BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31682350)

  • 1. An Objective Approach to Decisions to Withdraw or Withhold Life-sustaining Medical Treatment.
    Savulescu J; Cameron J
    J Law Med; 2019 Oct; 27(1):192-210. PubMed ID: 31682350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When Is It in a Child's Best Interests to Withhold or Withdraw Life-sustaining Treatment? An Evolving Australian Jurisprudence.
    Willmott L; White B; Bhatia N
    J Law Med; 2018 Jul; 25(4):944-972. PubMed ID: 29978678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Doctor's Discretion Not To Offer Life-sustaining Treatment.
    Cameron J
    J Law Med; 2019 Oct; 27(1):164-177. PubMed ID: 31682348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Best interests" and withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from an adult who lacks capacity in the parens patriae jurisdiction.
    Willmott L; White B; Smith MK
    J Law Med; 2014 Jun; 21(4):920-41. PubMed ID: 25087370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hospital Policy Variation in Addressing Decisions to Withhold and Withdraw Life-Sustaining Treatment.
    Piscitello GM; Lyons PG; Koch VG; Parker WF; Huber MT
    Chest; 2024 Apr; 165(4):950-958. PubMed ID: 38184166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing doctors' legal compliance across three Australian states for decisions whether to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment: does different law lead to different decisions?
    White BP; Willmott L; Cartwright C; Parker M; Williams G; Davis J
    BMC Palliat Care; 2017 Nov; 16(1):63. PubMed ID: 29179708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The legal role of medical professionals in decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment: part 2 (Queensland).
    Willmott L; White B; Parker M; Cartwright C
    J Law Med; 2011 Mar; 18(3):523-44. PubMed ID: 21528738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The legal basis for ethical withholding and withdrawing of life-sustaining medical treatment in children.
    Tibballs J
    J Law Med; 2006 Nov; 14(2):244-61. PubMed ID: 17153529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments: an 8-yr retrospective review in a Spanish pediatric intensive care unit.
    Launes C; Cambra FJ; Jordán I; Palomeque A
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2011 Nov; 12(6):e383-5. PubMed ID: 21263365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The legal role of medical professionals in decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment: part 1 (New South Wales).
    White B; Willmott L; Trowse P; Parker M; Cartwright C
    J Law Med; 2011 Mar; 18(3):498-522. PubMed ID: 21528737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physicians' decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment.
    Farber NJ; Simpson P; Salam T; Collier VU; Weiner J; Boyer EG
    Arch Intern Med; 2006 Mar; 166(5):560-4. PubMed ID: 16534044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decisions about life-sustaining measures in children: in whose best interests?
    Cornfield DN; Kahn JP
    Acta Paediatr; 2012 Apr; 101(4):333-6. PubMed ID: 22103464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physician decision-making process about withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in paediatric patients: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.
    Zhong Y; Cavolo A; Labarque V; Gastmans C
    BMC Palliat Care; 2022 Jun; 21(1):113. PubMed ID: 35751075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in a patient's best interests: Australian judicial deliberations.
    Willmott L; White B; Smith MK; Wilkinson DJ
    Med J Aust; 2014 Nov; 201(9):545-7. PubMed ID: 25358584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decision-making at the end-of-life and the incompetent patient: a comparative approach.
    Halliday S; Witteck L
    Med Law; 2003; 22(3):533-42. PubMed ID: 14626885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Charlie Gard: in defence of the law.
    Close E; Willmott L; White BP
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Jul; 44(7):476-480. PubMed ID: 29724811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using mediation in situations of withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: a New South Wales perspective.
    Bowen T
    J Law Med; 2009 Aug; 17(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 19771988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Legal aspects of withdrawal of therapy.
    Young RJ; King A
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2003 Oct; 31(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 14601271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Raqeeb, Haastrup, and Evans: Seeking Consistency through a Distributive Justice-Based Approach to Limitation of Treatment in the Context of Dispute.
    Cameron J; Savulescu J; Wilkinson D
    J Law Med Ethics; 2022; 50(1):169-180. PubMed ID: 35243998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.