These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31681072)

  • 1. Meta-Analysis of the Validity of General Mental Ability for Five Performance Criteria: Hunter and Hunter (1984) Revisited.
    Salgado JF; Moscoso S
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2227. PubMed ID: 31681072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A meta-analytic study of general mental ability validity for different occupations in the European community.
    Salgado JF; Anderson N; Moscoso S; Bertua C; de Fruyt F; Rolland JP
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Dec; 88(6):1068-81. PubMed ID: 14640817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Criterion Validity of Cognitive Reflection for Predicting Job Performance and Training Proficiency: A Meta-Analysis.
    Otero I; Salgado JF; Moscoso S
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():668592. PubMed ID: 34135827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incremental Validity of Character Strengths as Predictors of Job Performance Beyond General Mental Ability and the Big Five.
    Harzer C; Bezuglova N; Weber M
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():518369. PubMed ID: 33776825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A meta-analysis of the relationship between general mental ability and nontask performance.
    Gonzalez-Mulé E; Mount MK; Oh IS
    J Appl Psychol; 2014 Nov; 99(6):1222-43. PubMed ID: 25133304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using individual differences to predict job performance: correcting for direct and indirect restriction of range.
    Sjöberg S; Sjöberg A; Näswall K; Sverke M
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 53(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 22612634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Theory of Sex Differences in Technical Aptitude and Some Supporting Evidence.
    Schmidt FL
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2011 Nov; 6(6):560-73. PubMed ID: 26168377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Insights from an updated personnel selection meta-analytic matrix: Revisiting general mental ability tests' role in the validity-diversity trade-off.
    Berry CM; Lievens F; Zhang C; Sackett PR
    J Appl Psychol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38695805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Specific Abilities in the Workplace: More Important Than
    Kell HJ; Lang JWB
    J Intell; 2017 Apr; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 31162404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. General mental ability in the world of work: occupational attainment and job performance.
    Schmidt FL; Hunter J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Jan; 86(1):162-73. PubMed ID: 14717634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A contemporary look at the relationship between general cognitive ability and job performance.
    Sackett PR; Demeke S; Bazian IM; Griebie AM; Priest R; Kuncel NR
    J Appl Psychol; 2024 May; 109(5):687-713. PubMed ID: 38059952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. General mental ability and specific abilities: Their relative importance for extrinsic career success.
    Lang JWB; Kell HJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2020 Sep; 105(9):1047-1061. PubMed ID: 31855028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A test of a proposed method for estimating validity of a multivariate composite predictor: extending the job component validity model.
    Hoffman CC; Morris D; Luck G
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):900-16. PubMed ID: 20099553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating cognitive ability, knowledge tests and situational judgement tests for postgraduate selection.
    Koczwara A; Patterson F; Zibarras L; Kerrin M; Irish B; Wilkinson M
    Med Educ; 2012 Apr; 46(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 22429176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment centers versus cognitive ability tests: Challenging the conventional wisdom on criterion-related validity.
    Sackett PR; Shewach OR; Keiser HN
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 Oct; 102(10):1435-1447. PubMed ID: 28530416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-Analysis of Interrater Reliability of Supervisory Performance Ratings: Effects of Appraisal Purpose, Scale Type, and Range Restriction.
    Salgado JF; Moscoso S
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2281. PubMed ID: 31681087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: an updated meta-analysis.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Raymark PH; Odle-Dusseau HN
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):499-530. PubMed ID: 21319880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring the Relationship between Cognitive Ability Tilt and Job Performance.
    Kato AE; Scherbaum CA
    J Intell; 2023 Feb; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 36976137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The validity of general cognitive ability predicting job-specific performance is stable across different levels of job experience.
    Hambrick DZ; Burgoyne AP; Oswald FL
    J Appl Psychol; 2024 Mar; 109(3):437-455. PubMed ID: 37843546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical versus clinical data combination in selection and admissions decisions: a meta-analysis.
    Kuncel NR; Klieger DM; Connelly BS; Ones DS
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Nov; 98(6):1060-72. PubMed ID: 24041118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.