475 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31684917)
1. Surface-projection-based transperineal cognitive fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate: an original technique with a good cancer detection rate.
Wang L; Wang X; Zhao W; Zhao Z; Li Z; Fei S; Zhu H; Ji X; Yang B; Li N; Na Y
BMC Urol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):107. PubMed ID: 31684917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of free-hand transperineal mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy with transperineal 12-core systematic biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a single-center prospective study in China.
Zhang Q; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Fu Y; Li D; Guo S; Zhang S; Huang H; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H
Int Urol Nephrol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):439-448. PubMed ID: 28005230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of free-hand transperineal targeted prostate biopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion in Chinese men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen.
Lian H; Zhuang J; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Li D; Fu Y; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H
BMC Urol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28679370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Free-hand transperineal targeted prostate biopsy with real-time fusion imaging of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound: single-center experience in China.
Zhang Q; Wang W; Yang R; Zhang G; Zhang B; Li W; Huang H; Guo H
Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 May; 47(5):727-33. PubMed ID: 25820744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic and MRI-Cognitive Targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Accuracy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer after Previous Negative Biopsy and Persisting Suspicion of Malignancy.
Vėželis A; Platkevičius G; Kinčius M; Gumbys L; Naruševičiūtė I; Briedienė R; Petroška D; Ulys A; Jankevičius F
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Jan; 57(1):. PubMed ID: 33435132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective study of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US)-fusion targeted biopsy and concurrent systematic transperineal biopsy with the average of 18-cores to detect clinically significant prostate cancer.
Hakozaki Y; Matsushima H; Kumagai J; Murata T; Masuda T; Hirai Y; Oda M; Kawauchi N; Yokoyama M; Homma Y
BMC Urol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):117. PubMed ID: 29233150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure.
Cash H; Günzel K; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Miller K; Asbach P; Haas M; Kempkensteffen C
BJU Int; 2016 Jul; 118(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26384851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Targeted vs systematic robot-assisted transperineal magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasonography fusion prostate biopsy.
Mischinger J; Kaufmann S; Russo GI; Harland N; Rausch S; Amend B; Scharpf M; Loewe L; Todenhoefer T; Notohamiprodjo M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Bedke J; Kruck S
BJU Int; 2018 May; 121(5):791-798. PubMed ID: 29211932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transrectal ultrasound examination of prostate cancer guided by fusion imaging of multiparametric MRI and TRUS: avoiding unnecessary mpMRI-guided targeted biopsy.
Xu G; Li JH; Xiang LH; Yang B; Chen YC; Sun YK; Zhao BH; Wu J; Sun LP; Xu HX
Asian J Androl; 2023; 25(3):410-415. PubMed ID: 36348578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy of the prostate.
Maxeiner A; Kittner B; Blobel C; Wiemer L; Hofbauer SL; Fischer T; Asbach P; Haas M; Penzkofer T; Fuller F; Miller K; Cash H
BJU Int; 2018 Aug; 122(2):211-218. PubMed ID: 29569320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A cohort of transperineal electromagnetically tracked magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy: assessing the impact of inter-reader variability on cancer detection.
Wajswol E; Winoker JS; Anastos H; Falagario U; Okhawere K; Martini A; Treacy PJ; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):531-540. PubMed ID: 31762182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Targeted Biopsy with Four Cores Versus Target Saturation Biopsy with Nine Cores in Transperineal Prostate Fusion Biopsy: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Saner YM; Wiesenfarth M; Weru V; Ladyzhensky B; Tschirdewahn S; Püllen L; Bonekamp D; Reis H; Krafft U; Heß J; Kesch C; Darr C; Forsting M; Wetter A; Umutlu L; Haubold J; Hadaschik B; Radtke JP
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Feb; 6(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 36175281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Targeted multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound-guided (mpMRI/TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy versus systematic random prostate biopsy: A comparative real-life study.
Pham THN; Schulze-Hagen MF; Rahnama'i MS
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2024 Feb; 7(2):e1962. PubMed ID: 38217298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Multicentre Analysis of the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Following Transperineal Image-fusion Targeted and Nontargeted Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men at Risk.
Miah S; Hosking-Jervis F; Connor MJ; Eldred-Evans D; Shah TT; Arya M; Barber N; Bhardwa J; Bott S; Burke D; Doherty A; Foster C; Freeman A; Hindley R; Jameson C; Karim O; Laniado M; Montgomery B; Nigam R; Punwani S; Sinclair A; Winkler M; Allen C; Ahmed HU
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Jun; 3(3):262-269. PubMed ID: 31411968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Additive Value of Transrectal Systematic Ventral Biopsies in Combination with Magnet Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy in Patients with 3 or More Negative Prostate Biopsies.
Maxeiner A; Nest AM; Stephan C; Cash H; Baur ADJ; Fischer T; Kilic E; Piper SK; Nowak CP; Busch J; Miller K; Mang J
Urol Int; 2020; 104(3-4):205-213. PubMed ID: 31801153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiparametric MRI-ultrasonography software fusion prostate biopsy: initial results using a stereotactic robotic-assisted transperineal prostate biopsy platform comparing systematic vs targeted biopsy.
Lee AYM; Yang XY; Lee HJ; Law YM; Huang HH; Lau WKO; Lee LS; Ho HSS; Tay KJ; Cheng CWS; Yuen JSP; Chen K
BJU Int; 2020 Nov; 126(5):568-576. PubMed ID: 32438463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer Using Target Saturation in Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasonography-fusion Biopsy.
Tschirdewahn S; Wiesenfarth M; Bonekamp D; Püllen L; Reis H; Panic A; Kesch C; Darr C; Heß J; Giganti F; Moore CM; Guberina N; Forsting M; Wetter A; Hadaschik B; Radtke JP
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1300-1307. PubMed ID: 32660838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Infection rate and complications after 621 transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion biopsies in local anesthesia without standard antibiotic prophylaxis.
Günzel K; Magheli A; Baco E; Cash H; Heinrich S; Neubert H; Schlegel J; Schostak M; Henkel T; Asbach P; Hinz S
World J Urol; 2021 Oct; 39(10):3861-3866. PubMed ID: 33866401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Value of MRI/ultrasound fusion in primary biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer].
Distler F; Radtke JP; Kesch C; Roethke M; Schlemmer HP; Roth W; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik B
Urologe A; 2016 Feb; 55(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 26556268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
