168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31698062)
1. Meta-analyses frequently pooled different study types together: a meta-epidemiological study.
Bun RS; Scheer J; Guillo S; Tubach F; Dechartres A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 118():18-28. PubMed ID: 31698062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-analyses of adverse effects data derived from randomised controlled trials as compared to observational studies: methodological overview.
Golder S; Loke YK; Bland M
PLoS Med; 2011 May; 8(5):e1001026. PubMed ID: 21559325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating agreement between bodies of evidence from randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in medical research: a meta-epidemiological study.
Bröckelmann N; Balduzzi S; Harms L; Beyerbach J; Petropoulou M; Kubiak C; Wolkewitz M; Meerpohl JJ; Schwingshackl L
BMC Med; 2022 May; 20(1):174. PubMed ID: 35538478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intervention effect estimates in randomised controlled trials conducted in primary care versus secondary or tertiary care settings: a meta-epidemiological study.
Dugard A; Tavernier E; Caille A; Dechartres A; Hoang A; Giraudeau B; Dibao-Dina C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):329. PubMed ID: 36550405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitivity subgroup analysis based on single-center vs. multi-center trial status when interpreting meta-analyses pooled estimates: the logical way forward.
Alexander PE; Bonner AJ; Agarwal A; Li SA; Hariharan A; Izhar Z; Bhatnagar N; Alba C; Akl EA; Fei Y; Guyatt GH; Beyene J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():80-92. PubMed ID: 26597972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Empirical evaluation of the methods used in systematic reviews including observational studies and randomized trials.
Cheurfa C; Tsokani S; Kontouli KM; Boutron I; Chaimani A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 158():44-52. PubMed ID: 36822441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. No consistent evidence of data availability bias existed in recent individual participant data meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study.
Tsujimoto Y; Fujii T; Onishi A; Omae K; Luo Y; Imai H; Takahashi S; Itaya T; Pinson C; Nevitt SJ; Furukawa TA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 118():107-114.e5. PubMed ID: 31654789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of treatment effect estimates for pharmacological randomized controlled trials enrolling older adults only and those including adults: a meta-epidemiological study.
Seegers V; Trinquart L; Boutron I; Ravaud P
PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e63677. PubMed ID: 23723992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma: a network meta-analysis.
Mhaskar R; Redzepovic J; Wheatley K; Clark OA; Miladinovic B; Glasmacher A; Kumar A; Djulbegovic B
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 May; (5):CD003188. PubMed ID: 22592688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Chinese herbal medicine for side effects of transarterial chemoembolization in liver cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis].
Li XQ; Ling CQ
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2012 Dec; 10(12):1341-62. PubMed ID: 23257126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discrepancies in meta-analyses answering the same clinical question were hard to explain: a meta-epidemiological study.
Hacke C; Nunan D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 119():47-56. PubMed ID: 31783099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic differences in effect estimates between observational studies and randomized control trials in meta-analyses in nephrology.
Kimachi M; Onishi A; Tajika A; Kimachi K; Furukawa TA
Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6088. PubMed ID: 33731727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of fibrin sealant during non-emergency surgery: a systematic review of evidence of benefits and harms.
Edwards SJ; Crawford F; van Velthoven MH; Berardi A; Osei-Assibey G; Bacelar M; Salih F; Wakefield V
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Dec; 20(94):1-224. PubMed ID: 28051764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of intervention effects in split-mouth and parallel-arm randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological study.
Smaïl-Faugeron V; Fron-Chabouis H; Courson F; Durieux P
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 May; 14():64. PubMed ID: 24886043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intervention effect estimates in cluster randomized versus individually randomized trials: a meta-epidemiological study.
Leyrat C; Caille A; Eldridge S; Kerry S; Dechartres A; Giraudeau B
Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 48(2):609-619. PubMed ID: 30418549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Disclosure of researcher allegiance in meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials of psychotherapy: a systematic appraisal.
Dragioti E; Dimoliatis I; Evangelou E
BMJ Open; 2015 Jun; 5(6):e007206. PubMed ID: 26033943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative effectiveness and safety of pharmaceuticals assessed in observational studies compared with randomized controlled trials.
Hong YD; Jansen JP; Guerino J; Berger ML; Crown W; Goettsch WG; Mullins CD; Willke RJ; Orsini LS
BMC Med; 2021 Dec; 19(1):307. PubMed ID: 34865623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
