212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31687186)
1. The effect of miniaturized manual versus mechanical instruments on calculus removal and root surface characteristics: An in vitro light microscopic study.
Profili F; Sparabombe S; Tawse Smith A; D'Isidoro O; Quaranta A
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2019 Oct; 5(5):519-527. PubMed ID: 31687186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effectiveness of scaling and root planing with curets designed for deep pockets.
Nagy RJ; Otomo-Corgel J; Stambaugh R
J Periodontol; 1992 Dec; 63(12):954-9. PubMed ID: 1474467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of the speed and effectiveness of subgingival calculus removal on single-rooted teeth with diamond-coated ultrasonic tips.
Yukna RA; Scott JB; Aichelmann-Reidy ME; LeBlanc DM; Mayer ET
J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 9182738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo and in vitro effects of an Er:YAG laser, a GaAlAs diode laser, and scaling and root planing on periodontally diseased root surfaces: a comparative histologic study.
Schwarz F; Sculean A; Berakdar M; Szathmari L; Georg T; Becker J
Lasers Surg Med; 2003; 32(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 12766958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of root planing procedures with hand instrument or erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser irradiation on the root surfaces: a comparative scanning electron microscopy study.
Hakki SS; Berk G; Dundar N; Saglam M; Berk N
Lasers Med Sci; 2010 May; 25(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 19219484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Calculus removal from multirooted teeth with and without surgical access. (I). Efficacy on external and furcation surfaces in relation to probing depth.
Parashis AO; Anagnou-Vareltzides A; Demetriou N
J Clin Periodontol; 1993 Jan; 20(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 8421119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical and chemical root preparation in vitro: efficiency of plaque and calculus removal.
Eschler BM; Rapley JW
J Periodontol; 1991 Dec; 62(12):755-60. PubMed ID: 1722511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Total calculus removal: an attainable objective?
Kepic TJ; O'Leary TJ; Kafrawy AH
J Periodontol; 1990 Jan; 61(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 2179511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Root surface alterations following manual and mechanical scaling: A comparative study.
Maritato M; Orazi L; Laurito D; Formisano G; Serra E; Lollobrigida M; Molinari A; De Biase A
Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 Nov; 16(4):553-558. PubMed ID: 29797806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?
Drisko CH
Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus.
Breininger DR; O'Leary TJ; Blumenshine RV
J Periodontol; 1987 Jan; 58(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 3543285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histological and profilometric evaluation of the root surface after instrumentation with a new piezoelectric device - ex vivo study.
Silva D; Martins O; Matos S; Lopes P; Rolo T; Baptista I
Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 May; 13(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 24995862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Root surface debridement and endotoxin removal.
Cadosch J; Zimmermann U; Ruppert M; Guindy J; Case D; Zappa U
J Periodontal Res; 2003 Jun; 38(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 12753358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Er:YAG laser scaling of diseased root surfaces.
Frentzen M; Braun A; Aniol D
J Periodontol; 2002 May; 73(5):524-30. PubMed ID: 12027255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planning. I. Clinical detection of residual calculus.
Sherman PR; Hutchens LH; Jewson LG; Moriarty JM; Greco GW; McFall WT
J Periodontol; 1990 Jan; 61(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 2179512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative scanning electron microscopy study between the effect of an ultrasonic scaler, reciprocating handpiece, and combined approach on the root surface topography in subgingival debridement.
Dassatti L; Manicone PF; Lauricella S; Pastorino R; Filetici P; Nicoletti F; D'Addona A
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2020 Aug; 6(4):470-477. PubMed ID: 32573120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of the angle of instrumentation of the Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Scaler on root surfaces.
Oliveira G; Macedo PD; Tsurumaki JN; Sampaio JE; Marcantonio R
Int J Dent Hyg; 2016 Aug; 14(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 25690687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The clinical effectiveness of open versus closed scaling and root planing on multi-rooted teeth.
Wylam JM; Mealey BL; Mills MP; Waldrop TC; Moskowicz DC
J Periodontol; 1993 Nov; 64(11):1023-8. PubMed ID: 8295086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study on the effect of ultrasonic instruments on the root surface in vivo.
Santos FA; Pochapski MT; Leal PC; Gimenes-Sakima PP; Marcantonio E
Clin Oral Investig; 2008 Jun; 12(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 18060565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro comparative study of a reciprocating scaler for root surface debridement.
Lee A; Heasman PA; Kelly PJ
J Dent; 1996; 24(1-2):81-6. PubMed ID: 8636498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
