BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31701157)

  • 1. Esophageal Position Affects Short-Term Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.
    Uchihara T; Yoshida N; Baba Y; Nakashima Y; Kimura Y; Saeki H; Takeno S; Sadanaga N; Ikebe M; Morita M; Toh Y; Nanashima A; Maehara Y; Baba H
    World J Surg; 2020 Mar; 44(3):831-837. PubMed ID: 31701157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer?
    Li J; Shen Y; Tan L; Feng M; Wang H; Xi Y; Wang Q
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Apr; 29(4):925-30. PubMed ID: 25249141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
    Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A retrospective study of preoperative malnutrition based on the Controlling Nutritional Status score as an associated marker for short-term outcomes after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Horinouchi T; Yoshida N; Harada K; Eto K; Sawayama H; Iwatsuki M; Iwagami S; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Baba H
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3367-3375. PubMed ID: 35976434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma reduces postoperative pain and pneumonia compared to hybrid esophagectomy.
    Berlth F; Plum PS; Chon SH; Gutschow CA; Bollschweiler E; Hölscher AH
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Dec; 32(12):4957-4965. PubMed ID: 29931451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utility of thoracic cage width in assessing surgical difficulty of minimally invasive esophagectomy in left lateral decubitus position.
    Takeno S; Tanoue Y; Hamada R; Kawano F; Tashiro K; Wada T; Ikenoue M; Nanashima A; Nakamura K
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3479-3486. PubMed ID: 31576442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Salvage minimally invasive esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer can improve postoperative complications compared with salvage open esophagectomy.
    Ishiyama K; Oguma J; Kubo K; Kanematsu K; Kurita D; Daiko H
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3504-3510. PubMed ID: 34642795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between the severity of emphysematous change in the lung and morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A retrospective study on a novel strategy for risk prediction.
    Horinouchi T; Yoshida N; Shiraishi S; Hara Y; Matsumoto C; Toihata T; Kosumi K; Harada K; Eto K; Ogawa K; Sawayama H; Iwatsuki M; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Baba H
    Thorac Cancer; 2024 Jan; 15(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 38069606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors influencing difficulty of the thoracic procedure in minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Okamura A; Watanabe M; Mine S; Nishida K; Imamura Y; Kurogochi T; Kitagawa Y; Sano T
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4279-85. PubMed ID: 26743111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.
    Kubo N; Ohira M; Yamashita Y; Sakurai K; Toyokawa T; Tanaka H; Muguruma K; Shibutani M; Yamazoe S; Kimura K; Nagahara H; Amano R; Ohtani H; Yashiro M; Maeda K; Hirakawa K
    Anticancer Res; 2014 May; 34(5):2399-404. PubMed ID: 24778050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review.
    Koyanagi K; Ozawa S; Tachimori Y
    Surg Today; 2016 Mar; 46(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 25860592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Short-term Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
    Nomoto D; Yoshida N; Akiyama T; Kiyozumi Y; Eto K; Hiyoshi Y; Nagai Y; Iwatsuki M; Iwagami S; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Baba H
    Anticancer Res; 2019 Jan; 39(1):471-475. PubMed ID: 30591497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of intraoperative fluid management on postoperative complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center study.
    Takahashi M; Toyama H; Takahashi K; Kaiho Y; Ejima Y; Yamauchi M
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2024 Jan; 24(1):29. PubMed ID: 38238681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes of robotic versus non-robotic minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: An American College of Surgeons NSQIP database analysis.
    Harbison GJ; Vossler JD; Yim NH; Murayama KM
    Am J Surg; 2019 Dec; 218(6):1223-1228. PubMed ID: 31500797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive esophagectomy may contribute to long-term respiratory function after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Kosumi K; Yoshida N; Okadome K; Eto T; Kuroda D; Ohuchi M; Kiyozumi Y; Nakamura K; Izumi D; Tokunaga R; Harada K; Mima K; Sawayama H; Ishimoto T; Iwatsuki M; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Watanabe M; Baba H
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Jun; 31(6):. PubMed ID: 29444214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transthoracic approach is associated with increased incidence of atrial fibrillation after esophageal resection.
    Lohani KR; Nandipati KC; Rollins SE; Fetten K; Lee TH; Pallati PK; Yamamoto SR; Mittal SK
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Jul; 29(7):2039-45. PubMed ID: 25361647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.