These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31686287)

  • 1. Effects of DTL electrode position on the amplitude and implicit time of the electroretinogram.
    Brouwer AH; de Wit GC; de Boer JH; van Genderen MM
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2020 Jun; 140(3):201-209. PubMed ID: 31686287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between Dawson, Trick, and Litzkow electrode and contact lens electrodes used in clinical electroretinography.
    Kuze M; Uji Y
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2000; 44(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 10974293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing DTL microfiber and Neuroline skin electrode in the Mini Ganzfeld ERG.
    Lapkovska A; Palmowski-Wolfe AM; Todorova MG
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 16():137. PubMed ID: 27491453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of varying skin surface electrode position on electroretinogram responses recorded using a handheld stimulating and recording system.
    Hobby AE; Kozareva D; Yonova-Doing E; Hossain IT; Katta M; Huntjens B; Hammond CJ; Binns AM; Mahroo OA
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 137(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 30046929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ERG electrode in pediatric patients: comparison of DTL fiber, PVA-gel, and non-corneal skin electrodes.
    Coupland SG; Janaky M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1989 Apr; 71(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 2791850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variability of the multifocal electroretinogram based on the type and position of the electrode.
    García-García Á; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Rebolleda G
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 133(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 27665467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of different recording parameters to establish a standard for flash electroretinography in rodents.
    Bayer AU; Cook P; Brodie SE; Maag KP; Mittag T
    Vision Res; 2001 Aug; 41(17):2173-85. PubMed ID: 11448710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inter-subject, inter-ocular and inter-session repeatability of the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram recorded using DTL and skin electrodes.
    Mortlock KE; Binns AM; Aldebasi YH; North RV
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2010 Oct; 121(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 20607349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amplitude scaling relationships of Burian-Allen, gold foil and Dawson, Trick and Litzkow electrodes.
    Hennessy MP; Vaegan
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1995; 89(3):235-48. PubMed ID: 7555591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of the DTL electrode compared to the jet contact lens electrode in clinical testing.
    Yin H; Pardue MT
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 Jan; 108(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 15104170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The DTL ERG electrode comes in different shapes and sizes: Are they all good?
    Woo J; Jung S; Gauvin M; Lachapelle P
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 135(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 28741115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of DTL and gold cup skin electrodes for recordings of the multifocal electroretinogram.
    Eckermann T; Hoffmann MB; Al-Nosairy KO
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 146(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 36536110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of recording electrode type and reference electrode position on the canine electroretinogram.
    Mentzer AE; Eifler DM; Montiani-Ferreira F; Tuntivanich N; Forcier JQ; Petersen-Jones SM
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2005 Sep; 111(2):95-106. PubMed ID: 16514491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The importance of electrode position in visual electrophysiology.
    Kurtenbach A; Kramer S; Strasser T; Zrenner E; Langrová H
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 134(2):129-134. PubMed ID: 28224239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recording the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram with the DTL electrode.
    Lachapelle P; Benoit J; Little JM; Lachapelle B
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1993; 83(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 8334927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of light- and dark-adapted ERGs using a mydriasis-free, portable system: clinical classifications and normative data.
    Liu H; Ji X; Dhaliwal S; Rahman SN; McFarlane M; Tumber A; Locke J; Wright T; Vincent A; Westall C
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 137(3):169-181. PubMed ID: 30357588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hand-held, dilation-free, electroretinography in children under 3 years of age treated with vigabatrin.
    Ji X; McFarlane M; Liu H; Dupuis A; Westall CA
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 138(3):195-203. PubMed ID: 30826910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of performance and patient satisfaction of two types of ERG electrodes.
    Beeler P; Barthelmes D; Sutter FK; Helbig H; Fleischhauer JC
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Apr; 224(4):265-8. PubMed ID: 17458789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Full-field electroretinogram in autism spectrum disorder.
    Constable PA; Gaigg SB; Bowler DM; Jägle H; Thompson DA
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 132(2):83-99. PubMed ID: 26868825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel method to reduce noise in electroretinography using skin electrodes: a study of noise level, inter-session variability, and reproducibility.
    Yamashita T; Miki A; Tabuchi A; Funada H; Kondo M
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 37(2):317-324. PubMed ID: 27278187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.