These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31674336)

  • 1. Exploring the origin of sentencing disparities in the Crown Court: Using text mining techniques to differentiate between court and judge disparities.
    Pina-Sánchez J; Grech D; Brunton-Smith I; Sferopoulos D
    Soc Sci Res; 2019 Nov; 84():102343. PubMed ID: 31674336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corrigendum to "Exploring the origin of sentencing disparities in the Crown Court: Using text mining techniques to differentiate between court and judge disparities" [Soc. Sci. Res. 84C (2019) 102343].
    Pina-Sánchez J; Grech D; Brunton-Smith I; Sferopoulos D
    Soc Sci Res; 2020 Jan; 85():102371. PubMed ID: 31789202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crime and punishment in Saudi Arabia: Lashing, imprisonment, and other unusual punishments.
    Boateng FD; Pryce DK; Alotaibi HA
    Child Abuse Negl; 2023 Jan; 135():105948. PubMed ID: 36395699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do moral intuitions influence judges' sentencing decisions? A multilevel study of criminal court sentencing in Pennsylvania.
    Silver E; Ulmer JT; Silver JR
    Soc Sci Res; 2023 Sep; 115():102927. PubMed ID: 37858364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Judicial sentencing considerations in cases of violent offenders versus sexual offenders.
    Butrus N
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(5):653-674. PubMed ID: 31984044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Court diversion in perspective.
    James DV
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2006; 40(6-7):529-38. PubMed ID: 16756577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contextual Influences on the Sentencing of Individuals Convicted of Sexual Crimes.
    Thompson L; Rydberg J; Cassidy M; Socia KM
    Sex Abuse; 2020 Oct; 32(7):778-805. PubMed ID: 31154899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sentencing, Domestic Violence, and the Overrepresentation of Indigenous Australians: Does Court Location Matter?
    Fitzgerald R; Douglas H; Heybroek L
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 Nov; 36(21-22):10588-10613. PubMed ID: 31702403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revisiting the Decision of Death in Hurst v. Florida.
    Cooke BK; Ginory A; Zedalis J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2016 Dec; 44(4):483-490. PubMed ID: 28003393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inter-judicial differences in approaching technical violations: Examining the interaction of judge and compliance issue for domestic violence probationers.
    Romain Dagenhardt DM; Freiburger TL
    Behav Sci Law; 2022 Nov; 40(6):818-834. PubMed ID: 36050823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does Having a Minor Child Affect Criminal Charges and Sanctions Imposed on Female Defendants?
    Sloan FA; Gifford EJ; Evans KE; Eldred LM
    Women Crim Justice; 2021; 31(2):108-129. PubMed ID: 34025020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. JUSTFAIR: Judicial System Transparency through Federal Archive Inferred Records.
    Ciocanel MV; Topaz CM; Santorella R; Sen S; Smith CM; Hufstetler A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0241381. PubMed ID: 33104748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring methods to investigate sentencing decisions.
    Merrall EL; Dhami MK; Bird SM
    Eval Rev; 2010 Jun; 34(3):185-219. PubMed ID: 20479212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptions of domestic violence and mock jurors' sentencing decisions.
    Kern R; Libkuman TM; Temple SL
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1515-35. PubMed ID: 17993639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brief Report: Judicial Attitudes Regarding the Sentencing of Offenders with High Functioning Autism.
    Berryessa CM
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2016 Aug; 46(8):2770-2773. PubMed ID: 27106568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk and resources: A qualitative perspective on low-level sentencing in Virginia.
    Metz A; Monahan J; Garrett B; Siebert L
    J Community Psychol; 2019 Jul; 47(6):1476-1492. PubMed ID: 31090080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The burgeoning recognition and accommodation of the social supply of drugs in international criminal justice systems: An eleven-nation comparative overview.
    Coomber R; Moyle L; Belackova V; Decorte T; Hakkarainen P; Hathaway A; Laidler KJ; Lenton S; Murphy S; Scott J; Stefunkova M; van de Ven K; Vlaemynck M; Werse B
    Int J Drug Policy; 2018 Aug; 58():93-103. PubMed ID: 29890504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring the Effects of Court Dispositions on Future Domestic Violence Offending: An Analysis of Two Specialized Domestic Violence Courts.
    Pinchevsky GM
    J Interpers Violence; 2017 Feb; 32(4):558-580. PubMed ID: 26021860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychological reports for sentencing juveniles in Australian courts.
    Bycroft D; Dear GE; Drake D
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2019; 26(3):355-374. PubMed ID: 31984082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk assessment in sentencing and plea bargaining: The roles of prosecutors and defense attorneys.
    Monahan J; Metz A; Garrett BL; Jakubow A
    Behav Sci Law; 2020 Jan; 38(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 31797449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.