263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31694538)
41. Ultraconserved elements are novel phylogenomic markers that resolve placental mammal phylogeny when combined with species-tree analysis.
McCormack JE; Faircloth BC; Crawford NG; Gowaty PA; Brumfield RT; Glenn TC
Genome Res; 2012 Apr; 22(4):746-54. PubMed ID: 22207614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Computational Performance and Statistical Accuracy of *BEAST and Comparisons with Other Methods.
Ogilvie HA; Heled J; Xie D; Drummond AJ
Syst Biol; 2016 May; 65(3):381-96. PubMed ID: 26821913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A time-calibrated, multi-locus phylogeny of piranhas and pacus (Characiformes: Serrasalmidae) and a comparison of species tree methods.
Thompson AW; Betancur-R R; López-Fernández H; Ortí G
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Dec; 81():242-57. PubMed ID: 25261120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The Past Sure is Tense: On Interpreting Phylogenetic Divergence Time Estimates.
Brown JW; Smith SA
Syst Biol; 2018 Mar; 67(2):340-353. PubMed ID: 28945912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Is it inappropriate to ask for your age? Evaluating parameter impact on tree dating in a challenging clade (Macroscelidea).
Hagemann J; Hofreiter M; Bibi F; Holroyd P; Arnold P
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2023 Jun; 183():107756. PubMed ID: 36906195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Sources of error inherent in species-tree estimation: impact of mutational and coalescent effects on accuracy and implications for choosing among different methods.
Huang H; He Q; Kubatko LS; Knowles LL
Syst Biol; 2010 Oct; 59(5):573-83. PubMed ID: 20833951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Methods for the quantitative comparison of molecular estimates of clade age and the fossil record.
Clarke JA; Boyd CA
Syst Biol; 2015 Jan; 64(1):25-41. PubMed ID: 25281846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The influence of gene flow on species tree estimation: a simulation study.
Leaché AD; Harris RB; Rannala B; Yang Z
Syst Biol; 2014 Jan; 63(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 23945075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Estimating divergence dates and evaluating dating methods using phylogenomic and mitochondrial data in squamate reptiles.
Mulcahy DG; Noonan BP; Moss T; Townsend TM; Reeder TW; Sites JW; Wiens JJ
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Dec; 65(3):974-91. PubMed ID: 22982760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Current Methods for Automated Filtering of Multiple Sequence Alignments Frequently Worsen Single-Gene Phylogenetic Inference.
Tan G; Muffato M; Ledergerber C; Herrero J; Goldman N; Gil M; Dessimoz C
Syst Biol; 2015 Sep; 64(5):778-91. PubMed ID: 26031838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Data-driven speciation tree prior for better species divergence times in calibration-poor molecular phylogenies.
Tao Q; Barba-Montoya J; Kumar S
Bioinformatics; 2021 Jul; 37(Suppl_1):i102-i110. PubMed ID: 34252953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Do Alignment and Trimming Methods Matter for Phylogenomic (UCE) Analyses?
Portik DM; Wiens JJ
Syst Biol; 2021 Apr; 70(3):440-462. PubMed ID: 32797207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Weighting by Gene Tree Uncertainty Improves Accuracy of Quartet-based Species Trees.
Zhang C; Mirarab S
Mol Biol Evol; 2022 Dec; 39(12):. PubMed ID: 36201617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference using Relaxed-clocks and the Multispecies Coalescent.
Flouri T; Huang J; Jiao X; Kapli P; Rannala B; Yang Z
Mol Biol Evol; 2022 Aug; 39(8):. PubMed ID: 35907248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Efficient Bayesian Species Tree Inference under the Multispecies Coalescent.
Rannala B; Yang Z
Syst Biol; 2017 Sep; 66(5):823-842. PubMed ID: 28053140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating species trees under the coalescent model.
Liu L; Yu L; Edwards SV
BMC Evol Biol; 2010 Oct; 10():302. PubMed ID: 20937096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Coalescent methods for estimating phylogenetic trees.
Liu L; Yu L; Kubatko L; Pearl DK; Edwards SV
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Oct; 53(1):320-8. PubMed ID: 19501178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The impact of the representation of fossil calibrations on Bayesian estimation of species divergence times.
Inoue J; Donoghue PC; Yang Z
Syst Biol; 2010 Jan; 59(1):74-89. PubMed ID: 20525621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A simulation study to examine the impact of recombination on phylogenomic inferences under the multispecies coalescent model.
Zhu T; Flouri T; Yang Z
Mol Ecol; 2022 May; 31(10):2814-2829. PubMed ID: 35313033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Calibrating divergence times on species trees versus gene trees: implications for speciation history of Aphelocoma jays.
McCormack JE; Heled J; Delaney KS; Peterson AT; Knowles LL
Evolution; 2011 Jan; 65(1):184-202. PubMed ID: 20681982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
