These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31675278)

  • 41. Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology.
    Freeman S; O'Connor E; Parks JW; Cunningham M; Hurley D; Haak D; Dirks C; Wenderoth MP
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 17548875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Teaching neuroanatomy using computer-aided learning: What makes for successful outcomes?
    Svirko E; Mellanby J
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Nov; 10(6):560-569. PubMed ID: 28431201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Embedding Questions During Online Lecture Capture to Promote Learning and Transfer of Knowledge.
    Griswold LA; Overson CE; Benassi VA
    Am J Occup Ther; 2017; 71(3):7103230010p1-7103230010p7. PubMed ID: 28422637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Small-group learning in an upper-level university biology class enhances academic performance and student attitudes toward group work.
    Gaudet AD; Ramer LM; Nakonechny J; Cragg JJ; Ramer MS
    PLoS One; 2010 Dec; 5(12):e15821. PubMed ID: 21209910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Can mixed assessment methods make biology classes more equitable?
    Cotner S; Ballen CJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189610. PubMed ID: 29281676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Daily online testing in large classes: boosting college performance while reducing achievement gaps.
    Pennebaker JW; Gosling SD; Ferrell JD
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e79774. PubMed ID: 24278176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Nursing students collaborating to develop multiple-choice exam revision questions: A student engagement study.
    Craft JA; Christensen M; Shaw N; Bakon S
    Nurse Educ Today; 2017 Dec; 59():6-11. PubMed ID: 28898728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Implementing collaborative, active learning using peer instructions in pharmacology teaching increases students' learning and thereby exam performance.
    Carstensen SS; Kjaer C; Möller S; Bloksgaard M
    Eur J Pharmacol; 2020 Jan; 867():172792. PubMed ID: 31733212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effectiveness of a Low-Cost, Graduate Student-Led Intervention on Study Habits and Performance in Introductory Biology.
    Hoskins TD; Gantz JD; Chaffee BR; Arlinghaus K; Wiebler J; Hughes M; Fernandes JJ
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 28747353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of personal response systems on student perception and academic performance in courses in a health sciences curriculum.
    FitzPatrick KA; Finn KE; Campisi J
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Sep; 35(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 21908838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The impact of blended learning on student performance in a cardiovascular pharmacotherapy course.
    McLaughlin JE; Gharkholonarehe N; Khanova J; Deyo ZM; Rodgers JE
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2015 Mar; 79(2):24. PubMed ID: 25861105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A Biology Core Concept Instrument (BCCI) to Teach and Assess Student Conceptual Understanding.
    Cary TL; Wienhold CJ; Branchaw J
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2019 Sep; 18(3):ar46. PubMed ID: 31469620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53.
    Luckie DB; Hoskinson AM; Griffin CE; Hess AL; Price KJ; Tawa A; Thacker SM
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 28389429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Incorporating clickers into an enzymology course improves student performance.
    Stines-Chaumeil C; Paumard P; Hooks MA
    FEBS Open Bio; 2019 Apr; 9(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 30984532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Articulating scientific reasoning improves student learning in an undergraduate anatomy and physiology course.
    Krontiris-Litowitz J
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2009; 8(4):309-15. PubMed ID: 19952099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The use of a knowledge survey as an indicator of student learning in an introductory biology course.
    Bowers N; Brandon M; Hill CD
    Cell Biol Educ; 2005; 4(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 16341258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Peer learning and support of technology in an undergraduate biology course to enhance deep learning.
    Tsaushu M; Tal T; Sagy O; Kali Y; Gepstein S; Zilberstein D
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2012; 11(4):402-12. PubMed ID: 23222836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effects of testing the relationships among relational concepts.
    Corral D; Healy AF; Jones M
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 May; 7(1):47. PubMed ID: 35639213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Students' studying and approaches to learning in introductory biology.
    Tomanek D; Montplaisir L
    Cell Biol Educ; 2004; 3(4):253-62. PubMed ID: 15592598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Encouragement for Faculty to Implement Vision and Change.
    Harvey C; Eshleman K; Koo K; Smith KG; Paradise CJ; Campbell AM
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2016; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 27810871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.