These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Double Ring in Cochlear Otosclerosis: A Limit to Cochlear Implantation? The Solution Is the Surgical Approach. Messineo D; Ralli M; Greco A; Di Stadio A Ear Nose Throat J; 2021 Jun; 100(3_suppl):235S-237S. PubMed ID: 31842623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CHARGE syndrome and Cochlear implantation: difficulties and outcomes in the paediatric population. Birman CS; Brew JA; Gibson WP; Elliott EJ Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Apr; 79(4):487-92. PubMed ID: 25649713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children. Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Basis of electrical stimulation of the cochlea and the cochlear nucleus. Shepherd RK; McCreery DB Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2006; 64():186-205. PubMed ID: 16891843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychophysical Map Stability in Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implantation: Comparing Current Audiology Methods to a New Statistical Definition. Domville-Lewis C; Santa Maria PL; Upson G; Chester-Browne R; Atlas MD Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 25710778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy. Rowe D; Chambers S; Hampson A; Eastwood H; Campbell L; O'Leary S Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():49-57. PubMed ID: 26739790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception. Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intracochlear Electrocochleography: Response Patterns During Cochlear Implantation and Hearing Preservation. Giardina CK; Brown KD; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Hutson KA; Pillsbury HC; Fitzpatrick DC Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):833-848. PubMed ID: 30335669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neural distribution of hearing structures in inner ear malformations and the need of further cochlear implant stimulation strategies. Sainz M; Fernández E; García-Valdecasas J; Aviñoa A Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():204-6. PubMed ID: 21756613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abnormal Cochleovestibular Anatomy and Hearing Outcomes: Pediatric Patients with a Questionable Cochleovestibular Nerve Status May Benefit from Cochlear Implantation and/or Hearing Aids. Kari E; Go JL; Loggins J; Emmanuel N; Fisher LM Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 29936507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Novel use of the Cochlear Atiya Y; Ahmed MR; Schlesinger-Michelow D Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):167-169. PubMed ID: 29457563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pediatric cochlear implantation: candidacy evaluation, medical and surgical considerations, and expanding criteria. Heman-Ackah SE; Roland JT; Haynes DS; Waltzman SB Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2012 Feb; 45(1):41-67. PubMed ID: 22115681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use. Telmesani LM; Said NM Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristics of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in patients with cochlear nerve canal stenosis receiving cochlear implants. Wang Z; Liu Y; Wang L; Shen X; Han S; Wang W; Gao F; Liang W; Peng KA Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jan; 104():98-103. PubMed ID: 29287891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is electrode-modiolus distance a prognostic factor for hearing performances after cochlear implant surgery? Esquia Medina GN; Borel S; Nguyen Y; Ambert-Dahan E; Ferrary E; Sterkers O; Grayeli AB Audiol Neurootol; 2013; 18(6):406-13. PubMed ID: 24157488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-penetrating round window electrode stimulation for tinnitus therapy followed by cochlear implantation. Wenzel GI; Sarnes P; Warnecke A; Stöver T; Jäger B; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 272(11):3283-93. PubMed ID: 25480476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Insertion trauma and recovery of function after cochlear implantation: Evidence from objective functional measures. Pfingst BE; Hughes AP; Colesa DJ; Watts MM; Strahl SB; Raphael Y Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):98-105. PubMed ID: 26209185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]