643 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31686300)
1. A method for the automated classification of benign and malignant masses on digital breast tomosynthesis images using machine learning and radiomic features.
Sakai A; Onishi Y; Matsui M; Adachi H; Teramoto A; Saito K; Fujita H
Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Mar; 13(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 31686300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multi-domain features for reducing false positives in automated detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Zhang F; Wu S; Zhang C; Chen Q; Yang X; Jiang K; Zheng J
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1300-1308. PubMed ID: 30661242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transfer Learning From Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Diagnosis: A Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography.
Mendel K; Li H; Sheth D; Giger M
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):735-743. PubMed ID: 30076083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiomics based detection and characterization of suspicious lesions on full field digital mammograms.
Sapate SG; Mahajan A; Talbar SN; Sable N; Desai S; Thakur M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():1-20. PubMed ID: 30119844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multi-scale textural feature extraction and particle swarm optimization based model selection for false positive reduction in mammography.
Zyout I; Czajkowska J; Grzegorzek M
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():95-107. PubMed ID: 25795630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of machine learning in projection views and reconstructed slices.
Chan HP; Wu YT; Sahiner B; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhang Y; Moore RH; Kopans DB; Hadjiiski L; Way T
Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3576-86. PubMed ID: 20831065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided diagnosis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: A feasibility study.
Patel BK; Ranjbar S; Wu T; Pockaj BA; Li J; Zhang N; Lobbes M; Zhang B; Mitchell JR
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():207-213. PubMed ID: 29279165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of breast mass classification using sequential forward floating selection (SFFS) and a support vector machine (SVM) model.
Tan M; Pu J; Zheng B
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2014 Nov; 9(6):1005-20. PubMed ID: 24664267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiomics robustness assessment and classification evaluation: A two-stage method demonstrated on multivendor FFDM.
Robinson K; Li H; Lan L; Schacht D; Giger M
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2145-2156. PubMed ID: 30802972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpretable Radiomic Signature for Breast Microcalcification Detection and Classification.
Prinzi F; Orlando A; Gaglio S; Vitabile S
J Imaging Inform Med; 2024 Jun; 37(3):1038-1053. PubMed ID: 38351223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Added Value of Radiomics on Mammography for Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Feasibility Study.
Mao N; Yin P; Wang Q; Liu M; Dong J; Zhang X; Xie H; Hong N
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Apr; 16(4 Pt A):485-491. PubMed ID: 30528092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: integration of image modalities enhances deep learning-based breast mass classification.
Li X; Qin G; He Q; Sun L; Zeng H; He Z; Chen W; Zhen X; Zhou L
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):778-788. PubMed ID: 31691121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extreme Learning Machine (ELM)-Based Classification of Benign and Malignant Cells in Breast Cancer.
Toprak A
Med Sci Monit; 2018 Sep; 24():6537-6543. PubMed ID: 30222727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative comparison of clustered microcalcifications in for-presentation and for-processing mammograms in full-field digital mammography.
Wang J; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3726-3738. PubMed ID: 28477395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fully automated nipple detection in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Chae SH; Jeong JW; Choi JH; Chae EY; Kim HH; Choi YW; Lee S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():113-120. PubMed ID: 28391808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of machine learning software to classify breast lesions using BI-RADS radiomic features on ultrasound images.
Fleury E; Marcomini K
Eur Radiol Exp; 2019 Aug; 3(1):34. PubMed ID: 31385114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hybrid cosine and Radon transform-based processing for digital mammogram feature extraction and classification with SVM.
Lahmiri S; Boukadoum M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():5104-7. PubMed ID: 22255487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A minimum spanning forest based classification method for dedicated breast CT images.
Pike R; Sechopoulos I; Fei B
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6190-202. PubMed ID: 26520712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-assisted lip diagnosis on Traditional Chinese Medicine using multi-class support vector machines.
Li F; Zhao C; Xia Z; Wang Y; Zhou X; Li GZ
BMC Complement Altern Med; 2012 Aug; 12():127. PubMed ID: 22898352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
