These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31683351)
21. Biomechanical Comparison of Suture Techniques in Radial Meniscal Tears Using Gap Configuration Analysis. Lee SS; Lee MC; Lee JH; Kim TW Orthopedics; 2019 Sep; 42(5):e443-e448. PubMed ID: 31408521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Three single loops enhance the biomechanical behavior of the transtibial pull-out technique for posterior meniscal root repair. Camarda L; Pitarresi G; Lauria M; Fazzari F; D'Arienzo M Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Sep; 137(9):1301-1306. PubMed ID: 28674738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biomechanical evaluation of meniscal repair systems: a comparison of the Meniscal Viper Repair System, the vertical mattress FasT-Fix Device, and vertical mattress ethibond sutures. Chang HC; Nyland J; Caborn DN; Burden R Am J Sports Med; 2005 Dec; 33(12):1846-52. PubMed ID: 16157854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparable Outcomes After Bucket-Handle Meniscal Repair and Vertical Meniscal Repair Can Be Achieved at a Minimum 2 Years' Follow-up. Moatshe G; Cinque ME; Godin JA; Vap AR; Chahla J; LaPrade RF Am J Sports Med; 2017 Nov; 45(13):3104-3110. PubMed ID: 28806092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Strength of Transosseous Medial Meniscal Root Repair Using a Simple Suture Technique Is Dependent on Suture Material and Position. Robinson JR; Frank EG; Hunter AJ; Jermin PJ; Gill HS Am J Sports Med; 2018 Mar; 46(4):924-932. PubMed ID: 29364699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A biomechanical evaluation of all-inside 2-stitch meniscal repair devices with matched inside-out suture repair. Ramappa AJ; Chen A; Hertz B; Wexler M; Grimaldi Bournissaint L; DeAngelis JP; Nazarian A Am J Sports Med; 2014 Jan; 42(1):194-9. PubMed ID: 24114752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Medial Meniscal Root Avulsion: A Biomechanical Comparison of 4 Different Repair Constructs. Mitchell R; Pitts R; Kim YM; Matava MJ Arthroscopy; 2016 Jan; 32(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 26422709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cyclic test comparison of all-inside device and inside-out sutures for radial meniscus lesion repair: an in vitro porcine model study. Lee YH; Nyland J; Burden R; Caborn DN Arthroscopy; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1873-81. PubMed ID: 23085200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis of a new all-inside versus inside-out technique for repairing radial meniscal tears. Beamer BS; Masoudi A; Walley KC; Harlow ER; Manoukian OS; Hertz B; Haeussler C; Olson JJ; Deangelis JP; Nazarian A; Ramappa AJ Arthroscopy; 2015 Feb; 31(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 25312766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Effect of various suture strength factors on behavior of meniscus sutures in cyclic loading conditions]. Seil R; Rupp S; Jurecka C; Rein R; Kohn D Unfallchirurg; 2001 May; 104(5):392-8. PubMed ID: 11413954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system with vertical mattress sutures and meniscus arrows. Borden P; Nyland J; Caborn DN; Pienkowski D Am J Sports Med; 2003; 31(3):374-8. PubMed ID: 12750129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]