203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31699133)
21. The interdependence of mammary-specific super-enhancers and their native promoters facilitates gene activation during pregnancy.
Zeng X; Lee HK; Wang C; Achikeh P; Liu C; Hennighausen L
Exp Mol Med; 2020 Apr; 52(4):682-690. PubMed ID: 32321991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Improved regulatory element prediction based on tissue-specific local epigenomic signatures.
He Y; Gorkin DU; Dickel DE; Nery JR; Castanon RG; Lee AY; Shen Y; Visel A; Pennacchio LA; Ren B; Ecker JR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Feb; 114(9):E1633-E1640. PubMed ID: 28193886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Loci-specific histone acetylation profiles associated with transcriptional coactivator p300 during early myoblast differentiation.
Khilji S; Hamed M; Chen J; Li Q
Epigenetics; 2018; 13(6):642-654. PubMed ID: 29927685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Simultaneous Mapping of Enhancers and Enhancer Rearrangements with Paired-End H3K27ac ChIP-seq.
Antman I; Davis E; Abu-Kamel S; Hecht M; Drier Y
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2535():131-140. PubMed ID: 35867228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Epigenomic landscape of enhancer elements during Hydra head organizer formation.
Reddy PC; Gungi A; Ubhe S; Galande S
Epigenetics Chromatin; 2020 Oct; 13(1):43. PubMed ID: 33046126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Genome-wide enhancer prediction from epigenetic signatures using genetic algorithm-optimized support vector machines.
Fernández M; Miranda-Saavedra D
Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 May; 40(10):e77. PubMed ID: 22328731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Decoding regulatory structures and features from epigenomics profiles: A Roadmap-ENCODE Variational Auto-Encoder (RE-VAE) model.
Hu R; Pei G; Jia P; Zhao Z
Methods; 2021 May; 189():44-53. PubMed ID: 31672653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. InTAD: chromosome conformation guided analysis of enhancer target genes.
Okonechnikov K; Erkek S; Korbel JO; Pfister SM; Chavez L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):60. PubMed ID: 30704404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Multifaceted regulation of enhancers in cancer.
Xiao Q; Xiao Y; Li LY; Chen MK; Wu M
Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech; 2022 Aug; 1865(6):194839. PubMed ID: 35750313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Global Quantitative Mapping of Enhancers in Rice by STARR-seq.
Sun J; He N; Niu L; Huang Y; Shen W; Zhang Y; Li L; Hou C
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2019 Apr; 17(2):140-153. PubMed ID: 31201999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Inferring mammalian tissue-specific regulatory conservation by predicting tissue-specific differences in open chromatin.
Kaplow IM; Schäffer DE; Wirthlin ME; Lawler AJ; Brown AR; Kleyman M; Pfenning AR
BMC Genomics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):291. PubMed ID: 35410163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prediction of regulatory elements in mammalian genomes using chromatin signatures.
Won KJ; Chepelev I; Ren B; Wang W
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 9():547. PubMed ID: 19094206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. CENTRE: a gradient boosting algorithm for Cell-type-specific ENhancer-Target pREdiction.
Rapakoulia T; Lopez Ruiz De Vargas S; Omgba PA; Laupert V; Ulitsky I; Vingron M
Bioinformatics; 2023 Nov; 39(11):. PubMed ID: 37982748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Methods for ChIP-seq analysis: A practical workflow and advanced applications.
Nakato R; Sakata T
Methods; 2021 Mar; 187():44-53. PubMed ID: 32240773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. RFECS: a random-forest based algorithm for enhancer identification from chromatin state.
Rajagopal N; Xie W; Li Y; Wagner U; Wang W; Stamatoyannopoulos J; Ernst J; Kellis M; Ren B
PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(3):e1002968. PubMed ID: 23526891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comprehensive Survey of ChIP-Seq Datasets to Identify Candidate Iron Homeostasis Genes Regulated by Chromatin Modifications.
Yu Y; Wang Y; Yao Z; Wang Z; Xia Z; Lee J
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2665():95-111. PubMed ID: 37166596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A predictive modeling approach for cell line-specific long-range regulatory interactions.
Roy S; Siahpirani AF; Chasman D; Knaack S; Ay F; Stewart R; Wilson M; Sridharan R
Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Oct; 43(18):8694-712. PubMed ID: 26338778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Epigenomic profiling of primate lymphoblastoid cell lines reveals the evolutionary patterns of epigenetic activities in gene regulatory architectures.
García-Pérez R; Esteller-Cucala P; Mas G; Lobón I; Di Carlo V; Riera M; Kuhlwilm M; Navarro A; Blancher A; Di Croce L; Gómez-Skarmeta JL; Juan D; Marquès-Bonet T
Nat Commun; 2021 May; 12(1):3116. PubMed ID: 34035253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. ChIP-GSM: Inferring active transcription factor modules to predict functional regulatory elements.
Chen X; Neuwald AF; Hilakivi-Clarke L; Clarke R; Xuan J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jul; 17(7):e1009203. PubMed ID: 34292930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The genome-wide transcriptional regulatory landscape of ecdysone in the silkworm.
Cheng D; Cheng T; Yang X; Zhang Q; Fu J; Feng T; Gong J; Xia Q
Epigenetics Chromatin; 2018 Aug; 11(1):48. PubMed ID: 30149809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
