165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31677427)
1. The Cost-Effectiveness of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening in Estonia.
Reile R; Võrno T; Kals J; Ilves P; Kiivet RA
Value Health Reg Issues; 2020 Sep; 22():1-6. PubMed ID: 31677427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An economic evaluation of an abdominal aortic aneurysm screening program in Italy.
Giardina S; Pane B; Spinella G; Cafueri G; Corbo M; Brasseur P; Orengo G; Palombo D
J Vasc Surg; 2011 Oct; 54(4):938-46. PubMed ID: 21820837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening women aged 65 years or over for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a modelling study and health economic evaluation.
Thompson SG; Bown MJ; Glover MJ; Jones E; Masconi KL; Michaels JA; Powell JT; Ulug P; Sweeting MJ
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Aug; 22(43):1-142. PubMed ID: 30132754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of a population-based AAA screening program for men over 65 years old in Iran.
Daroudi R; Shafe O; Moosavi J; Salimi J; Bayazidi Y; Zafarghandi MR; Maleki M; Moini M; Farshidmehr P; Sadeghipour P
Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2021 May; 19(1):29. PubMed ID: 33985531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Combination with Medical Intervention in Patients with Small Aneurysms.
Zarrouk M; Lundqvist A; Holst J; Troëng T; Gottsäter A
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2016 Jun; 51(6):766-73. PubMed ID: 26952345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Health gains, costs and cost-effectiveness of a population-based screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Nair N; Kvizhinadze G; Jones GT; Rush R; Khashram M; Roake J; Blakely A
Br J Surg; 2019 Jul; 106(8):1043-1054. PubMed ID: 31115915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of cost effectiveness of screening Danish men aged 65 for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Ehlers L; Overvad K; Sørensen J; Christensen S; Bech M; Kjølby M
BMJ; 2009 Jun; 338():b2243. PubMed ID: 19553267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of targeted screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in siblings.
Hultgren R; Linné A; Svensjö S
Br J Surg; 2019 Feb; 106(3):206-216. PubMed ID: 30702746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of clinical benefit, harms, and cost-effectiveness of screening women for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Sweeting MJ; Masconi KL; Jones E; Ulug P; Glover MJ; Michaels JA; Bown MJ; Powell JT; Thompson SG
Lancet; 2018 Aug; 392(10146):487-495. PubMed ID: 30057105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefit, risks and cost-effectiveness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Schmidt T; Mühlberger N; Chemelli-Steingruber IE; Strasak A; Kofler B; Chemelli A; Siebert U
Rofo; 2010 Jul; 182(7):573-80. PubMed ID: 20563953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in men: a Canadian perspective using Monte Carlo-based estimates.
Montreuil B; Brophy J
Can J Surg; 2008 Feb; 51(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 18248702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Changes to the Surveillance Intervals in the UK Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Programme.
Sweeting MJ; Marshall J; Glover M; Nasim A; Bown MJ
Value Health; 2021 Mar; 24(3):369-376. PubMed ID: 33641771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Netherlands and Norway.
Spronk S; van Kempen BJ; Boll AP; Jørgensen JJ; Hunink MG; Kristiansen IS
Br J Surg; 2011 Nov; 98(11):1546-55. PubMed ID: 21725968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mass screening on abdominal aortic aneurysm in men aged 60 to 65 years in The Netherlands. Impact on life expectancy and cost-effectiveness using a Markov model.
Boll AP; Severens JL; Verbeek AL; van der Vliet JA
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2003 Jul; 26(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 12819652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Wanhainen A; Lundkvist J; Bergqvist D; Björck M
J Vasc Surg; 2005 May; 41(5):741-51; discussion 751. PubMed ID: 15886653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening individuals with intracranial aneurysms for abdominal aortic aneurysms is cost-effective based on estimated coprevalence.
Ball BZ; Jiang B; Mehndiratta P; Stukenborg GJ; Upchurch GR; Meschia JF; Worrall BB; Southerland AM
J Vasc Surg; 2016 Sep; 64(3):811-818.e3. PubMed ID: 27565600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. One-time screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Ontario, Canada: a model-based cost-utility analysis.
Vervoort D; Hirode G; Lindsay TF; Tam DY; Kapila V; de Mestral C
CMAJ; 2024 Feb; 196(4):E112-E120. PubMed ID: 38316457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in 65-year-old men remains cost-effective with contemporary epidemiology and management.
Svensjö S; Mani K; Björck M; Lundkvist J; Wanhainen A
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 Apr; 47(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 24485841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of population-based vascular disease screening and intervention in men from the Viborg Vascular (VIVA) trial.
Søgaard R; Lindholt JS
Br J Surg; 2018 Sep; 105(10):1283-1293. PubMed ID: 29691840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revisiting the cost-effectiveness of screening 65-year-old men for abdominal aortic aneurysm based on data from an implemented screening programme.
Hager J; Henriksson M; Carlsson P; Länne T; Lundgren F
Int Angiol; 2017 Dec; 36(6):517-525. PubMed ID: 27905693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
