BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31691118)

  • 21. Ligament shortening compared to vaginal colpopexy at the time of hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Fairchild PS; Kamdar NS; Rosen ER; Swenson CW; Fenner DE; DeLancey JO; Morgan DM
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jun; 28(6):899-905. PubMed ID: 27858132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage.
    Lavelle ES; Giugale LE; Winger DG; Wang L; Carter-Brooks CM; Shepherd JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):116.e1-116.e5. PubMed ID: 28951262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Long-term outcomes of the high vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension in treatment of the severe pelvic organ prolapse].
    Lu YX; Wang J; Shen WJ; Zhang YH; Liu JX; Zhao Y; Ge J; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 48(8):564-9. PubMed ID: 24199919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy: An Innovative Approach for Treatment of Uterine Prolapse.
    Lowenstein L; Ben-David C; Mick I; Levi G; Matanes E; Mor O
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1818-1819. PubMed ID: 34171475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension and sacral colpopexy: results and complications.
    Filmar GA; Fisher HW; Aranda E; Lotze PM
    Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1645-53. PubMed ID: 24819328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.
    Ow LL; Lim YN; Lee J; Murray C; Thomas E; Leitch A; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].
    Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recurrent apical prolapse after high uterosacral ligament suspension - in a heterogenous cohort characterised by a high prevalence of previous pelvic operations.
    Pedersen KD; Storkholm MH; Bek KM; Glavind-Kristensen M; Greisen S
    BMC Womens Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):96. PubMed ID: 31299946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Brubaker L; Norton P; Gantz M; Richter HE; Weidner A; Menefee S; Schaffer J; Pugh N; Meikle S;
    JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of modified laparoscopic hysterectomy on pelvic floor function: A retrospective observational study.
    Lee CY; Tseng CJ; Chang CH; Lee MC; Ou YC; Yang SF
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Feb; 98(8):e14616. PubMed ID: 30813190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laparoscopic Bilateral Cervicosacropexy and Vaginosacropexy: New Surgical Treatment Option in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence.
    Rexhepi S; Rexhepi E; Stumm M; Mallmann P; Ludwig S
    J Endourol; 2018 Nov; 32(11):1058-1064. PubMed ID: 30244596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
    Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. vNOTES Hysterectomy, Adnexectomy, and Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Walk-Through Guide.
    Zakhari A; Nguyen DB; Smith JP; Mansour FW; Krishnamurthy S
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 29(10):1134-1135. PubMed ID: 35788395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modified extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension for prevention of vault prolapse after vaginal hysterectomy.
    Pal M; Bandyopadhyay S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):633-637. PubMed ID: 29777272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Advanced utero-vaginal prolapse and vaginal vault suspension: synthetic mesh vs native tissue repair.
    Cosma S; Menato G; Preti M; Petruzzelli P; Tin MC; Riboni F; Benedetto C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 May; 289(5):1053-60. PubMed ID: 24305747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Vaginal intraperitoneal versus extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament vault suspensions: a comparison of a standard and novel approach.
    Mounir D; Vasquez-Tran NO; Lindo FM; Antosh DD; Muir TW
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Apr; 32(4):913-918. PubMed ID: 32757022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Outcomes of Transvaginal High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension: Over 500-Patient Single-Center Study.
    Milani R; Frigerio M; Cola A; Beretta C; Spelzini F; Manodoro S
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 28230565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [UTEROSACRAL VERSUS SACROSPINOUS LIGAMENT FIXATION FOLLOWING VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE].
    Nasser-Saman D; Yonis G; Haya N; Lavie O; Abramov Y
    Harefuah; 2022 Jun; 161(6):342-348. PubMed ID: 35734789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.