These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31684791)

  • 1. Erroneous computer-based interpretations of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in a Swedish primary health care setting.
    Lindow T; Kron J; Thulesius H; Ljungström E; Pahlm O
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2019 Dec; 37(4):426-433. PubMed ID: 31684791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Misdiagnosis of atrial fibrillation and its clinical consequences.
    Bogun F; Anh D; Kalahasty G; Wissner E; Bou Serhal C; Bazzi R; Weaver WD; Schuger C
    Am J Med; 2004 Nov; 117(9):636-42. PubMed ID: 15501200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation by cardiologists in the setting of incorrect computer analysis.
    Anh D; Krishnan S; Bogun F
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 16777525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrocardiographic differentiation of atrial flutter from atrial fibrillation by physicians.
    Knight BP; Michaud GF; Strickberger SA; Morady F
    J Electrocardiol; 1999 Oct; 32(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 10549907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of diagnosing atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation from a surface electrocardiogram by hospital physicians: analysis of data from internal medicine departments.
    Shiyovich A; Wolak A; Yacobovich L; Grosbard A; Katz A
    Am J Med Sci; 2010 Oct; 340(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 20881756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithm for the identification of patients with atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm: a retrospective analysis of outcome prediction.
    Attia ZI; Noseworthy PA; Lopez-Jimenez F; Asirvatham SJ; Deshmukh AJ; Gersh BJ; Carter RE; Yao X; Rabinstein AA; Erickson BJ; Kapa S; Friedman PA
    Lancet; 2019 Sep; 394(10201):861-867. PubMed ID: 31378392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Erroneous computer electrocardiogram interpretation of atrial fibrillation and its clinical consequences.
    Hwan Bae M; Hoon Lee J; Heon Yang D; Sik Park H; Cho Y; Chull Chae S; Jun JE
    Clin Cardiol; 2012 Jun; 35(6):348-53. PubMed ID: 22644921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Criteria for the electrocardiographic diagnosis of atrial flutter improve diagnostic accuracy.
    Weinberg KM; Denes P; Kadish AH; Goldberger JJ
    Am J Med; 2007 Sep; 120(9):814-8. PubMed ID: 17765052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic performance of a computer-based ECG rhythm algorithm.
    Poon K; Okin PM; Kligfield P
    J Electrocardiol; 2005 Jul; 38(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 16003708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biatrial electrograms during coarse atrial fibrillation and flutter-fibrillation.
    Leier CV; Schaal SF
    Am Heart J; 1980 Mar; 99(3):331-41. PubMed ID: 7355696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Causes of errors in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of atrial fibrillation by physicians.
    Davidenko JM; Snyder LS
    J Electrocardiol; 2007; 40(5):450-6. PubMed ID: 17320898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Computerized ECG: Friend and Foe.
    Smulyan H
    Am J Med; 2019 Feb; 132(2):153-160. PubMed ID: 30205084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic detection of atrial fibrillation and flutter by wave rectification method.
    Christov I; Bortolan G; Daskalov I
    J Med Eng Technol; 2001; 25(5):217-21. PubMed ID: 11695663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patients with atrial fibrillation and an alternative primary diagnosis in the emergency department: a description of their characteristics and outcomes.
    Atzema CL; Lam K; Young C; Kester-Greene N
    Acad Emerg Med; 2013 Feb; 20(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 23406079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic atrial fibrillation and flutter detection by a handheld ECG recorder, and utility of sequential finger and precordial recordings.
    Brito R; Mondouagne LP; Stettler C; Combescure C; Burri H
    J Electrocardiol; 2018; 51(6):1135-1140. PubMed ID: 30497745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multifocal atrial arrhythmia--a frequent misdiagnosis? A correlative study using the computerized ECG.
    Varriale P; David W; Chryssos BE
    Clin Cardiol; 1992 May; 15(5):343-6. PubMed ID: 1623654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity and specificity of handheld one lead ECG detecting atrial fibrillation in an outpatient clinic setting.
    Malmqvist J; Engdahl J; Sjölund G; Doliwa P
    J Electrocardiol; 2024; 83():106-110. PubMed ID: 38412780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Class IC antiarrhythmic drug induced atrial flutter: electrocardiographic and electrophysiological findings and their importance for long term outcome after right atrial isthmus ablation.
    Nabar A; Rodriguez LM; Timmermans C; van Mechelen R; Wellens HJ
    Heart; 2001 Apr; 85(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 11250970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated discrimination between atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in the resting 12-lead electrocardiogram.
    Taha B; Reddy S; Xue Q; Swiryn S
    J Electrocardiol; 2000; 33 Suppl():123-5. PubMed ID: 11265711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Emergency Department Patients With Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter and an Acute Underlying Medical Illness May Not Benefit From Attempts to Control Rate or Rhythm.
    Scheuermeyer FX; Pourvali R; Rowe BH; Grafstein E; Heslop C; MacPhee J; McGrath L; Ward J; Heilbron B; Christenson J
    Ann Emerg Med; 2015 May; 65(5):511-522.e2. PubMed ID: 25441768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.