These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31675343)

  • 41. Psychometric characterization of incidental feedback sources during grasping with a hand prosthesis.
    Wilke MA; Niethammer C; Meyer B; Farina D; Dosen S
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 16(1):155. PubMed ID: 31823792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Haptic Enchanters: Attachable and Detachable Vibrotactile Modules and Their Advantages.
    Park G; Cha H; Choi S
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2019; 12(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 30047899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Short- and Long-Term Learning of Feedforward Control of a Myoelectric Prosthesis with Sensory Feedback by Amputees.
    Strbac M; Isakovic M; Belic M; Popovic I; Simanic I; Farina D; Keller T; Dosen S
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Nov; 25(11):2133-2145. PubMed ID: 28600254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. System development for multichannel electrotactile stimulation on the lips.
    Shim JW; Liu W; Tang H
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Sep; 28(7):734-9. PubMed ID: 16386447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Safety studies with the University of Melbourne multichannel electrotactile speech processor.
    Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Alcántara JI; Blombery PA; Hopkins IJ; Whitford LA; Clark GM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1992; 29(1):35-52. PubMed ID: 1740777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Continuous Transition Impairs Discrimination of Electrotactile Frequencies.
    Gholinezhad S; Dosen S; Dideriksen J
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2022; 15(4):753-758. PubMed ID: 36129873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Preliminary evaluation of the tactile feedback system based on artificial skin and electrotactile stimulation.
    Franceschi M; Seminara L; Pinna L; Dosen S; Farina D; Valle M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():4554-7. PubMed ID: 26737307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Vibrotactile sensory substitution for object manipulation: amplitude versus pulse train frequency modulation.
    Stepp CE; Matsuoka Y
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2012 Jan; 20(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 21997322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Electrotactile and Vibrotactile Feedback Enable Similar Performance in Psychometric Tests and Closed-Loop Control.
    Dideriksen J; Markovic M; Lemling S; Farina D; Dosen S
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2022; 15(1):222-231. PubMed ID: 34618676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Peripheral neurostimulation for encoding artificial somatosensations.
    Valle G
    Eur J Neurosci; 2022 Nov; 56(10):5888-5901. PubMed ID: 36097134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Lingual electrotactile stimulation as an alternative sensory feedback pathway for brain-computer interface applications.
    Wilson JA; Walton LM; Tyler M; Williams J
    J Neural Eng; 2012 Aug; 9(4):045007. PubMed ID: 22832032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Vibrotactile rendering of splashing fluids.
    Cirio G; Marchal M; Lécuyer A; Cooperstock JR
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2013; 6(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 24808273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The biology of skin wetness perception and its implications in manual function and for reproducing complex somatosensory signals in neuroprosthetics.
    Filingeri D; Ackerley R
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Apr; 117(4):1761-1775. PubMed ID: 28123008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Somatotopical feedback versus non-somatotopical feedback for phantom digit sensation on amputees using electrotactile stimulation.
    Zhang D; Xu H; Shull PB; Liu J; Zhu X
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 May; 12():44. PubMed ID: 25929589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Artificial tactile and proprioceptive feedback improves performance and confidence on object identification tasks.
    Schiefer MA; Graczyk EL; Sidik SM; Tan DW; Tyler DJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0207659. PubMed ID: 30517154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Electrotactile Feedback for the Discrimination of Different Surface Textures Using a Microphone.
    Svensson P; Antfolk C; Björkman A; Malešević N
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(10):. PubMed ID: 34066279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Closed-loop Control using Electrotactile Feedback Encoded in Frequency and Pulse Width.
    Dideriksen JL; Mercader IU; Dosen S
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2020; 13(4):818-824. PubMed ID: 32287006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Sensory feedback for upper limb prostheses.
    Hsiao SS; Fettiplace M; Darbandi B
    Prog Brain Res; 2011; 192():69-81. PubMed ID: 21763519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Vibro- and electrotactile user feedback on hand opening for myoelectric forearm prostheses.
    Witteveen HJ; Droog EA; Rietman JS; Veltink PH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Aug; 59(8):2219-26. PubMed ID: 22645262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary somatosensory cortex differentially modulates perception and sensorimotor transformations.
    Meehan SK; Legon W; Staines WR
    Neuroscience; 2008 Nov; 157(2):424-31. PubMed ID: 18838111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.