These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31698062)

  • 21. Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analyses.
    Baudard M; Yavchitz A; Ravaud P; Perrodeau E; Boutron I
    BMJ; 2017 Feb; 356():j448. PubMed ID: 28213479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of All-Cause Mortality Following VTE Treatment Between Propensity Score-Adjusted Observational Studies and Matched Randomized Controlled Trials: Meta-Epidemiologic Study.
    Coscia C; Jaureguizar A; Quezada CA; Muriel A; Monreal M; Villén T; Barbero E; Chiluiza D; Yusen RD; Jimenez D
    Chest; 2019 Apr; 155(4):689-698. PubMed ID: 30961834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Heterogeneity in the definition of delirium in ICUs and association with the intervention effect in randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Collet L; Lanore A; Alaterre C; Constantin JM; Martin GL; Caille A; James A; Dechartres A
    Crit Care; 2023 May; 27(1):170. PubMed ID: 37143091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative rates of harms in randomized trials from more developed versus less developed countries may be different.
    Contopoulos-Ioannidis D; Tseretopoulou X; Ancker M; Walterspiel JN; Panagiotou OA; Maldonado Y; Ioannidis JP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 78():10-21. PubMed ID: 27063207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Observational studies using propensity score analysis underestimated the effect sizes in critical care medicine.
    Zhang Z; Ni H; Xu X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):932-9. PubMed ID: 24774469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Statins and risk of thromboembolism: A meta-regression to disentangle the efficacy-to-effectiveness gap using observational and trial evidence.
    Miksza JK; Zaccardi F; Kunutsor SK; Seidu S; Davies MJ; Khunti K
    Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis; 2019 Oct; 29(10):1023-1029. PubMed ID: 31383500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Rheumatoid arthritis patients treated in trial and real world settings: comparison of randomized trials with registries.
    Kilcher G; Hummel N; Didden EM; Egger M; Reichenbach S;
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2018 Feb; 57(2):354-369. PubMed ID: 29149289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative evidence on harms in pediatric randomized clinical trials from less developed versus more developed countries is limited.
    Tedesco D; Farid-Kapadia M; Offringa M; Bhutta ZA; Maldonado Y; Ioannidis JPA; Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():63-72. PubMed ID: 29191447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An Empirical Evaluation of the Impact Scenario of Pooling Bodies of Evidence from Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research.
    Schwingshackl L; Bröckelmann N; Beyerbach J; Werner SS; Zähringer J; Schwarzer G; Meerpohl JJ
    Adv Nutr; 2022 Oct; 13(5):1774-1786. PubMed ID: 35416239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Outcome of Medical and Psychosexual Interventions for Vaginismus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Maseroli E; Scavello I; Rastrelli G; Limoncin E; Cipriani S; Corona G; Fambrini M; Magini A; Jannini EA; Maggi M; Vignozzi L
    J Sex Med; 2018 Dec; 15(12):1752-1764. PubMed ID: 30446469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of nuisance parameters in pediatric versus adult randomized trials: a meta-epidemiologic empirical evaluation.
    Vandermeer B; van der Tweel I; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Weinreich SS; Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG; Bassler D; Fernandes RM; Askie L; Saloojee H; Baiardi P; Ellenberg SS; van der Lee JH
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jan; 18(1):7. PubMed ID: 29321002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Synthesis methods used to combine observational studies and randomised trials in published meta-analyses.
    Cheurfa C; Tsokani S; Kontouli KM; Boutron I; Chaimani A
    Syst Rev; 2024 Feb; 13(1):70. PubMed ID: 38383488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Per-Protocol analyses produced larger treatment effect sizes than intention to treat: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Mostazir M; Taylor G; Henley WE; Watkins ER; Taylor RS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():12-21. PubMed ID: 34161805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations.
    Mueller M; D'Addario M; Egger M; Cevallos M; Dekkers O; Mugglin C; Scott P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 29783954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs.
    Concato J; Shah N; Horwitz RI
    N Engl J Med; 2000 Jun; 342(25):1887-92. PubMed ID: 10861325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reporting of conflicts of interest in meta-analyses of trials of pharmacological treatments.
    Roseman M; Milette K; Bero LA; Coyne JC; Lexchin J; Turner EH; Thombs BD
    JAMA; 2011 Mar; 305(10):1008-17. PubMed ID: 21386079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Patients Aged 16 Years and Older: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Comparison of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies.
    Smeeing DPJ; van der Ven DJC; Hietbrink F; Timmers TK; van Heijl M; Kruyt MC; Groenwold RHH; van der Meijden OAJ; Houwert RM
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 Jul; 45(8):1937-1945. PubMed ID: 27864184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Radiotherapy effects on early breast cancer survival in observational and randomized studies: a systematic analysis of advantages, disadvantages and differences between the two study types.
    König J; van Ewijk R; Kuhr K; Schmidberger H; Wöckel A; Kreienberg R; Blettner M
    Breast Cancer; 2016 May; 23(3):415-24. PubMed ID: 25585654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews.
    Moher D; Pham B; Lawson ML; Klassen TP
    Health Technol Assess; 2003; 7(41):1-90. PubMed ID: 14670218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.