These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31687186)

  • 21. Preservation of root cementum: a comparative evaluation of power-driven versus hand instruments.
    Bozbay E; Dominici F; Gokbuget AY; Cintan S; Guida L; Aydin MS; Mariotti A; Pilloni A
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 May; 16(2):202-209. PubMed ID: 27860247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of four methods of assessing root surface debridement.
    Chan YK; Needleman IG; Clifford LR
    J Periodontol; 2000 Mar; 71(3):385-93. PubMed ID: 10776925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effectiveness of hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation in open flap root planing.
    Hunter RK; O'Leary TJ; Kafrawy AH
    J Periodontol; 1984 Dec; 55(12):697-703. PubMed ID: 6394737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vitro comparison of root surface roughness and bacterial adhesion following treatment with three different instruments.
    Haroon F; Gregory RL; Hara A; Blanchard SB; Hamada Y
    J Periodontol; 2022 May; 93(5):e83-e91. PubMed ID: 34338309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing: single versus multiple episodes of instrumentation.
    Anderson GB; Palmer JA; Bye FL; Smith BA; Caffesse RG
    J Periodontol; 1996 Apr; 67(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 8708961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The periodontally-involved root surface.
    Corbet EF; Vaughan AJ; Kieser JB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1993 Jul; 20(6):402-10. PubMed ID: 8349832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Scaling and root planing without overinstrumentation: hand versus power-driven scalers.
    Drisko CL
    Curr Opin Periodontol; 1993; ():78-88. PubMed ID: 8401851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Calculus Removal and Root Surface Roughness When Using the Er:YAG or Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Compared with Conventional Instrumentation Method: A Literature Review.
    Agoob Alfergany M; Nasher R; Gutknecht N
    Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg; 2019 Apr; 37(4):197-226. PubMed ID: 31050960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Instruments and methods for the quantitative measurement of factors affecting hygienist/dentist efforts during scaling and root planing of the teeth.
    White DJ; Cox ER; Arends J; Nieborg JH; Leydsman H; Wieringa DW; Dijkman AG; Ruben JR
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(2 Spec No):32-40. PubMed ID: 9238895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Efficacy of Carisolv as an adjunctive therapy to scaling and root planing on subgingival calculus removal.
    Grisi DC; Salvador SL; Marcantonio RA
    Braz Dent J; 2006; 17(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 17262127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative in vitro effectiveness of closed root debridement with fine instruments on specific areas of mandibular first molar furcations. I. Root trunk and furcation entrance.
    Otero-Cagide FJ; Long BA
    J Periodontol; 1997 Nov; 68(11):1093-7. PubMed ID: 9407402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effectiveness of two sonic and two ultrasonic scaler tips in furcations.
    Patterson M; Eick JD; Eberhart AB; Gross K; Killoy WJ
    J Periodontol; 1989 Jun; 60(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 2674397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo.
    Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K
    J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Er:YAG laser in defocused mode for scaling of periodontally involved root surfaces: an in vitro pilot study.
    Crespi R; Romanos GE; Barone A; Sculean A; Covani U
    J Periodontol; 2005 May; 76(5):686-90. PubMed ID: 15898927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The Perioplaner/Periopolisher. The loss of substance on the root surface and the initial clinical experiences].
    Hänggi D; Ritz L; Rateitschak KH
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1991; 101(12):1535-41. PubMed ID: 1763309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth. (I) Residual deposits.
    Kocher T; Langenbeck M; Rühling A; Plagmann HC
    J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 27(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 10783837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Loss of tooth substance during root planing with various periodontal instruments: an in vitro study.
    Obeid P; Bercy P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2005 Jun; 9(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 15838684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficiency of subgingival calculus removal with the Vector-system compared to ultrasonic scaling and hand instrumentation in vitro.
    Braun A; Krause F; Frentzen M; Jepsen S
    J Periodontal Res; 2005 Feb; 40(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 15613079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Ultrasonic instrumentation versus hand instrumentation in periodontics. A review of the literature].
    Deblauwe BM; van der Weijden GA
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1992 Jul; 99(7):239-44. PubMed ID: 11819997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Diamond burs versus curettes in root planing: a randomized clinical trial.
    Türktekin F; Buduneli N; Lappin DF; Türk T; Buduneli E
    Aust Dent J; 2018 Jun; 63(2):242-252. PubMed ID: 29432640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.