These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31699474)
1. Effect of Pressure Recovery on Pressure Gradients in Congenital Stenotic Outflow Lesions in Pediatric Patients-Clinical Implications of Lesion Severity and Geometry: A Simultaneous Doppler Echocardiography and Cardiac Catheter Correlative Study. Singh GK; Mowers KL; Marino C; Balzer D; Rao PS J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2020 Feb; 33(2):207-217. PubMed ID: 31699474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Instantaneous pressure gradient: a simultaneous Doppler and dual catheter correlative study. Currie PJ; Hagler DJ; Seward JB; Reeder GS; Fyfe DA; Bove AA; Tajik AJ J Am Coll Cardiol; 1986 Apr; 7(4):800-6. PubMed ID: 3958336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correction of Doppler Gradients for Pressure Recovery Improves Agreement with Subsequent Catheterization Gradients in Congenital Aortic Stenosis. Schlingmann TR; Gauvreau K; Colan SD; Powell AJ J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2015 Dec; 28(12):1410-7. PubMed ID: 26454341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of simultaneous invasive and noninvasive measurements of pressure gradients in congenital aortic valve stenosis. Barker PC; Ensing G; Ludomirsky A; Bradley DJ; Lloyd TR; Rocchini AP J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2002 Dec; 15(12):1496-502. PubMed ID: 12464918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "Overestimation" of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery. Baumgartner H; Stefenelli T; Niederberger J; Schima H; Maurer G J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 May; 33(6):1655-61. PubMed ID: 10334438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simultaneous Doppler/catheter measurements of pressure gradients in aortic valve disease: a correction to the Bernoulli equation based on velocity decay in the stenotic jet. VanAuker MD; Hla A; Meisner JS; Strom JA J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 10772051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pressure recovery in pediatric aortic valve stenosis. Villavicencio RE; Forbes TJ; Thomas RL; Humes RA Pediatr Cardiol; 2003; 24(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 14627313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of the Doppler-derived pressure gradient in pediatric patients with aortic valvular stenosis: is the correction for pressure recovery necessary? Yamazawa H Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 2010 Jul; 85(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 20718206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Insights into catheter/Doppler discrepancies in congenital aortic stenosis. Lemler MS; Valdes-Cruz LM; Shandas RS; Cape EG Am J Cardiol; 1999 May; 83(10):1447-50. PubMed ID: 10335760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How important is the impact of pressure recovery on routine evaluation of aortic stenosis? A clinical study in 91 patients. Isaaz K; Gaillard O; Cerisier A; Da Costa A; Faure E; Lamaud M; Gerenton C J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):347-56. PubMed ID: 15222280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Jet eccentricity: a misleading source of agreement between Doppler/catheter pressure gradients in aortic stenosis. VanAuker MD; Chandra M; Shirani J; Strom JA J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2001 Sep; 14(9):853-62. PubMed ID: 11547270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. Currie PJ; Seward JB; Reeder GS; Vlietstra RE; Bresnahan DR; Bresnahan JF; Smith HC; Hagler DJ; Tajik AJ Circulation; 1985 Jun; 71(6):1162-9. PubMed ID: 3995710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of aortic valve gradients by transseptal technique: implications for noninvasive evaluation. Gordon JB; Folland ED Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1989 Jul; 17(3):144-51. PubMed ID: 2766343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-invasive determination of the systolic peak-to-peak gradient in children with aortic stenosis: validation of a mathematical model. Lima VC; Zahn E; Houde C; Smallhorn J; Freedom RM; Benson LN Cardiol Young; 2000 Mar; 10(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 10817294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of aortic stenosis severity: role of contrast echocardiography in comparison with conventional echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. Almeida AG; Sargento L; Gabriel HM; da Costa JM; Morais J; Madeira F; David C; Oliveira J; da Cunha JC; Vagueiro MC Rev Port Cardiol; 2002 May; 21(5):555-72. PubMed ID: 12174519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methodologic issues in clinical evaluation of stenosis severity in adults undergoing aortic or mitral balloon valvuloplasty. The NHLBI Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry. Otto CM; Davis KB; Holmes DR; O'Neill W; Ferguson J; Bashore TM; Bonan R Am J Cardiol; 1992 Jun; 69(19):1607-16. PubMed ID: 1598878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of severity of aortic stenosis by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. Subramanyan R; Srinivasan M; Joy J; Tharakan J; Titus T; Venkitachalam CG; Balakrishnan KG Indian Heart J; 1990; 42(5):371-4. PubMed ID: 2086443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of stenosis geometry on the Doppler-catheter gradient relation in vitro: a manifestation of pressure recovery. Baumgartner H; Schima H; Tulzer G; Kühn P J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 21(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 8450150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new approach for the evaluation of the severity of coarctation of the aorta using Doppler velocity index and effective orifice area: in vitro validation and clinical implications. Keshavarz-Motamed Z; Garcia J; Maftoon N; Bedard E; Chetaille P; Kadem L J Biomech; 2012 Apr; 45(7):1239-45. PubMed ID: 22342139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]