133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31692726)
1. Accuracy of the Cone Beam Computed Tomography in the Detection of Bone Invasion in Patients with Oral Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Bombeccari GP; Candotto V; Giannì AB; Carinci F; Spadari F
Eurasian J Med; 2019 Oct; 51(3):298-306. PubMed ID: 31692726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in comparison to conventional computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of bone invasion in oral squamous cell cancer (OSCC): a prospective study.
Straub A; Linz C; Lapa C; Hartmann S; Kübler AC; Müller-Richter UDA; Faber J; Bley T; Brumberg J; Kertels O; Brands RC
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):341. PubMed ID: 38493083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of cone beam computed tomography in comparison to conventional imaging techniques for the detection of bone invasion in oral cancer.
Linz C; Müller-Richter UD; Buck AK; Mottok A; Ritter C; Schneider P; Metzen D; Heuschmann P; Malzahn U; Kübler AC; Herrmann K; Bluemel C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 44(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 25442744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of imaging methods for detection of bone tissue invasion in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Uribe S; Rojas LA; Rosas CF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(6):20120346. PubMed ID: 23420854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of multislice computerized tomography, cone-beam computerized tomography, and single photon emission computerized tomography for the assessment of bone invasion by oral malignancies.
Dreiseidler T; Alarabi N; Ritter L; Rothamel D; Scheer M; Zöller JE; Mischkowski RA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Sep; 112(3):367-74. PubMed ID: 21778080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Imaging of mandible invasion by oral squamous cell carcinoma using computed tomography, cone-beam computed tomography and bone scintigraphy with SPECT.
Hakim SG; Wieker H; Trenkle T; Sieg P; Konitzer J; Holl-Ulrich K; Jacobsen HC
Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Apr; 18(3):961-7. PubMed ID: 23873323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic yield of cone beam computed tomography for small foreign body detection in the hand in comparison with radiography, MSCT and MRI: an ex vivo study.
Jandl NM; Rolvien T; Rupp T; Schumacher U; Püschel K; Maas KJ; Amling M; Henes FO; Spink C
Injury; 2021 Oct; 52(10):2841-2847. PubMed ID: 33487409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of panoramic radiography in diagnosing maxillary sinus-root relationship: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sun W; Xia K; Tang L; Liu C; Zou L; Liu J
Angle Orthod; 2018 Nov; 88(6):819-829. PubMed ID: 30179053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The utility of cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography scan for the evaluation of invasion versus erosion by mandibular squamous cell carcinoma as viewed on medical PACS.
Neal TW; Wahidi J; Williams FC; Schlieve T; Donepudi J; Kim RY
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent); 2024; 37(3):396-400. PubMed ID: 38628331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does SPECT Provide Incremental Value to CT or MRI in Assessing Mandibular Invasion by Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma?
Buller J; Borggrefe J; Zirk M; Benzer E; Zöller JE; Dreiseidler T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 May; 78(5):835-843. PubMed ID: 32001199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam CT as ancillary tools to detect low bone mineral density in post-menopausal women.
Kato CN; Tavares NP; Barra SG; Amaral TM; Brasileiro CB; Abreu LG; Mesquita RA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20180254. PubMed ID: 30306800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography for the evaluation of mandible invasion by oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Wang Z; Zhang S; Pu Y; Wang Y; Lin Z; Wang Z
BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):226. PubMed ID: 33933043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and eight-slice computed tomography for evaluation of external root reabsorption].
Xie XY; Zhang ZY
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Aug; 44(4):628-32. PubMed ID: 22898861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between cone beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography in diagnostic accuracy of maxillofacial fractures in dried human skull: an in vitro study.
Eskandarlou A; Poorolajal J; Talaeipour AR; Talebi S; Talaeipour M
Dent Traumatol; 2014 Apr; 30(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 23826823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cone-beam CT in the assessment of mandibular invasion by oral squamous cell carcinoma: results of the preliminary study.
Hendrikx AW; Maal T; Dieleman F; Van Cann EM; Merkx MA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 39(5):436-9. PubMed ID: 20211543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finger fractures imaging: accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography.
Faccioli N; Foti G; Barillari M; Atzei A; Mucelli RP
Skeletal Radiol; 2010 Nov; 39(11):1087-95. PubMed ID: 20224906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Accuracy of Periapical Radiography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Identifying Root Canal Configuration of Human Premolars.
Sousa TO; Haiter-Neto F; Nascimento EHL; Peroni LV; Freitas DQ; Hassan B
J Endod; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1176-1179. PubMed ID: 28527842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography in detecting apical periodontitis using histopathological findings as a reference standard.
Kanagasingam S; Lim CX; Yong CP; Mannocci F; Patel S
Int Endod J; 2017 May; 50(5):417-426. PubMed ID: 27063209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone invasion in oral cancer patients: a comparison between Orthopantamograph, conventional computed tomography, and single positron emission computed tomography.
Kushraj T; Chatra L; Shenai P; Rao PK
J Cancer Res Ther; 2011; 7(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 22269406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
