These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31677724)

  • 21. The nomenclature and sectional imaging anatomy II: ventral spinal ligaments.
    Hayman LA; Kuhns LR; Benedetti PF; Fahr LM; Taber KH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(4):659-61. PubMed ID: 10966207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Automated detection of spinal centrelines, vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs in CT and MR images of lumbar spine.
    Stern D; Likar B; Pernus F; Vrtovec T
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 55(1):247-64. PubMed ID: 20009200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Detection of cerebrospinal fluid metastasis: CT myelography or MR?
    Heinz R; Wiener D; Friedman H; Tien R
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1995 May; 16(5):1147-51. PubMed ID: 7639142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Imaging of the lumbar spine].
    Cotten A; Ludig T; Blum A
    J Radiol; 2002 Sep; 83(9 Pt 2):1149-59; discussion 1161-3. PubMed ID: 12223973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sensitivity of MRI of the spine compared with CT myelography in orthostatic headache with CSF leak.
    Starling A; Hernandez F; Hoxworth JM; Trentman T; Halker R; Vargas BB; Hastriter E; Dodick D
    Neurology; 2013 Nov; 81(20):1789-92. PubMed ID: 24107860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Floating dural sac sign is a sensitive magnetic resonance imaging finding of spinal cerebrospinal fluid leakage.
    Hosoya T; Hatazawa J; Sato S; Kanoto M; Fukao A; Kayama T
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2013; 53(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 23615408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ultrafast dynamic computed tomography myelography for the precise identification of high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leaks caused by spiculated spinal osteophytes.
    Thielen KR; Sillery JC; Morris JM; Hoxworth JM; Diehn FE; Wald JT; Rosebrock RE; Yu L; Luetmer PH
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 25555057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Noninvasive magnetic resonance myelography in patients with lumbosacral intervertebral disk herniation].
    Arutiunov NV; Konovalov NA; Mel'nikova-Pitskheluri TV; Fadeeva LM; Tissen TP
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2011; (2):41-6. PubMed ID: 21866824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of MR and CT myelography in imaging the cervical and thoracic spine.
    Karnaze MG; Gado MH; Sartor KJ; Hodges FJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Feb; 150(2):397-403. PubMed ID: 3257332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Imaging appearance of primary bony tumors and pseudo-tumors of the spine.
    Abdel Razek AA; Castillo M
    J Neuroradiol; 2010 Mar; 37(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 19781780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. CT Myelography: Clinical Indications and Imaging Findings.
    Patel DM; Weinberg BD; Hoch MJ
    Radiographics; 2020; 40(2):470-484. PubMed ID: 32058837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Imaging of lumbar stenosis].
    Morvan G
    J Radiol; 2002 Sep; 83(9 Pt 2):1165-75; discussion 1177-9. PubMed ID: 12223974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Feasibility and potential value of flat-panel detector-based computed tomography in myelography after spinal surgery.
    Kau T; Rabitsch E; Celedin S; Jeschofnig B; Illiasch H; Eicher W; Uhl E; Honl M; Hausegger KA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Jan; 10(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19119936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Multislice computed tomographic myelography].
    Klingebiel R; Masuhr F; Rogalla P; Hein E; Juran R; Bauknecht HC; Bohner G
    Nervenarzt; 2006 Feb; 77(2):231-8, 241; quiz 242-3. PubMed ID: 16283150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine: MR/MR myelography versus conventional myelography/post-myelography CT.
    Shiban E; von Lehe M; Simon M; Clusmann H; Heinrich P; Ringel F; Wilhelm K; Urbach H; Meyer B; Stoffel M
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 Aug; 158(8):1571-8. PubMed ID: 27255654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Magnetic resonance imaging compared with computed tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of spinal masses.
    Fenzl G; Heywang SH; Lissner J; Steinhoff H; Vogl T; Fink U; Obermüller J; Einhüpl K
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1986; 369():257-9. PubMed ID: 2980468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Imaging of the Spontaneous Low Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure Headache: A Review.
    Martineau P; Chakraborty S; Faiz K; Shankar J
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2020 May; 71(2):174-185. PubMed ID: 32063004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Radiological assessment of degenerative lumbar stenosis].
    Grauer W
    Orthopade; 1993 Aug; 22(4):214-22. PubMed ID: 8414477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparisons between heavily T2-weighted MR and CT myelography studies in two patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension.
    Tsai PH; Fuh JL; Lirng JF; Wang SJ
    Cephalalgia; 2008 Jun; 28(6):653-7. PubMed ID: 18422723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dynamic effects on the lumbar spinal canal: axially loaded CT-myelography and MRI in patients with sciatica and/or neurogenic claudication.
    Willén J; Danielson B; Gaulitz A; Niklason T; Schönström N; Hansson T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Dec; 22(24):2968-76. PubMed ID: 9431634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.