
J Rural Health; 2019 Mar; 35(2):229-235. PubMed ID: 29888497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Is “mobile mammography” a Relevant Method in France?].
Vallée A
Sante Publique; 2016 Nov; 28(5):599-602. PubMed ID: 28155735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Availability of prior mammograms affects incomplete report rates in mobile screening mammography.
Roubidoux MA; Shih-Pei Wu P; Nolte ELR; Begay JA; Joe AI
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Oct; 171(3):667-673. PubMed ID: 29951970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammograms on-the-go-predictors of repeat visits to mobile mammography vans in St Louis, Missouri, USA: a case-control study.
Drake BF; Abadin SS; Lyons S; Chang SH; Steward LT; Kraenzle S; Goodman MS
BMJ Open; 2015 Mar; 5(3):e006960. PubMed ID: 25795693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammography-based screening program: preliminary results from a first 2-year round in a Brazilian region using mobile and fixed units.
Haikel RL; Mauad EC; Silva TB; Mattos JS; Chala LF; Longatto-Filho A; de Barros N
BMC Womens Health; 2012 Oct; 12():32. PubMed ID: 23031787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient compliance in mobile screening mammography.
Pisano ED; Yankaskas BC; Ghate SV; Plankey MW; Morgan JT
Acad Radiol; 1995 Dec; 2(12):1067-72. PubMed ID: 9419684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors influencing adherence to mammography screening guidelines in Appalachian women participating in a mobile mammography program.
Vyas A; Madhavan S; LeMasters T; Atkins E; Gainor S; Kennedy S; Kelly K; Vona-Davis L; Remick S
J Community Health; 2012 Jun; 37(3):632-46. PubMed ID: 22033614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identifying key barriers to effective breast cancer control in rural settings.
Sprague BL; Ahern TP; Herschorn SD; Sowden M; Weaver DL; Wood ME
Prev Med; 2021 Nov; 152(Pt 2):106741. PubMed ID: 34302837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Catchment and Location-Allocation Analysis of Mammography Access in Delaware, US: Implications for disparities in geographic access to breast cancer screening.
Webster JL; Goldstein ND; Rowland JR; Tuite CM; Siegel SD
Res Sq; 2023 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 36909545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. From high tech to high touch: integrating community voices in mobile mammography outreach.
Kennedy S; Stephens S; Tephabock K; Brown P; Davis P; Keresztury J; Narsavage G
W V Med J; 2009 Oct; 105 Spec No():74-7. PubMed ID: 19999271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
