BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31699969)

  • 1. Translating clinical findings to the legal norm: the Defendant's Insanity Assessment Support Scale (DIASS).
    Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Meynen G; Carabellese F; Ferracuti S
    Transl Psychiatry; 2019 Nov; 9(1):278. PubMed ID: 31699969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of a new instrument to guide and support insanity evaluations: the defendant's insanity assessment support scale (DIASS).
    Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Roma P; Ferracuti S
    Transl Psychiatry; 2022 Mar; 12(1):115. PubMed ID: 35318308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Technology to Improve the Objectivity of Criminal Responsibility Evaluations.
    Vitacco MJ; Gottfried ED; Batastini AB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 29618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A confusion of tongues: competence, insanity, psychiatry, and the law.
    Gutheil TG
    Psychiatr Serv; 1999 Jun; 50(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 10375145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Competency to stand trial and defendants who lack insight into their mental illness.
    Reisner AD; Piel J; Makey M
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 23503181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neuroscience-based Psychiatric Assessments of Criminal Responsibility: Beyond Self-Report?
    Meynen G
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2020 Jul; 29(3):446-458. PubMed ID: 32484135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hendricks v. People: forcing the insanity defense on an unwilling defendant.
    Miller RD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2):295-7. PubMed ID: 12108569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mental Condition Requirement in Competency to Stand Trial Assessments.
    Reisner AD; Piel JL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 29618540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
    Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Defendant's or convict's competency to stand trial - forensic psychiatric evaluation.
    Cynkier PN
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2017; 67(3):214-225. PubMed ID: 29460611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Mental state and the criminal responsibility--legal regulations and medical criteria in Poland and other countries].
    Bolechała F
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2009; 59(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 20860304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychiatry and the death penalty.
    Scott CL
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2006 Sep; 29(3):791-804. PubMed ID: 16904512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mental disorder and legal responsibility: the relevance of stages of decision making.
    Kalis A; Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(6):601-8. PubMed ID: 24694295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forensic psychiatric expert witnessing within the criminal justice system in Germany.
    Konrad N; Völlm B
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24268458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unfitness to plead in England and Wales: Historical development and contemporary dilemmas.
    Brown P
    Med Sci Law; 2019 Jul; 59(3):187-196. PubMed ID: 31204577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Residential mental health assessment within Dutch criminal cases: a discussion.
    van der Leij JB; Jackson JL; Malsch M; Nijboer JF
    Behav Sci Law; 2001; 19(5-6):691-702. PubMed ID: 11787076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Progress in standard assessment on competency to stand trial of mentally disordered offenders].
    Chen XB; Cai WX
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 28(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 23033670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Free will, neuroscience, and choice: towards a decisional capacity model for insanity defense evaluations.
    Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Meynen G; Tarsitani L; Biondi M; Ferracuti S
    Riv Psichiatr; 2017; 52(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 28287192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial.
    Mossman D; Noffsinger SG; Ash P; Frierson RL; Gerbasi J; Hackett M; Lewis CF; Pinals DA; Scott CL; Sieg KG; Wall BW; Zonana HV;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4 Suppl):S3-72. PubMed ID: 18083992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mentally disordered offenders and the law: Research update on the insanity defense, 2004-2019.
    Adjorlolo S; Chan HCO; DeLisi M
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 67():101507. PubMed ID: 31785724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.