These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31677160)

  • 1. Technical Note: Robust individual thermoluminescence dosimeter tracking using optical fingerprinting.
    Shang D; Gu W; Landers A; Woods K; Yu V; Neph R; Tenn S; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):267-271. PubMed ID: 31677160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of TLD calibration methods for 192Ir dosimetry.
    Haworth A; Butler DJ; Wilfert L; Ebert MA; Todd SP; Hayton AJ; Kron T
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 14(1):4037. PubMed ID: 23318392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative thermoluminescence efficiency of TLD-600 and TLD-700 dosemeters irradiated with 59.8 MeV per nucleon krypton-86 ions.
    Mukherjee B; Ronningen RM; Cross P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 100(1-4):537-9. PubMed ID: 12382938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response of TLD-100 in mixed fields of photons and electrons.
    Lawless MJ; Junell S; Hammer C; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):012103. PubMed ID: 23298105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs to estimate the absorbed dose to water in liquid water around an 192Ir brachytherapy source.
    Lucas PA; Aubineau-Lanièce I; Lourenço V; Vermesse D; Cutarella D
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011711. PubMed ID: 24387503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of thermoluminescent dosimeter calibration irradiated in gamma knife and
    Moafi M; Geraily G; Shirazi AR
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2019 Mar; 15(Supplement):S123-S126. PubMed ID: 30900633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD-100) for absorbed dose measurements in alpha-emitting radionuclides.
    White AJ; Jollota SP; Hammer CG; Khan AU; DeWerd LA; Culberson WS
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2024 Jun; 208():111307. PubMed ID: 38564840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental monitoring through use of silica-based TLD.
    Rozaila ZS; Khandaker MU; Abdul Sani SF; Sabtu SN; Amin YM; Maah MJ; Bradley DA
    J Radiol Prot; 2017 Sep; 37(3):761-779. PubMed ID: 28581438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recent developments in phosphate materials for their thermoluminescence dosimeter (TLD) applications.
    Chand S; Mehra R; Chopra V
    Luminescence; 2021 Dec; 36(8):1808-1817. PubMed ID: 33047494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comparison of Readings from Thermoluminescent Dosimeter Ring Badges Worn in Different Positions.
    Osborne KL; Nielsen CJ; Bullock JR; Jennings SG
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2020 Dec; 48(4):361-362. PubMed ID: 32518118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SU-E-T-137: The Response of TLD-100 in Mixed Fields of Photons and Electrons.
    Lawless M; Junell S; Hammer C; DeWerd L
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part11):3734. PubMed ID: 28517172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Instrumentation and dosimeter-size artifacts in quantitative thermoluminescence dosimetry of low-dose fields.
    Meigooni AS; Mishra V; Panth H; Williamson J
    Med Phys; 1995 May; 22(5):555-61. PubMed ID: 7643791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility study of entrance in vivo dose measurements with mailed thermoluminescence detectors.
    Swinnen A; Verstraete J; Huyskens DP
    Radiother Oncol; 2004 Oct; 73(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 15465151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thermoluminescent dosimeters for low dose X-ray measurements.
    Del Sol Fernández S; García-Salcedo R; Sánchez-Guzmán D; Ramírez-Rodríguez G; Gaona E; de León-Alfaro MA; Rivera-Montalvo T
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Jan; 107():340-345. PubMed ID: 26609683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the evaluation of the relative sensitivity of commercial TLD readers using well characterized TLD chips.
    Roland T; Esquivel C; Stathakis S; Papanikolaou N
    J BUON; 2008; 13(4):547-51. PubMed ID: 19145678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variability of two methods of measuring absorbed dose in dental radiography.
    Soh G; Chong YH
    Clin Prev Dent; 1992; 14(6):17-9. PubMed ID: 1298572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Entrance and exit dose measurements with semiconductors and thermoluminescent dosemeters: a comparison of methods and in vivo results.
    Loncol T; Greffe JL; Vynckier S; Scalliet P
    Radiother Oncol; 1996 Nov; 41(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 9004362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimum parameters of TLD100 powder used for radiotherapy beams calibration check.
    Arib M; Yaich A; Messadi A; Dari F
    Med Dosim; 2006; 31(3):184-9. PubMed ID: 16905448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Whole-body dose and energy measurements in radiotherapy by a combination of LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti.
    Hauri P; Schneider U
    Z Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 28(2):96-109. PubMed ID: 28807441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Type testing of a locally made LiF:Mg,Ti + PTFE TLD for its use as a personal dosimeter.
    Azorín J; Torijano E; Azorín C
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2018 Nov; 141():246-249. PubMed ID: 29843989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.