These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31695870)

  • 1. Foraging ecology drives social information reliance in an avian eavesdropping community.
    Jones HH; Sieving KE
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Oct; 9(20):11584-11597. PubMed ID: 31695870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antipredator behaviors in urban settings: Ecological experimentation powered by citizen science.
    Zuckerberg B; McCabe JD; Gilbert NA
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Sep; 12(9):e9269. PubMed ID: 36177137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Personal information about danger trumps social information from avian alarm calls.
    McLachlan JR; Ratnayake CP; Magrath RD
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Mar; 286(1899):20182945. PubMed ID: 30900538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When the birds go unheard: highway noise disrupts information transfer between bird species.
    Grade AM; Sieving KE
    Biol Lett; 2016 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 27095267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anti-Predation Responses to Conspecific versus Heterospecific Alarm Calls by the Nestlings of Two Sympatric Birds.
    Jiang Y; Han J; Yang C
    Animals (Basel); 2022 Aug; 12(16):. PubMed ID: 36009746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: from mechanisms to consequences.
    Magrath RD; Haff TM; Fallow PM; Radford AN
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2015 May; 90(2):560-86. PubMed ID: 24917385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does similarity in call structure or foraging ecology explain interspecific information transfer in wild
    Hügel T; van Meir V; Muñoz-Meneses A; Clarin BM; Siemers BM; Goerlitz HR
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2017; 71(11):168. PubMed ID: 29200602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evolution of eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: Relevance, reliability, and personal information.
    Turner CR; Spike M; Magrath RD
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Jul; 13(7):e10272. PubMed ID: 37449019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What's the rumpus? Resident temperate forest birds approach an unfamiliar neotropical alarm call across three continents.
    Dominguez JS; Rakovic M; Li D; Pollock HS; Lawson S; Novcic I; Su X; Zeng Q; Al-Dhufari R; Johnson-Cadle S; Boldrick J; Chamberlain M; Hauber ME
    Biol Lett; 2023 Oct; 19(10):20230332. PubMed ID: 37788715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A micro-geography of fear: learning to eavesdrop on alarm calls of neighbouring heterospecifics.
    Magrath RD; Bennett TH
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Mar; 279(1730):902-9. PubMed ID: 21849313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anthropogenic noise alters dwarf mongoose responses to heterospecific alarm calls.
    Morris-Drake A; Bracken AM; Kern JM; Radford AN
    Environ Pollut; 2017 Apr; 223():476-483. PubMed ID: 28153414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eavesdropping grey squirrels infer safety from bird chatter.
    Lilly MV; Lucore EC; Tarvin KA
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221279. PubMed ID: 31483829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Free-range domestic chickens can distinguish between different alarm calls of Japanese tits.
    Liu J; Liang W
    Anim Cogn; 2023 Mar; 26(2):715-720. PubMed ID: 36209189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evolution of urgency-based and functionally referential alarm calls in ground-dwelling species.
    Furrer RD; Manser MB
    Am Nat; 2009 Mar; 173(3):400-10. PubMed ID: 19199527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor) calling and risk-sensitive foraging in the face of threat.
    Freeberg TM; Krama T; Vrublevska J; Krams I; Kullberg C
    Anim Cogn; 2014 Nov; 17(6):1341-52. PubMed ID: 24929843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Social dynamics of core members in mixed-species bird flocks change across a gradient of foraging habitat quality.
    Gentry Richardson KE; Roche DP; Mugel SG; Lancaster ND; Sieving KE; Freeberg TM; Lucas JR
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0262385. PubMed ID: 35108278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional traits determine heterospecific use of risk-related social information in forest birds of tropical South-East Asia.
    Hua F; Yong DL; Janra MN; Fitri LM; Prawiradilaga D; Sieving KE
    Ecol Evol; 2016 Dec; 6(23):8485-8494. PubMed ID: 28031800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interspecific signalling between mutualists: food-thieving drongos use a cooperative sentinel call to manipulate foraging partners.
    Baigrie BD; Thompson AM; Flower TP
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Sep; 281(1791):20141232. PubMed ID: 25080343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional Traits, Flocking Propensity, and Perceived Predation Risk in an Amazonian Understory Bird Community.
    Martínez AE; Gomez JP; Ponciano JM; Robinson SK
    Am Nat; 2016 May; 187(5):607-19. PubMed ID: 27104993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recognition of other species' aerial alarm calls: speaking the same language or learning another?
    Magrath RD; Pitcher BJ; Gardner JL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Feb; 276(1657):769-74. PubMed ID: 19004753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.