These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31693317)

  • 21. WITHDRAWN: Intra-uterine versus cervical insemination of donor sperm for subfertility.
    O'Brien P; Vandekerckhove P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; (4):CD000317. PubMed ID: 17636628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intra-uterine versus cervical insemination of donor sperm for subfertility.
    O'Brien P; Vandekerckhove P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000317. PubMed ID: 10796709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The association between endometrial thickness and pregnancy outcome in gonadotropin-stimulated intrauterine insemination cycles.
    Liu Y; Ye XY; Chan C
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2019 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 30674305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Factors affecting live birth rate in intrauterine insemination cycles with recombinant gonadotrophin stimulation.
    Erdem A; Erdem M; Atmaca S; Korucuoglu U; Karabacak O
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Aug; 17(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 18681993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Direct intraperitoneal or intrauterine insemination and superovulation in infertility treatment: a randomized study.
    Hovatta O; Kurunmäki H; Tiitinen A; Lähteenmäki P; Koskimies AI
    Fertil Steril; 1990 Aug; 54(2):339-41. PubMed ID: 2379634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The cervical factor of infertility and intrauterine insemination.
    Glezerman M; Bernstein D; Insler V
    Int J Fertil; 1984; 29(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 6146578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of clinical efficacy of three different insemination techniques in couple infertility. A randomized study.
    Noci I; Dabizzi S; Evangelisti P; Cozzi C; Cameron Smith M; Criscuoli L; Fuzzi B; Branconi F
    Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Feb; 59(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 17353869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: a cohort study.
    Kop PA; van Wely M; Mol BW; de Melker AA; Janssens PM; Arends B; Curfs MH; Kortman M; Nap A; Rijnders E; Roovers JP; Ruis H; Simons AH; Repping S; van der Veen F; Mochtar MH
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Mar; 30(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 25637621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Single versus double intrauterine insemination in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples: a systematic review based on a Cochrane review.
    Cantineau AE; Heineman MJ; Cohlen BJ
    Hum Reprod; 2003 May; 18(5):941-6. PubMed ID: 12721166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intrauterine insemination.
    Sunde A; Kahn J; Molne K
    Hum Reprod; 1988 Jan; 3(1):97-9. PubMed ID: 3350943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Prognostic factors of pregnancy in intrauterine insemination].
    Barros Delgadillo JC; Rojas Ruiz JC; Molina Munguía AC; Villalobos Acosta S; Sánchez Solís V; Barroso Villa G; Gaviño Gaviño F
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2006 Dec; 74(12):611-25. PubMed ID: 17539317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Longer time interval between semen processing and intrauterine insemination does not affect pregnancy outcome.
    Jansen CHJR; Elisen MGLM; Leenstra CW; Kaaijk EM; van Stralen KJ; Verhoeve HR
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Nov; 108(5):764-769. PubMed ID: 28923283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Unexplained infertility and ovulatory induction with menopausal gonadotropins.
    Leanza V; Coco L; Grasso F; Leanza G; Zarbo G; Palumbo M
    Minerva Ginecol; 2014 Jun; 66(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 24971786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination: an actual therapy?].
    Almeida JP; Pinelo S; Serra H; Barbosa A; Felgueira E; Pires I; Tavares A
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2011 Nov; 33(11):341-7. PubMed ID: 22267112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the treatment of subfertility.
    Sikandar R; Virk S; Lakhani S; Sahab H; Rizvi J
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Dec; 15(12):782-5. PubMed ID: 16398971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of intrauterine insemination as first line treatment of subfertility.
    Zafar M; Jameel T; Abdullah KN
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2007 Mar; 57(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 17432018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predictors of intrauterine insemination success.
    Zainul MR; Ong FB; Omar MH; Ng SP; Nurshaireen A; Rahimah MD; Mariam S; Zolaidah M; Sharifah-Teh NS; Saniros A; Hasnita B
    Med J Malaysia; 2006 Dec; 61(5):599-607. PubMed ID: 17623962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of time intervals from the end of sperm collection to intrauterine insemination on the pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation-intrauterine insemination cycles.
    Kuru Pekcan M; Kokanalı D; Kokanalı K; Taşçı Y
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Dec; 47(10):561-564. PubMed ID: 30170131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Experience with intrauterine insemination].
    Sánchez MI; Cafatti C; Costoya A
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1990; 55(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 2284472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intrauterine insemination: is the timing correct?
    Kucuk T
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2008 Aug; 25(8):427-30. PubMed ID: 18763030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.