221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31691376)
1. Use of surrogate species to cost-effectively prioritize conservation actions.
Ward M; Rhodes JR; Watson JEM; Lefevre J; Atkinson S; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):600-610. PubMed ID: 31691376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of threat management interactions on conservation priorities.
Auerbach NA; Wilson KA; Tulloch AI; Rhodes JR; Hanson JO; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1626-35. PubMed ID: 26171646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Metrics of progress in the understanding and management of threats to Australian birds.
Garnett ST; Butchart SHM; Baker GB; Bayraktarov E; Buchanan KL; Burbidge AA; Chauvenet ALM; Christidis L; Ehmke G; Grace M; Hoccom DG; Legge SM; Leiper I; Lindenmayer DB; Loyn RH; Maron M; McDonald P; Menkhorst P; Possingham HP; Radford J; Reside AE; Watson DM; Watson JEM; Wintle B; Woinarski JCZ; Geyle HM
Conserv Biol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):456-468. PubMed ID: 30465331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapidly assessing cobenefits to advance threat-management alliances.
Rees MW; Carwardine J; Reeson A; Firn J
Conserv Biol; 2020 Aug; 34(4):843-853. PubMed ID: 32406533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed actions: where to cost effectively manage multiple threats to species to maximize return on investment.
Auerbach NA; Tulloch AIT; Possingham HP
Ecol Appl; 2014; 24(6):1357-73. PubMed ID: 29160659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multi-action planning for threat management: a novel approach for the spatial prioritization of conservation actions.
Cattarino L; Hermoso V; Carwardine J; Kennard MJ; Linke S
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0128027. PubMed ID: 26020794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using empirical models of species colonization under multiple threatening processes to identify complementary threat-mitigation strategies.
Tulloch AI; Mortelliti A; Kay GM; Florance D; Lindenmayer D
Conserv Biol; 2016 Aug; 30(4):867-82. PubMed ID: 26711716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantifying current and potential contributions of Australian indigenous peoples to threatened species management.
Leiper I; Zander KK; Robinson CJ; Carwadine J; Moggridge BJ; Garnett ST
Conserv Biol; 2018 Oct; 32(5):1038-1047. PubMed ID: 30035336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The value of using feasibility models in systematic conservation planning to predict landholder management uptake.
Tulloch AI; Tulloch VJ; Evans MC; Mills M
Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1462-73. PubMed ID: 25382827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of risk aversion on prioritizing conservation projects.
Tulloch AI; Maloney RF; Joseph LN; Bennett JR; Di Fonzo MM; Probert WJ; O'Connor SM; Densem JP; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):513-24. PubMed ID: 25327837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rabbit biocontrol and landscape-scale recovery of threatened desert mammals.
Pedler RD; Brandle R; Read JL; Southgate R; Bird P; Moseby KE
Conserv Biol; 2016 Aug; 30(4):774-82. PubMed ID: 26852773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The biogeography of globally threatened seabirds and island conservation opportunities.
Spatz DR; Newton KM; Heinz R; Tershy B; Holmes ND; Butchart SH; Croll DA
Conserv Biol; 2014 Oct; 28(5):1282-90. PubMed ID: 24661307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prioritizing species conservation programs based on IUCN Green Status and estimates of cost-sharing potential.
Lloyd NA; Keating LM; Friesen AJ; Cole DM; McPherson JM; Akçakaya HR; Moehrenschlager A
Conserv Biol; 2023 Jun; 37(3):e14051. PubMed ID: 36661059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A framework for allocating conservation resources among multiple threats and actions.
Moore JL; Camaclang AE; Moore AL; Hauser CE; Runge MC; Picheny V; Rumpff L
Conserv Biol; 2021 Oct; 35(5):1639-1649. PubMed ID: 33909929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using abiotic variables to predict importance of sites for species representation.
Albuquerque F; Beier P
Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1390-400. PubMed ID: 25959590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Global gap analysis of cactus species and priority sites for their conservation.
Goettsch B; Durán AP; Gaston KJ
Conserv Biol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):369-376. PubMed ID: 30039592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Priority areas for conservation of and research focused on terrestrial vertebrates.
Nori J; Loyola R; Villalobos F
Conserv Biol; 2020 Oct; 34(5):1281-1291. PubMed ID: 32009235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benefits to poorly studied taxa of conservation of bird and mammal diversity on islands.
Aslan C; Holmes N; Tershy B; Spatz D; Croll DA
Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 25065901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reallocating budgets among ongoing and emerging conservation projects.
Wu CH; Dodd AJ; Hauser CE; McCarthy MA
Conserv Biol; 2021 Jun; 35(3):955-966. PubMed ID: 32648317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation.
Whitehead AL; Kujala H; Ives CD; Gordon A; Lentini PE; Wintle BA; Nicholson E; Raymond CM
Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):992-1003. PubMed ID: 24617898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
