These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

494 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31699537)

  • 1. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
    Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
    J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
    Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Impact of Circular Stapler Size on the Incidence of Cervical Anastomotic Stricture After Esophagectomy.
    Hosoi T; Abe T; Uemura N; Higaki E; Kawai R; Kawakami J; An B; Nagino M; Shimizu Y
    World J Surg; 2019 Jul; 43(7):1746-1755. PubMed ID: 30847524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Application of gastroepiploic tunnel esophagogastrostomy in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
    Zhou L; Ge P; Chen J; Wang J; Wang M; Li X; Jiang T
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):1021-1024. PubMed ID: 27680071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study.
    Xu QR; Wang KN; Wang WP; Zhang K; Chen LQ
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2011 Jun; 15(6):915-21. PubMed ID: 21484495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
    Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Which Anastomotic Techniques Is the Best Choice for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.
    Chen B; Xia P; Tang W; Huang S
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Feb; 27(2):422-432. PubMed ID: 36417036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of greater curvature and lesser curvature circular-stapled esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Sasaki K; Omoto I; Uchikado Y; Okumura H; Noda M; Tsuruda Y; Kita Y; Arigami T; Mori S; Kurahara H; Nakajyo A; Koriyama C; Natsugoe S; Ohtsuka T
    Surg Today; 2021 Apr; 51(4):575-581. PubMed ID: 32974752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Totally Mechanical Collard Technique for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Stricture Formation Compared with Circular Stapled Anastomosis.
    Hirano Y; Fujita T; Sato K; Kurita D; Sato T; Ishiyama K; Fujiwara H; Oguma J; Daiko H
    World J Surg; 2020 Dec; 44(12):4175-4183. PubMed ID: 32783124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Totally mechanical Collard versus circular stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Liu H; Shan L; Wang J; Zhai R; Zhu Y; Yao F
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):891-901. PubMed ID: 36038647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of cervical end-to-side triangulating esophagogastric anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Nakata K; Nagai E; Ohuchida K; Nakamura K; Tanaka M
    World J Surg; 2015 May; 39(5):1099-104. PubMed ID: 25582767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel technique for cervical gastro-oesophageal anastomosis during minimally invasive oesophagectomy.
    Wang ZQ; Jiang YQ; Xu W; Cai HR; Zhang Z; Yin Z; Zhang Q
    Int J Surg; 2018 May; 53():221-229. PubMed ID: 29609046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Tsuji T; Ojima T; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Katsuda M; Hayata K; Kitadani J; Maruoka S; Shimokawa T; Yamaue H
    Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 30691515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Embedded Three-Layer Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Morbidity and Improves Short-Term Outcomes After Esophagectomy for Cancer.
    Sun HB; Li Y; Liu XB; Zhang RX; Wang ZF; Zheng Y; Qin JJ; Li HM; Chen XK; Wu Z
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1131-8. PubMed ID: 26687140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benign anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy: risk factors and management.
    Honkoop P; Siersema PD; Tilanus HW; Stassen LP; Hop WC; van Blankenstein M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jun; 111(6):1141-6; discussion 1147-8. PubMed ID: 8642814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Outcomes with Semi-mechanical and Circular Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis following Esophagectomy.
    Yanni F; Singh P; Tewari N; Parsons SL; Catton JA; Duffy J; Welch NT; Vohra RS
    World J Surg; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2483-2489. PubMed ID: 31222637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
    Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Circular stapling anastomosis with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Shishido Y; Matsunaga T; Makinoya M; Miyauchi W; Shimizu S; Miyatani K; Uejima C; Morimoto M; Murakami Y; Hanaki T; Kihara K; Yamamoto M; Tokuyasu N; Takano S; Sakamoto T; Saito H; Hasegawa T; Fujiwara Y
    BMC Surg; 2022 Apr; 22(1):152. PubMed ID: 35488244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of hand-sewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomoses in the neck after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Ozawa H; Kawakubo H; Nishimura E; Matsuda S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36222073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Real-life introduction of powered circular stapler for esophagogastric anastomosis: cohort and propensity matched score study.
    Vanstraelen S; Coosemans W; Depypere L; Mandeville Y; Moons J; Van Veer H; Nafteux P
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Apr; 36(5):. PubMed ID: 36222069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.