These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31695440)
1. Plastic binding feature of polymyxins: the effect on MIC susceptibility measurements. Sharafi T; Ardebili A Infect Drug Resist; 2019; 12():2649-2653. PubMed ID: 31695440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of disc diffusion, Etest and broth microdilution for testing susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa to polymyxins. van der Heijden IM; Levin AS; De Pedri EH; Fung L; Rossi F; Duboc G; Barone AA; Costa SF Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob; 2007 Aug; 6():8. PubMed ID: 17697363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contemporary assessment of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for polymyxin B and colistin: review of available interpretative criteria and quality control guidelines. Gales AC; Reis AO; Jones RN J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jan; 39(1):183-90. PubMed ID: 11136768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in potency and categorical agreement between colistin and polymyxin B when testing 15,377 clinical strains collected worldwide. Sader HS; Rhomberg PR; Farrell DJ; Jones RN Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2015 Dec; 83(4):379-81. PubMed ID: 26415906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Microplate Type and Broth Additives on Microdilution MIC Susceptibility Assays. Kavanagh A; Ramu S; Gong Y; Cooper MA; Blaskovich MAT Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2019 Jan; 63(1):. PubMed ID: 30397070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of disc diffusion, E-test, and broth microdilution methods for the determination of resistance to colistin, polymyxin B, and tigecycline in multi-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates]. Akin FE; Bayram A; Balci I Mikrobiyol Bul; 2010 Apr; 44(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 20549954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deciphering polymyxin B minimum inhibitory concentration from colistin minimum inhibitory concentration and vice versa: An analysis on 156 carbapenem-resistant Behera B; Jena J; Kar P; Mohanty S; Mahapatra A Indian J Med Microbiol; 2018; 36(4):587-589. PubMed ID: 30880712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Susceptibility testing of the polymyxins: where are we now? Humphries RM Pharmacotherapy; 2015 Jan; 35(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 25329490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Colistin and Polymyxin B Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations Determined by Etest Found Unreliable for Gram-Negative Bacilli. Simar S; Sibley D; Ashcraft D; Pankey G Ochsner J; 2017; 17(3):239-242. PubMed ID: 29026355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contemporary activity of colistin and polymyxin B against a worldwide collection of Gram-negative pathogens: results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2006-09). Gales AC; Jones RN; Sader HS J Antimicrob Chemother; 2011 Sep; 66(9):2070-4. PubMed ID: 21715434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhancing the antibacterial activity of polymyxins using a nonantibiotic drug. Krishnamurthy M; Lemmon MM; Falcinelli EM; Sandy RA; Dootz JN; Mott TM; Rajamani S; Schaecher KE; Duplantier AJ; Panchal RG Infect Drug Resist; 2019; 12():1393-1405. PubMed ID: 31239720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Pitfalls of polymyxin antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from cystic fibrosis patients. Hogardt M; Schmoldt S; Götzfried M; Adler K; Heesemann J J Antimicrob Chemother; 2004 Dec; 54(6):1057-61. PubMed ID: 15509615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inhibition of the ATP Synthase Eliminates the Intrinsic Resistance of Vestergaard M; Nøhr-Meldgaard K; Bojer MS; Krogsgård Nielsen C; Meyer RL; Slavetinsky C; Peschel A; Ingmer H mBio; 2017 Sep; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 28874470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Antimicrobial activity of the novel polymyxin derivative NAB739 tested against Gram-negative pathogens. Vaara M; Sader HS; Rhomberg PR; Jones RN; Vaara T J Antimicrob Chemother; 2013 Mar; 68(3):636-9. PubMed ID: 23134658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of a surfactant (polysorbate 80) to improve MIC susceptibility testing results for polymyxin B and colistin. Sader HS; Rhomberg PR; Flamm RK; Jones RN Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 Dec; 74(4):412-4. PubMed ID: 23102558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of the BD Phoenix100 System and Colistin Broth Disk Elution Method for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Colistin Against Gram-negative Bacteria]. Koyuncu Özyurt Ö; Özhak B; Öğünç D; Yıldız E; Çolak D; Günseren F; Öngüt G Mikrobiyol Bul; 2019 Jul; 53(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 31414627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Polymyxins: Challenges, Issues, and Recommendations. Ezadi F; Ardebili A; Mirnejad R J Clin Microbiol; 2019 Apr; 57(4):. PubMed ID: 30541939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Colistin and Polymyxin B Susceptibility Testing for Carbapenem-Resistant and Chew KL; La MV; Lin RTP; Teo JWP J Clin Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 55(9):2609-2616. PubMed ID: 28592552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Search for a Practical Method for Colistin Susceptibility Testing: Have We Found It by Going Back to the Future? Satlin MJ J Clin Microbiol; 2019 Feb; 57(2):. PubMed ID: 30463890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of antibacterial activities of polymyxin B and colistin against multidrug resistant Gram negative bacteria. Doymaz MZ; Karaaslan E Infect Dis (Lond); 2019 Sep; 51(9):676-682. PubMed ID: 31298061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]