These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31691120)

  • 1. Facing privacy in neuroimaging: removing facial features degrades performance of image analysis methods.
    de Sitter A; Visser M; Brouwer I; Cover KS; van Schijndel RA; Eijgelaar RS; Müller DMJ; Ropele S; Kappos L; Rovira Á; Filippi M; Enzinger C; Frederiksen J; Ciccarelli O; Guttmann CRG; Wattjes MP; Witte MG; de Witt Hamer PC; Barkhof F; Vrenken H;
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1062-1074. PubMed ID: 31691120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic evaluation of the impact of defacing on quality and volumetric assessments on T1-weighted MR-images.
    Bhalerao GV; Parekh P; Saini J; Venkatasubramanian G; John JP;
    J Neuroradiol; 2022 May; 49(3):250-257. PubMed ID: 33727023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing parameter choice for FSL-Brain Extraction Tool (BET) on 3D T1 images in multiple sclerosis.
    Popescu V; Battaglini M; Hoogstrate WS; Verfaillie SC; Sluimer IC; van Schijndel RA; van Dijk BW; Cover KS; Knol DL; Jenkinson M; Barkhof F; de Stefano N; Vrenken H;
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(4):1484-94. PubMed ID: 22484407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Influence of Brain MRI Defacing Algorithms on Brain-Age Predictions via 3D Convolutional Neural Networks.
    Cali RJ; Bhatt RR; Thomopoulos SI; Gadewar S; Gari IB; Chattopadhyay T; Jahanshad N; Thompson PM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-6. PubMed ID: 38082902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial normalization of multiple sclerosis brain MRI data depends on analysis method and software package.
    Pirzada S; Uddin MN; Figley TD; Kornelsen J; Puig J; Marrie RA; Mazerolle EL; Fisk JD; Helmick CA; O'Grady CB; Patel R; Figley CR;
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():83-94. PubMed ID: 32007558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of five research-domain automated WM lesion segmentation methods in a multi-center MS study.
    de Sitter A; Steenwijk MD; Ruet A; Versteeg A; Liu Y; van Schijndel RA; Pouwels PJW; Kilsdonk ID; Cover KS; van Dijk BW; Ropele S; Rocca MA; Yiannakas M; Wattjes MP; Damangir S; Frisoni GB; Sastre-Garriga J; Rovira A; Enzinger C; Filippi M; Frederiksen J; Ciccarelli O; Kappos L; Barkhof F; Vrenken H;
    Neuroimage; 2017 Dec; 163():106-114. PubMed ID: 28899746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Agreement between different input image types in brain atrophy measurement in multiple sclerosis using SIENAX and SIENA.
    Neacsu V; Jasperse B; Korteweg T; Knol DL; Valsasina P; Filippi M; Barkhof F; Rovaris M; Vrenken H;
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):559-65. PubMed ID: 18777529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. De-identification procedures for magnetic resonance images and the impact on structural brain measures at different ages.
    Buimer EEL; Schnack HG; Caspi Y; van Haren NEM; Milchenko M; Pas P; ; Hulshoff Pol HE; Brouwer RM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Aug; 42(11):3643-3655. PubMed ID: 33973694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproducibility evaluation of the effects of MRI defacing on brain segmentation.
    Gao C; Landman BA; Prince JL; Carass A
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2023 Nov; 10(6):064001. PubMed ID: 38074632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Training labels for hippocampal segmentation based on the EADC-ADNI harmonized hippocampal protocol.
    Boccardi M; Bocchetta M; Morency FC; Collins DL; Nishikawa M; Ganzola R; Grothe MJ; Wolf D; Redolfi A; Pievani M; Antelmi L; Fellgiebel A; Matsuda H; Teipel S; Duchesne S; Jack CR; Frisoni GB;
    Alzheimers Dement; 2015 Feb; 11(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 25616957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fast refacing of MR images with a generative neural network lowers re-identification risk and preserves volumetric consistency.
    Molchanova N; Maréchal B; Thiran JP; Kober T; Huelnhagen T; Richiardi J;
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2024 Jun; 45(9):e26721. PubMed ID: 38899549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A reproducibility evaluation of the effects of MRI defacing on brain segmentation.
    Gao C; Landman BA; Prince JL; Carass A
    medRxiv; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37293070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classification of Alzheimer's disease and prediction of mild cognitive impairment-to-Alzheimer's conversion from structural magnetic resource imaging using feature ranking and a genetic algorithm.
    Beheshti I; Demirel H; Matsuda H;
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Apr; 83():109-119. PubMed ID: 28260614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Segmentation stability of human head and neck cancer medical images for radiotherapy applications under de-identification conditions: Benchmarking data sharing and artificial intelligence use-cases.
    Sahlsten J; Wahid KA; Glerean E; Jaskari J; Naser MA; He R; Kann BH; Mäkitie A; Fuller CD; Kaski K
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1120392. PubMed ID: 36925936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Longitudinal Neuroimaging Hippocampal Markers for Diagnosing Alzheimer's Disease.
    Platero C; Lin L; Tobar MC
    Neuroinformatics; 2019 Jan; 17(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 29785624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changing the face of neuroimaging research: Comparing a new MRI de-facing technique with popular alternatives.
    Schwarz CG; Kremers WK; Wiste HJ; Gunter JL; Vemuri P; Spychalla AJ; Kantarci K; Schultz AP; Sperling RA; Knopman DS; Petersen RC; Jack CR;
    Neuroimage; 2021 May; 231():117845. PubMed ID: 33582276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hippocampal volume change measurement: quantitative assessment of the reproducibility of expert manual outlining and the automated methods FreeSurfer and FIRST.
    Mulder ER; de Jong RA; Knol DL; van Schijndel RA; Cover KS; Visser PJ; Barkhof F; Vrenken H;
    Neuroimage; 2014 May; 92():169-81. PubMed ID: 24521851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A technique for the deidentification of structural brain MR images.
    Bischoff-Grethe A; Ozyurt IB; Busa E; Quinn BT; Fennema-Notestine C; Clark CP; Morris S; Bondi MW; Jernigan TL; Dale AM; Brown GG; Fischl B
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Sep; 28(9):892-903. PubMed ID: 17295313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discriminative Sparse Features for Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis Using Multimodal Image Data.
    Ortiz A; Lozano F; Gorriz JM; Ramirez J; Martinez Murcia FJ;
    Curr Alzheimer Res; 2018; 15(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 28934923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. De-Identification of Facial Features in Magnetic Resonance Images: Software Development Using Deep Learning Technology.
    Jeong YU; Yoo S; Kim YH; Shim WH
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Dec; 22(12):e22739. PubMed ID: 33208302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.