These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3169427)

  • 1. [The process of distinguishing the pitch of sounds and auditory evoked potentials].
    Karaichev KI; Samoĭlovich LA; Mikhalevskaia MB; Finkel' NV
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1988; 14(3):387-94. PubMed ID: 3169427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Measurement of the frequency-resolving power of hearing by evoked potentials].
    Supin AIa; Novikova LA; Rybalko NV
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1987; 13(4):588-93. PubMed ID: 3666362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The spectral characteristics of short-latency auditory evoked potentials].
    Khachunts AS; Vaganian LG; Bagdasarian RA; Tatevosian NE; Tatevosian IG; Kostanian EG; Bilian RN; Manasian KA
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2000; 26(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 10752302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Short-latency auditory evoked potentials during a change in the physical parameter of a sound stimulus].
    Khachunts AS; Vaganian LG; Bagdasarian RA; Tatevosian NE; Tatevosian IG; Kostanian EG; Manasian KA; Bilian RN
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2000; 26(3):48-53. PubMed ID: 10905033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mismatch negativity to frequency changes: no evidence from human event-related brain potentials for categorical speech processing of complex tones resembling vowel formant structure.
    Jacobsen T
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 May; 362(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 15158015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Latency variation of auditory N1m responses to vocal and nonvocal sounds.
    Mizuochi T; Yumoto M; Karino S; Itoh K; Yamasoba T
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1945-9. PubMed ID: 18007192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abnormal electrical brain responses to pitch in congenital amusia.
    Peretz I; Brattico E; Tervaniemi M
    Ann Neurol; 2005 Sep; 58(3):478-82. PubMed ID: 16130110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological evidence implicates automatic low-level feature detectors in perceptual asymmetry.
    Bishop DV; O'reilly J; McArthur GM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):177-9. PubMed ID: 15922169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Reflection of the effect of binaural release from masking in human long-latency auditory evoked potentials].
    Vaĭtulevich SF; Mal'tseva NF
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1987; 13(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 3582841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory brainstem responses to clicks in neonates.
    Durieux-Smith A; Edwards CG; Picton TW; McMurray B
    J Otolaryngol Suppl; 1985 Feb; 14():12-8. PubMed ID: 3864988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Extrapolation threshold audiometry using long-latency auditory evoked potentials].
    Grachev KV; Lopotko AI
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1995; 21(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 7698561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Reverse adaptation studied by recording short-latency auditory evoked potentials].
    Petrov SM; Pudov AI
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1998; 24(4):71-4. PubMed ID: 9778900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Human poststimulation hearing adaptation based on computerized audiometry data].
    Sagalovich BM; Melkumova GG
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1981; (2):15-20. PubMed ID: 7013240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancement of auditory-evoked potentials in musicians reflects an influence of expertise but not selective attention.
    Baumann S; Meyer M; Jäncke L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2238-49. PubMed ID: 18457513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Theta EEG oscillatory activity and auditory change detection.
    Fuentemilla L; Marco-Pallarés J; Münte TF; Grau C
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():93-101. PubMed ID: 18076870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Possibilities and importance of the clinical use of objective audiometry by auditory evoked potentials in children].
    Sapozhnikov IaM
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1987; (5):77-85. PubMed ID: 3321667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resolving precise temporal processing properties of the auditory system using continuous stimuli.
    Lalor EC; Power AJ; Reilly RB; Foxe JJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Jul; 102(1):349-59. PubMed ID: 19439675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variability of the early (0-10 MS) auditory evoked extracranial components.
    Spreng M
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1979 Mar; 11():79-89. PubMed ID: 299192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Brief acoustic stimuli for the recording of brain stem potentials by computer controlled system analysis].
    Kleberc G; Seifert K
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1983 Oct; 62(10):487-92. PubMed ID: 6645752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Normative data in clinical ABR.
    Bergholtz L
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1981; 13():75-81. PubMed ID: 6944782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.