These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31697960)

  • 1. The influence of self-construals on the ERP response to the rewards for self and friend.
    Zhu X; Xu M; Wang H; Gu R; Jin Z
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jan; 147():1-8. PubMed ID: 31697960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of self-construals on the ERP response to the rewards for self and mother.
    Zhu X; Zhang H; Wu L; Yang S; Wu H; Luo W; Gu R; Luo YJ
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 18(2):366-374. PubMed ID: 29464554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of self-construal type on outcome evaluation: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Zhu X; Wu H; Yang S; Gu R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Feb; 112():64-69. PubMed ID: 28017638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When "Your" reward is the same as "My" reward: self-construal priming shifts neural responses to own vs. friends' rewards.
    Varnum ME; Shi Z; Chen A; Qiu J; Han S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():164-9. PubMed ID: 24185022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interpersonal relationship modulates brain responses to outcome evaluation when gambling for/against others: an electrophysiological analysis.
    Leng Y; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Oct; 63():205-14. PubMed ID: 25218954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-awareness buffers the consequences of negative feedback: Evidence from an ERP study.
    Xu M; Liu B; Gu R; Yang S; Wang H; Zhu X
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2021 Jun; 164():9-16. PubMed ID: 33556469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Altruistic traits are predicted by neural responses to monetary outcomes for self vs charity.
    San Martín R; Kwak Y; Pearson JM; Woldorff MG; Huettel SA
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 11(6):863-76. PubMed ID: 27030510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elevated outcome-anticipation and outcome-evaluation ERPs associated with a greater preference for larger-but-delayed rewards.
    Pornpattananangkul N; Nadig A; Heidinger S; Walden K; Nusslock R
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 17(3):625-641. PubMed ID: 28224457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-construal priming modulates pain perception: event-related potential evidence.
    Wang C; Ma Y; Han S
    Cogn Neurosci; 2014; 5(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 24168205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Self-reflection modulates the outcome evaluation process: Evidence from an ERP study.
    Zhu X; Gu R; Wu H; Luo Y
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Dec; 98(3 Pt 1):389-93. PubMed ID: 26255975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential effects of real versus hypothetical monetary reward magnitude on risk-taking behavior and brain activity.
    Xu S; Pan Y; Qu Z; Fang Z; Yang Z; Yang F; Wang F; Rao H
    Sci Rep; 2018 Feb; 8(1):3712. PubMed ID: 29487303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Willingness valued more than ability in partner choice: Insights into behavioral and ERP data.
    Xu Q; Wang J; Li P
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Jul; 61(7):e14558. PubMed ID: 38459648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reward and punishment hyposensitivity in problem gamblers: A study of event-related potentials using a principal components analysis.
    Lole L; Gonsalvez CJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul; 126(7):1295-309. PubMed ID: 25453608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subjective preferences differentially modulate the processing of rewards gained by own vs. observed choices.
    Peterburs J; Sannemann L; Bellebaum C
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Sep; 132():107139. PubMed ID: 31295450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How does cognitive reappraisal affect the response to gains and losses?
    Yang Q; Gu R; Tang P; Luo YJ
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Nov; 50(11):1094-103. PubMed ID: 23889144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Social power modulates individuals' neural responses to monetary and social rewards.
    He Y; Huang X; Zhang E
    Brain Cogn; 2024 Jun; 177():106167. PubMed ID: 38704903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Event-related components of the punishment and reward sensitivity.
    De Pascalis V; Varriale V; D'Antuono L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Jan; 121(1):60-76. PubMed ID: 19900840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An electrophysiological monetary incentive delay (e-MID) task: a way to decompose the different components of neural response to positive and negative monetary reinforcement.
    Broyd SJ; Richards HJ; Helps SK; Chronaki G; Bamford S; Sonuga-Barke EJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Jul; 209(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 22659003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cultural shaping of neural responses: Feedback-related potentials vary with self-construal and face priming.
    Hitokoto H; Glazer J; Kitayama S
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jan; 53(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 26681617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of reward magnitude on reward processing: An averaged and single trial event-related potential study.
    Meadows CC; Gable PA; Lohse KR; Miller MW
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Jul; 118():154-160. PubMed ID: 27288743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.