These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31677667)
1. X-ray beam angulation can compromise 2-dimensional diagnosis of interradicular space for mini-implants. Barros SE; Abella M; Janson G; Chiqueto K Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Nov; 156(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 31677667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of interdental space of the maxillary posterior area for orthodontic mini-implants with cone-beam computed tomography. Kim SH; Yoon HG; Choi YS; Hwang EH; Kook YA; Nelson G Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 19409346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study. Kalra S; Tripathi T; Rai P; Kanase A Prog Orthod; 2014 Nov; 15(1):61. PubMed ID: 25406652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative evaluation of maxillary interradicular bone with cone-beam computed tomography for bicortical placement of orthodontic mini-implants. Yang L; Li F; Cao M; Chen H; Wang X; Chen X; Yang L; Gao W; Petrone JF; Ding Y Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):725-37. PubMed ID: 26038077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults. Park J; Cho HJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Safe zones of the maxillary posterior area for mini-implant insertion in adolescents with skeletal Class II malocclusion]. Liao Q; Wang YJ; Zhang WY; Zhou D; Fan XP Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2018 Aug; 27(4):370-375. PubMed ID: 30483703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary interradicular sites for mini-implant placement. Sawada K; Nakahara K; Matsunaga S; Abe S; Ide Y Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():1-7. PubMed ID: 22092972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cone-beam computed tomography and digital model analysis of maxillary buccal alveolar bone thickness for vertical temporary skeletal anchorage device placement. Giap HV; Lee JY; Nguyen H; Chae HS; Kim YH; Shin JW Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 May; 161(5):e429-e438. PubMed ID: 35346539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tomographic mapping of mandibular interradicular spaces for placement of orthodontic mini-implants. Monnerat C; Restle L; Mucha JN Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):428.e1-9; discussion 428-9. PubMed ID: 19361724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of interradicular space, soft tissue, and hard tissue of the posterior palatal alveolar process for orthodontic mini-implant, using cone-beam computed tomography. Lee JA; Ahn HW; Oh SH; Park KH; Kim SH; Nelson G Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Apr; 159(4):460-469. PubMed ID: 33526299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiographic evaluation on the assessment of periapical bone destruction in dog's teeth. Ordinola-Zapata R; Bramante CM; Duarte MH; Ramos Fernandes LM; Camargo EJ; de Moraes IG; Bernardineli N; Vivan RR; Capelozza AL; Garcia RB Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Aug; 112(2):272-9. PubMed ID: 21530334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation between tooth size-arch length discrepancy and interradicular distances measured on CBCT and panoramic radiograph: an evaluation for miniscrew insertion. Tepedino M; Cornelis MA; Chimenti C; Cattaneo PM Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(5):39.e1-39.e13. PubMed ID: 30427499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oblique Plane Cutting of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analysis on the Safe Zone for Micro-Implants of Maxillary Molar Region. Wang C; Wang G; Xin C; You Q; Wu J J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(2):397-399. PubMed ID: 31842070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Facial Fenestration and Dehiscence Defects Associated With Immediate Implant Placement Without Flap Elevation in Anterior Maxillary Ridge: A Preliminary Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. Lin CY; Pan WL; Wang HL Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1112-1118. PubMed ID: 30231099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary interradicular sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement. Lim JE; Lim WH; Chun YS Clin Anat; 2008 Sep; 21(6):486-91. PubMed ID: 18698651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement. Lim JE; Lee SJ; Kim YJ; Lim WH; Chun YS Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Nov; 12(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 19840282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Agreement between periapical radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of periapical status of root filled molar teeth. Cheung GS; Wei WL; McGrath C Int Endod J; 2013 Oct; 46(10):889-95. PubMed ID: 23442122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Sherrard JF; Rossouw PE; Benson BW; Carrillo R; Buschang PH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4 Suppl):S100-8. PubMed ID: 20381750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evaluation of the periapical status of teeth with necrotic pulps using periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography. Abella F; Patel S; Durán-Sindreu F; Mercadé M; Bueno R; Roig M Int Endod J; 2014 Apr; 47(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 23889592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]