138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31674903)
1. Charnley femoral cemented stem with a permeable and resorbable cement restrictor and low-viscosity cement - Clinical and radiographical evaluation of 100 cases at a mean follow-up of 6.55 years.
Prudhon JL; Caton JH; Aslanian T
SICOT J; 2019; 5():39. PubMed ID: 31674903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Air permeable diaphyseal obturators: efficacity of femoral cementing and prevention of associated cardiovascular disorders].
Caton J; Prudhon JL; Aslanian T; Lifante JC; Ritz B
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2002 Dec; 88(8):767-76. PubMed ID: 12503018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Femoral fissure after cement restrictor implantation].
Schneider M; Heisel C; Breusch SJ
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(5):554-6. PubMed ID: 14551842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inferior stability of a biodegradable cement plug. 122 total hip replacements randomized to degradable or non-degradable cement restrictor.
Schauss SM; Hinz M; Mayr E; Bach CM; Krismer M; Fischer M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Jul; 126(5):324-9. PubMed ID: 16612619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cement restrictor function below the femoral isthmus.
Moran M; Heisel C; Rupp R; Simpson AH; Breusch SJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 May; 458():111-6. PubMed ID: 17206103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exeter and charnley arthroplasties with Boneloc or high viscosity cement. Comparison of 1,127 arthroplasties followed for 5 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
Furnes O; Lie SA; Havelin LI; Vollset SE; Engesaeter LB
Acta Orthop Scand; 1997 Dec; 68(6):515-20. PubMed ID: 9462347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Cement-within-cement femoral stem reimplantation technique].
Judl T; Jahoda D; Landor I; Pokorný D; Melicherčík P; Sosna A
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):416-22. PubMed ID: 22094155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of a polyglycolide lactide cement plug restrictor in total hip arthroplasty.
Yee AJ; Binnington AG; Hearn T; Protzner K; Fornasier VL; Davey JR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Jul; (364):254-66. PubMed ID: 10416416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up.
Madey SM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak JP; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Jan; 79(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 9010186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved cementing techniques: a minimum twenty-year follow-up study.
Klapach AS; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Olejniczak JP; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Dec; 83(12):1840-8. PubMed ID: 11741064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new femoral cement restrictor.
Paul AS; Hodgkinson JP
J Arthroplasty; 1992; 7 Suppl():411-3. PubMed ID: 1431924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of fixation of the femoral component without cement and fixation with use of a bone-vacuum cementing technique for the prevention of fat embolism during total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Pitto RP; Koessler M; Kuehle JW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jun; 81(6):831-43. PubMed ID: 10391548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty.
Davis CM; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jul; 85(7):1264-9. PubMed ID: 12851351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the cementation of the tibial component in knee arthroplasty : a study of four techniques in the cadaver.
Rodríguez-Collell JR; Mifsut D; Ruiz-Sauri A; Rodríguez-Pino L; González-Soler EM; Valverde-Navarro AA
Bone Joint Res; 2021 Aug; 10(8):467-473. PubMed ID: 34340533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the Wrightington FC hip with the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. 10- to 15-year results and survival analysis.
Sochart DH; Hardinge K
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1998 Jul; 80(4):577-84. PubMed ID: 9699815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of the type of cement on early revision of Charnley total hip prostheses. A review of eight thousand five hundred and seventy-nine primary arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
Havelin LI; Espehaug B; Vollset SE; Engesaeter LB
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Oct; 77(10):1543-50. PubMed ID: 7593063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Periprosthetic femoral fracture due to biodegradable cement restrictor.
Dhawan RK; Mangham DC; Graham NM
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Sep; 27(8):1581.e13-5. PubMed ID: 22521399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of two different types of cement restrictors on the femoral cement mantle.
Faraj AA; Rajasekar K
Acta Orthop Belg; 2006 Dec; 72(6):702-8. PubMed ID: 17260607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cementation in total hip arthroplasty: history, principles, and technique.
Satalich JR; Lombardo DJ; Newman S; Golladay GJ; Patel NK
EFORT Open Rev; 2022 Dec; 7(11):747-757. PubMed ID: 36475555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
