468 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31674857)
1. PICC-PORT totally implantable vascular access device in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Bertoglio S; Cafiero F; Meszaros P; Varaldo E; Blondeaux E; Molinelli C; Minuto M
J Vasc Access; 2020 Jul; 21(4):460-466. PubMed ID: 31674857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implanting totally implantable venous access ports in the upper arm is feasible and safe for patients with early breast cancer.
Xu H; Chen R; Jiang C; You S; Zhu Q; Li Y; Li S; Zha X; Wang J
J Vasc Access; 2020 Sep; 21(5):609-614. PubMed ID: 31841061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in cancer patients under chemotherapy: A prospective study on the incidence of complications and overall failures.
Bertoglio S; Faccini B; Lalli L; Cafiero F; Bruzzi P
J Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 113(6):708-14. PubMed ID: 27020965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Venous access devices for the delivery of long-term chemotherapy: the CAVA three-arm RCT.
Wu O; McCartney E; Heggie R; Germeni E; Paul J; Soulis E; Dillon S; Ryan C; Sim M; Dixon-Hughes J; Agarwal R; Bodenham A; Menne T; Jones B; Moss J
Health Technol Assess; 2021 Jul; 25(47):1-126. PubMed ID: 34318743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy and safety of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in acute cardiac care management.
Poletti F; Coccino C; Monolo D; Crespi P; Ciccioli G; Cordio G; Seveso G; De Servi S
J Vasc Access; 2018 Sep; 19(5):455-460. PubMed ID: 29514546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Centrally inserted tunnelled peripherally inserted central catheter: Off-label use for venous access in oncology patients.
Lingegowda D; Gehani A; Sen S; Mukhopadhyay S; Ghosh P
J Vasc Access; 2020 Sep; 21(5):773-777. PubMed ID: 32133909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical impact of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted port catheters in patients with cancer: an open-label, randomised, two-centre trial.
Taxbro K; Hammarskjöld F; Thelin B; Lewin F; Hagman H; Hanberger H; Berg S
Br J Anaesth; 2019 Jun; 122(6):734-741. PubMed ID: 31005243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transverse incision versus longitudinal incision in the implantation of PICC-port: A before-after study.
Shen Y; Wang Q; Li X; Chang J; Zhou X
J Vasc Access; 2024 May; 25(3):892-896. PubMed ID: 36515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repurposing the power injectable peripherally inserted central catheter as a tunnelled, non-cuffed, centrally inserted central venous catheter in oncological patients for short- to mid-term vascular access: A pilot study.
Low XZ; Tay KH; Leong S; Lo RHG; Zhuang KD; Chua JME; Too CW
J Vasc Access; 2021 May; 22(3):457-461. PubMed ID: 32715861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) versus subcutaneously implanted port-chamber catheters by complication and cost for patients receiving chemotherapy for non-haematological malignancies.
Patel GS; Jain K; Kumar R; Strickland AH; Pellegrini L; Slavotinek J; Eaton M; McLeay W; Price T; Ly M; Ullah S; Koczwara B; Kichenadasse G; Karapetis CS
Support Care Cancer; 2014 Jan; 22(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 24005884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Port catheter versus peripherally inserted central catheter for postoperative chemotherapy in early breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of 448 patients.
Lefebvre L; Noyon E; Georgescu D; Proust V; Alexandru C; Leheurteur M; Thery JC; Savary L; Rigal O; Di Fiore F; Veyret C; Clatot F
Support Care Cancer; 2016 Mar; 24(3):1397-403. PubMed ID: 26342484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The "Arm-to-Chest Tunneling" technique: A modified technique for arm placement of implantable ports or central catheters.
Kehagias E; Tsetis D
J Vasc Access; 2019 Nov; 20(6):771-777. PubMed ID: 30939969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The blind pushing technique for peripherally inserted central catheter placement through brachial vein puncture.
Lee JM; Cho YK; Kim HM; Song MG; Song SY; Yeon JW; Yoon DY; Lee SY
J Vasc Surg; 2018 Mar; 67(3):860-867. PubMed ID: 29153532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device.
Biffi R; Corrado F; de Braud F; de Lucia F; Scarpa D; Testori A; Orsi F; Bellomi M; Mauri S; Aapro M; Andreoni B
Eur J Cancer; 1997 Jul; 33(8):1190-4. PubMed ID: 9301441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Peripherally inserted central catheter-related complications in cancer patients: a prospective study of over 50,000 catheter days.
Kang J; Chen W; Sun W; Ge R; Li H; Ma E; Su Q; Cheng F; Hong J; Zhang Y; Lei C; Wang X; Jin A; Liu W
J Vasc Access; 2017 Mar; 18(2):153-157. PubMed ID: 28218366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comparison Between Upper Arm and Chest for Optimal Site of Totally Implanted Venous Access Ports in Patients with Female Breast Cancer.
Yang SS; Ahn MS
Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Jul; 50():128-134. PubMed ID: 29481918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective randomized comparative evaluation of proximal valve polyurethane and distal valve silicone peripherally inserted central catheters.
Ong CK; Venkatesh SK; Lau GB; Wang SC
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Aug; 21(8):1191-6. PubMed ID: 20598573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters (PICC) versus totally implantable venous access device (PORT) for chemotherapy administration: a meta-analysis on gynecological cancer patients.
Capozzi VA; Monfardini L; Sozzi G; Armano G; Butera D; Scarpelli E; Barresi G; Benegiamo A; Berretta R
Acta Biomed; 2021 Nov; 92(5):e2021257. PubMed ID: 34738565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Late fracture of Groshong ports: A report of the three cases.
Saijo F; Mutoh M; Tokumine J; Yoshinobu O; Hama H; Namima T; Shibahara M; Tokumura H
J Vasc Access; 2019 Sep; 20(5):563-566. PubMed ID: 30854915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A case of unexpected peripherally inserted central catheter removal from a colorectal cancer patient with cetuximab-induced skin toxicity and contact dermatitis at the peripherally inserted central catheter insertion site: Should we recommend the patient to choose subcutaneous port preferentially?
Yang H; Rui Y; Wang G
J Vasc Access; 2021 Mar; 22(2):310-313. PubMed ID: 32167004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
