These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31677444)

  • 1. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions. Part II: Evaluation of biological traces considering activity level propositions.
    Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102186. PubMed ID: 31677444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions: Part I: evaluation of DNA profiling comparisons given (sub-) source propositions.
    Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():189-202. PubMed ID: 30041098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of forensic genetics findings given activity level propositions: A review.
    Taylor D; Kokshoorn B; Biedermann A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():34-49. PubMed ID: 29929059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structuring cases into propositions, assumptions, and undisputed case information.
    Taylor D; Kokshoorn B; Hicks T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102199. PubMed ID: 31756630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A template for constructing Bayesian networks in forensic biology cases when considering activity level propositions.
    Taylor D; Biedermann A; Hicks T; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():136-146. PubMed ID: 29275089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating forensic biology results given source level propositions.
    Taylor D; Abarno D; Hicks T; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():54-67. PubMed ID: 26720813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of Bayesian Networks and simulation methods to identify the variables impacting the value of evidence assessed under activity level propositions in stabbing cases.
    Samie L; Champod C; Taylor D; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102334. PubMed ID: 32563838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing multiple POI to DNA mixtures.
    Hicks T; Kerr Z; Pugh S; Bright JA; Curran J; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102481. PubMed ID: 33607394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Logical Framework for Forensic DNA Interpretation.
    Hicks T; Buckleton J; Castella V; Evett I; Jackson G
    Genes (Basel); 2022 May; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 35741719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The importance of considering common sources of unknown DNA when evaluating findings given activity level propositions.
    Taylor D; Volgin L; Kokshoorn B; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102518. PubMed ID: 33865097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using Bayesian networks to track DNA movement through complex transfer scenarios.
    Taylor D; Samie L; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():69-80. PubMed ID: 31234042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Forensic DNA Traces When Propositions of Interest Relate to Activities: Analysis and Discussion of Recurrent Concerns.
    Biedermann A; Champod C; Jackson G; Gill P; Taylor D; Butler J; Morling N; Hicks T; Vuille J; Taroni F
    Front Genet; 2016; 7():215. PubMed ID: 28018424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Helping formulate propositions in forensic DNA analysis.
    Buckleton J; Bright JA; Taylor D; Evett I; Hicks T; Jackson G; Curran JM
    Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):258-61. PubMed ID: 25002042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Activity level DNA evidence evaluation: On propositions addressing the actor or the activity.
    Kokshoorn B; Blankers BJ; de Zoete J; Berger CEH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():115-124. PubMed ID: 28715673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An LR framework incorporating sensitivity analysis to model multiple direct and secondary transfer events on skin surface.
    Gill P; Bleka Ø; Roseth A; Fonneløp AE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102509. PubMed ID: 33930816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accounting for site-to-site DNA transfer on a packaged exhibit in an evaluation given activity level propositions.
    Taylor D; Volgin L; Kokshoorn B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Nov; 73():103122. PubMed ID: 39159582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.
    Hicks T; Biedermann A; de Koeijer JA; Taroni F; Champod C; Evett IW
    Sci Justice; 2015 Dec; 55(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 26654089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recommendations of the Polish Speaking Working Group of the International Society for Forensic Genetics on forensic Y chromosome typing.
    Rębała K; Branicki W; Pawłowski R; Spólnicka M; Kupiec T; Parys-Proszek A; Woźniak M; Grzybowski T; Boroń M; Wróbel M; Ciesielka M; Ossowski A; Jacewicz R
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2020; 70(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 32876419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the evaluation of STR typing results that may include drop-out and/or drop-in using probabilistic methods.
    Gill P; Gusmão L; Haned H; Mayr WR; Morling N; Parson W; Prieto L; Prinz M; Schneider H; Schneider PM; Weir BS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):679-88. PubMed ID: 22864188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Practical Guide for the Formulation of Propositions in the Bayesian Approach to DNA Evidence Interpretation in an Adversarial Environment.
    Gittelson S; Kalafut T; Myers S; Taylor D; Hicks T; Taroni F; Evett IW; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Jan; 61(1):186-95. PubMed ID: 26248867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.