These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31699969)

  • 1. Translating clinical findings to the legal norm: the Defendant's Insanity Assessment Support Scale (DIASS).
    Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Meynen G; Carabellese F; Ferracuti S
    Transl Psychiatry; 2019 Nov; 9(1):278. PubMed ID: 31699969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of a new instrument to guide and support insanity evaluations: the defendant's insanity assessment support scale (DIASS).
    Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Roma P; Ferracuti S
    Transl Psychiatry; 2022 Mar; 12(1):115. PubMed ID: 35318308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Technology to Improve the Objectivity of Criminal Responsibility Evaluations.
    Vitacco MJ; Gottfried ED; Batastini AB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 29618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A confusion of tongues: competence, insanity, psychiatry, and the law.
    Gutheil TG
    Psychiatr Serv; 1999 Jun; 50(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 10375145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Competency to stand trial and defendants who lack insight into their mental illness.
    Reisner AD; Piel J; Makey M
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 23503181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neuroscience-based Psychiatric Assessments of Criminal Responsibility: Beyond Self-Report?
    Meynen G
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2020 Jul; 29(3):446-458. PubMed ID: 32484135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hendricks v. People: forcing the insanity defense on an unwilling defendant.
    Miller RD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2):295-7. PubMed ID: 12108569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mental Condition Requirement in Competency to Stand Trial Assessments.
    Reisner AD; Piel JL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 29618540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
    Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Defendant's or convict's competency to stand trial - forensic psychiatric evaluation.
    Cynkier PN
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2017; 67(3):214-225. PubMed ID: 29460611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Mental state and the criminal responsibility--legal regulations and medical criteria in Poland and other countries].
    Bolechała F
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2009; 59(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 20860304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychiatry and the death penalty.
    Scott CL
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2006 Sep; 29(3):791-804. PubMed ID: 16904512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mental disorder and legal responsibility: the relevance of stages of decision making.
    Kalis A; Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(6):601-8. PubMed ID: 24694295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forensic psychiatric expert witnessing within the criminal justice system in Germany.
    Konrad N; Völlm B
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24268458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unfitness to plead in England and Wales: Historical development and contemporary dilemmas.
    Brown P
    Med Sci Law; 2019 Jul; 59(3):187-196. PubMed ID: 31204577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Residential mental health assessment within Dutch criminal cases: a discussion.
    van der Leij JB; Jackson JL; Malsch M; Nijboer JF
    Behav Sci Law; 2001; 19(5-6):691-702. PubMed ID: 11787076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Progress in standard assessment on competency to stand trial of mentally disordered offenders].
    Chen XB; Cai WX
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 28(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 23033670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Free will, neuroscience, and choice: towards a decisional capacity model for insanity defense evaluations.
    Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Meynen G; Tarsitani L; Biondi M; Ferracuti S
    Riv Psichiatr; 2017; 52(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 28287192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial.
    Mossman D; Noffsinger SG; Ash P; Frierson RL; Gerbasi J; Hackett M; Lewis CF; Pinals DA; Scott CL; Sieg KG; Wall BW; Zonana HV;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4 Suppl):S3-72. PubMed ID: 18083992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mentally disordered offenders and the law: Research update on the insanity defense, 2004-2019.
    Adjorlolo S; Chan HCO; DeLisi M
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 67():101507. PubMed ID: 31785724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.