BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31682602)

  • 1. Direct prediction of regulatory elements from partial data without imputation.
    Zhang Y; Mahony S
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Nov; 15(11):e1007399. PubMed ID: 31682602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of imputation methods on the amount of genetic variation captured by a single-nucleotide polymorphism panel in soybeans.
    Xavier A; Muir WM; Rainey KM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 17():55. PubMed ID: 26830693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decoding regulatory structures and features from epigenomics profiles: A Roadmap-ENCODE Variational Auto-Encoder (RE-VAE) model.
    Hu R; Pei G; Jia P; Zhao Z
    Methods; 2021 May; 189():44-53. PubMed ID: 31672653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Whole-genome characterization in pedigreed non-human primates using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) and imputation.
    Bimber BN; Raboin MJ; Letaw J; Nevonen KA; Spindel JE; McCouch SR; Cervera-Juanes R; Spindel E; Carbone L; Ferguson B; Vinson A
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):676. PubMed ID: 27558348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating Imputation Algorithms for Low-Depth Genotyping-By-Sequencing (GBS) Data.
    Chan AW; Hamblin MT; Jannink JL
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160733. PubMed ID: 27537694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discovery of regulatory elements in vertebrates through comparative genomics.
    Prakash A; Tompa M
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Oct; 23(10):1249-56. PubMed ID: 16211068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molgenis-impute: imputation pipeline in a box.
    Kanterakis A; Deelen P; van Dijk F; Byelas H; Dijkstra M; Swertz MA
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Aug; 8():359. PubMed ID: 26286716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A MAD-Bayes Algorithm for State-Space Inference and Clustering with Application to Querying Large Collections of ChIP-Seq Data Sets.
    Zuo C; Chen K; Keleş S
    J Comput Biol; 2017 Jun; 24(6):472-485. PubMed ID: 27835030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PREDICTD PaRallel Epigenomics Data Imputation with Cloud-based Tensor Decomposition.
    Durham TJ; Libbrecht MW; Howbert JJ; Bilmes J; Noble WS
    Nat Commun; 2018 Apr; 9(1):1402. PubMed ID: 29643364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accurate and reproducible functional maps in 127 human cell types via 2D genome segmentation.
    Zhang Y; Hardison RC
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Sep; 45(17):9823-9836. PubMed ID: 28973456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SCOPE: A Normalization and Copy-Number Estimation Method for Single-Cell DNA Sequencing.
    Wang R; Lin DY; Jiang Y
    Cell Syst; 2020 May; 10(5):445-452.e6. PubMed ID: 32437686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation of untyped markers and impacts on statistical power for association studies.
    Hao K; Chudin E; McElwee J; Schadt EE
    BMC Genet; 2009 Jun; 10():27. PubMed ID: 19531258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. De novo prediction of cis-regulatory elements and modules through integrative analysis of a large number of ChIP datasets.
    Niu M; Tabari ES; Su Z
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15():1047. PubMed ID: 25442502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
    van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of imputation to whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
    van Binsbergen R; Bink MC; Calus MP; van Eeuwijk FA; Hayes BJ; Hulsegge I; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jul; 46(1):41. PubMed ID: 25022768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Universal annotation of the human genome through integration of over a thousand epigenomic datasets.
    Vu H; Ernst J
    Genome Biol; 2022 Jan; 23(1):9. PubMed ID: 34991667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Restriction site-associated DNA sequencing technologies as an alternative to low-density SNP chips for genomic selection: a simulation study in layer chickens.
    Herry F; Hérault F; Lecerf F; Lagoutte L; Doublet M; Picard-Druet D; Bardou P; Varenne A; Burlot T; Le Roy P; Allais S
    BMC Genomics; 2023 May; 24(1):271. PubMed ID: 37208589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. LOLA: enrichment analysis for genomic region sets and regulatory elements in R and Bioconductor.
    Sheffield NC; Bock C
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(4):587-9. PubMed ID: 26508757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EpiCompare: an online tool to define and explore genomic regions with tissue or cell type-specific epigenomic features.
    He Y; Wang T
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Oct; 33(20):3268-3275. PubMed ID: 28605501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficiency and power as a function of sequence coverage, SNP array density, and imputation.
    Flannick J; Korn JM; Fontanillas P; Grant GB; Banks E; Depristo MA; Altshuler D
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2012; 8(7):e1002604. PubMed ID: 22807667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.