These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Performance of five research-domain automated WM lesion segmentation methods in a multi-center MS study. de Sitter A; Steenwijk MD; Ruet A; Versteeg A; Liu Y; van Schijndel RA; Pouwels PJW; Kilsdonk ID; Cover KS; van Dijk BW; Ropele S; Rocca MA; Yiannakas M; Wattjes MP; Damangir S; Frisoni GB; Sastre-Garriga J; Rovira A; Enzinger C; Filippi M; Frederiksen J; Ciccarelli O; Kappos L; Barkhof F; Vrenken H; Neuroimage; 2017 Dec; 163():106-114. PubMed ID: 28899746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Agreement between different input image types in brain atrophy measurement in multiple sclerosis using SIENAX and SIENA. Neacsu V; Jasperse B; Korteweg T; Knol DL; Valsasina P; Filippi M; Barkhof F; Rovaris M; Vrenken H; J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):559-65. PubMed ID: 18777529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. De-identification procedures for magnetic resonance images and the impact on structural brain measures at different ages. Buimer EEL; Schnack HG; Caspi Y; van Haren NEM; Milchenko M; Pas P; ; Hulshoff Pol HE; Brouwer RM Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Aug; 42(11):3643-3655. PubMed ID: 33973694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility evaluation of the effects of MRI defacing on brain segmentation. Gao C; Landman BA; Prince JL; Carass A J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2023 Nov; 10(6):064001. PubMed ID: 38074632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Training labels for hippocampal segmentation based on the EADC-ADNI harmonized hippocampal protocol. Boccardi M; Bocchetta M; Morency FC; Collins DL; Nishikawa M; Ganzola R; Grothe MJ; Wolf D; Redolfi A; Pievani M; Antelmi L; Fellgiebel A; Matsuda H; Teipel S; Duchesne S; Jack CR; Frisoni GB; Alzheimers Dement; 2015 Feb; 11(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 25616957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fast refacing of MR images with a generative neural network lowers re-identification risk and preserves volumetric consistency. Molchanova N; Maréchal B; Thiran JP; Kober T; Huelnhagen T; Richiardi J; Hum Brain Mapp; 2024 Jun; 45(9):e26721. PubMed ID: 38899549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A reproducibility evaluation of the effects of MRI defacing on brain segmentation. Gao C; Landman BA; Prince JL; Carass A medRxiv; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37293070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Classification of Alzheimer's disease and prediction of mild cognitive impairment-to-Alzheimer's conversion from structural magnetic resource imaging using feature ranking and a genetic algorithm. Beheshti I; Demirel H; Matsuda H; Comput Biol Med; 2017 Apr; 83():109-119. PubMed ID: 28260614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Segmentation stability of human head and neck cancer medical images for radiotherapy applications under de-identification conditions: Benchmarking data sharing and artificial intelligence use-cases. Sahlsten J; Wahid KA; Glerean E; Jaskari J; Naser MA; He R; Kann BH; Mäkitie A; Fuller CD; Kaski K Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1120392. PubMed ID: 36925936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Longitudinal Neuroimaging Hippocampal Markers for Diagnosing Alzheimer's Disease. Platero C; Lin L; Tobar MC Neuroinformatics; 2019 Jan; 17(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 29785624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changing the face of neuroimaging research: Comparing a new MRI de-facing technique with popular alternatives. Schwarz CG; Kremers WK; Wiste HJ; Gunter JL; Vemuri P; Spychalla AJ; Kantarci K; Schultz AP; Sperling RA; Knopman DS; Petersen RC; Jack CR; Neuroimage; 2021 May; 231():117845. PubMed ID: 33582276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hippocampal volume change measurement: quantitative assessment of the reproducibility of expert manual outlining and the automated methods FreeSurfer and FIRST. Mulder ER; de Jong RA; Knol DL; van Schijndel RA; Cover KS; Visser PJ; Barkhof F; Vrenken H; Neuroimage; 2014 May; 92():169-81. PubMed ID: 24521851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A technique for the deidentification of structural brain MR images. Bischoff-Grethe A; Ozyurt IB; Busa E; Quinn BT; Fennema-Notestine C; Clark CP; Morris S; Bondi MW; Jernigan TL; Dale AM; Brown GG; Fischl B Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Sep; 28(9):892-903. PubMed ID: 17295313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. De-Identification of Facial Features in Magnetic Resonance Images: Software Development Using Deep Learning Technology. Jeong YU; Yoo S; Kim YH; Shim WH J Med Internet Res; 2020 Dec; 22(12):e22739. PubMed ID: 33208302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]