161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31691037)
1. Best methods and data to reconstruct paediatric lower limb bones for musculoskeletal modelling.
Davico G; Pizzolato C; Killen BA; Barzan M; Suwarganda EK; Lloyd DG; Carty CP
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Aug; 19(4):1225-1238. PubMed ID: 31691037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of predictive statistical shape models for paediatric lower limb bones.
Shi B; Barzan M; Nasseri A; Carty CP; Lloyd DG; Davico G; Maharaj JN; Diamond LE; Saxby DJ
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Oct; 225():107002. PubMed ID: 35882107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reconstruction of the lower limb bones from digitised anatomical landmarks using statistical shape modelling.
Nolte D; Ko ST; Bull AMJ; Kedgley AE
Gait Posture; 2020 Mar; 77():269-275. PubMed ID: 32092603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimal medical imaging can accurately reconstruct geometric bone models for musculoskeletal models.
Suwarganda EK; Diamond LE; Lloyd DG; Besier TF; Zhang J; Killen BA; Savage TN; Saxby DJ
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0205628. PubMed ID: 30742643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and validation of statistical shape models of the primary functional bone segments of the foot.
Grant TM; Diamond LE; Pizzolato C; Killen BA; Devaprakash D; Kelly L; Maharaj JN; Saxby DJ
PeerJ; 2020; 8():e8397. PubMed ID: 32117607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical shape modelling versus linear scaling: Effects on predictions of hip joint centre location and muscle moment arms in people with hip osteoarthritis.
Bahl JS; Zhang J; Killen BA; Taylor M; Solomon LB; Arnold JB; Lloyd DG; Besier TF; Thewlis D
J Biomech; 2019 Mar; 85():164-172. PubMed ID: 30770197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and Reliability of Marker-Based Approaches to Scale the Pelvis, Thigh, and Shank Segments in Musculoskeletal Models.
Kainz H; Hoang HX; Stockton C; Boyd RR; Lloyd DG; Carty CP
J Appl Biomech; 2017 Oct; 33(5):354-360. PubMed ID: 28290736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subject-specific musculoskeletal model of the lower limb in a lying and standing position.
Hausselle J; Assi A; El Helou A; Jolivet E; Pillet H; Dion E; Bonneau D; Skalli W
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014 Apr; 17(5):480-7. PubMed ID: 22731619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A hybrid statistical morphometry free-form deformation approach to 3D personalized foot-ankle models.
Xiang L; Gu Y; Shim V; Yeung T; Wang A; Fernandez J
J Biomech; 2024 May; 168():112120. PubMed ID: 38677027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting the hip joint centre in children: New regression equations, linear scaling, and statistical shape modelling.
Carman L; Besier TF; Choisne J
J Biomech; 2022 Sep; 142():111265. PubMed ID: 36027636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Morphological variation in paediatric lower limb bones.
Carman L; Besier TF; Choisne J
Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):3251. PubMed ID: 35228607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Generic scaled versus subject-specific models for the calculation of musculoskeletal loading in cerebral palsy gait: Effect of personalized musculoskeletal geometry outweighs the effect of personalized neural control.
Kainz H; Wesseling M; Jonkers I
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2021 Jul; 87():105402. PubMed ID: 34098149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An articulated shape model to predict paediatric lower limb bone geometry using sparse landmarks.
Carman L; Besier TF; Rooks NB; Choisne J
J Biomech; 2024 Jun; 172():112211. PubMed ID: 38955093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-linear scaling of a musculoskeletal model of the lower limb using statistical shape models.
Nolte D; Tsang CK; Zhang KY; Ding Z; Kedgley AE; Bull AMJ
J Biomech; 2016 Oct; 49(14):3576-3581. PubMed ID: 27653375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Statistical shape model-based reconstruction of a scaled, patient-specific surface model of the pelvis from a single standard AP x-ray radiograph.
Zheng G
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1424-39. PubMed ID: 20443464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated creation and tuning of personalised muscle paths for OpenSim musculoskeletal models of the knee joint.
Killen BA; Brito da Luz S; Lloyd DG; Carleton AD; Zhang J; Besier TF; Saxby DJ
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2021 Apr; 20(2):521-533. PubMed ID: 33098487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity of femoral strain calculations to anatomical scaling errors in musculoskeletal models of movement.
Martelli S; Kersh ME; Pandy MG
J Biomech; 2015 Oct; 48(13):3606-15. PubMed ID: 26315919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Torsion Tool: An automated tool for personalising femoral and tibial geometries in OpenSim musculoskeletal models.
Veerkamp K; Kainz H; Killen BA; Jónasdóttir H; van der Krogt MM
J Biomech; 2021 Aug; 125():110589. PubMed ID: 34218040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A multi-scale modelling framework combining musculoskeletal rigid-body simulations with adaptive finite element analyses, to evaluate the impact of femoral geometry on hip joint contact forces and femoral bone growth.
Kainz H; Killen BA; Wesseling M; Perez-Boerema F; Pitto L; Garcia Aznar JM; Shefelbine S; Jonkers I
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235966. PubMed ID: 32702015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An Anatomical Atlas-Based Scaling Study for Quantifying Muscle and Hip Joint Contact Forces in Above and Through-Knee Amputees Using Validated Musculoskeletal Modelling.
Toderita D; Henson DP; Klemt C; Ding Z; Bull AMJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 Nov; 68(11):3447-3456. PubMed ID: 33886465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
