These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31681400)

  • 1. Psychometric Modelling of Longitudinal Genetically Informative Twin Data.
    Schwabe I; Gu Z; Tijmstra J; Hatemi P; Pohl S
    Front Genet; 2019; 10():837. PubMed ID: 31681400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variance decomposition using an IRT measurement model.
    van den Berg SM; Glas CA; Boomsma DI
    Behav Genet; 2007 Jul; 37(4):604-16. PubMed ID: 17534709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sum Scores in Twin Growth Curve Models: Practicality Versus Bias.
    Luningham JM; McArtor DB; Bartels M; Boomsma DI; Lubke GH
    Behav Genet; 2017 Sep; 47(5):516-536. PubMed ID: 28780665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bias in Gene-by-Environment Interaction Effects with Sum Scores; An Application to Well-being Phenotypes.
    Pelt DHM; Schwabe I; Bartels M
    Behav Genet; 2023 Jul; 53(4):359-373. PubMed ID: 36856918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement model choice influenced randomized controlled trial results.
    Gorter R; Fox JP; Apeldoorn A; Twisk J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Nov; 79():140-149. PubMed ID: 27394673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sources of Error in IRT Trait Estimation.
    Feuerstahler LM
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Jul; 42(5):359-375. PubMed ID: 30034054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Avoiding bias from sum scores in growth estimates: An examination of IRT-based approaches to scoring longitudinal survey responses.
    Kuhfeld M; Soland J
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Apr; 27(2):234-260. PubMed ID: 33090818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mathematical Ability and Socio-Economic Background: IRT Modeling to Estimate Genotype by Environment Interaction.
    Schwabe I; Boomsma DI; van den Berg SM
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2017 Dec; 20(6):511-520. PubMed ID: 29103406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of analysis of variance and maximum likelihood based path analysis of twin data: partitioning genetic and environmental sources of covariance.
    Christian JC; Norton JA; Sorbel J; Williams CJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 7713398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A New Approach to Handle Missing Covariate Data in Twin Research : With an Application to Educational Achievement Data.
    Schwabe I; Boomsma DI; Zeeuw EL; Berg SM
    Behav Genet; 2016 Jul; 46(4):583-95. PubMed ID: 26687147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefits of the Curious Behavior of Bayesian Hierarchical Item Response Theory Models-An in-Depth Investigation and Bias Correction.
    König C; Alexandrowicz RW
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2024 Mar; 48(1-2):38-56. PubMed ID: 38327609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using item response theory to calibrate the Headache Impact Test (HIT) to the metric of traditional headache scales.
    Bjorner JB; Kosinski M; Ware JE
    Qual Life Res; 2003 Dec; 12(8):981-1002. PubMed ID: 14651417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Longitudinal Twin Study of Insomnia Symptoms in Adults.
    Lind MJ; Aggen SH; Kirkpatrick RM; Kendler KS; Amstadter AB
    Sleep; 2015 Sep; 38(9):1423-30. PubMed ID: 26132482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement bias and error correction in a two-stage estimation for multilevel IRT models.
    Zhang X; Wang C
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():247-274. PubMed ID: 33550594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Impact of Variation in Twin Relatedness on Estimates of Heritability and Environmental Influences.
    Liu C; Molenaar PCM; Neiderhiser JM
    Behav Genet; 2018 Jan; 48(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 29098497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Problems with using sum scores for estimating variance components: contamination and measurement noninvariance.
    Neale MC; Lubke G; Aggen SH; Dolan CV
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2005 Dec; 8(6):553-68. PubMed ID: 16354497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Precision and bias of a normal finite mixture distribution model to analyze twin data when zygosity is unknown: simulations and application to IQ phenotypes on a large sample of twin pairs.
    Benyamin B; Deary IJ; Visscher PM
    Behav Genet; 2006 Nov; 36(6):935-46. PubMed ID: 16786426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dependence of Gene-by-Environment Interactions (GxE) on Scaling: Comparing the Use of Sum Scores, Transformed Sum Scores and IRT Scores for the Phenotype in Tests of GxE.
    Murray AL; Molenaar D; Johnson W; Krueger RF
    Behav Genet; 2016 Jul; 46(4):552-72. PubMed ID: 26833465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation and psychometric properties of the Somatic and Psychological HEalth REport (SPHERE) in a young Australian-based population sample using non-parametric item response theory.
    Couvy-Duchesne B; Davenport TA; Martin NG; Wright MJ; Hickie IB
    BMC Psychiatry; 2017 Aug; 17(1):279. PubMed ID: 28764680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. www.common-metrics.org: a web application to estimate scores from different patient-reported outcome measures on a common scale.
    Fischer HF; Rose M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):142. PubMed ID: 27760525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.