These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3170180)
1. Observation: a useful tool or a relic from the past? Pearson JW Hawaii Med J; 1988 Aug; 47(8):369-71, 389. PubMed ID: 3170180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Restrict subspecialists to their own field or risk quality problems. Hosp Peer Rev; 2002 May; 27(5):61-3. PubMed ID: 12001559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of medical staff departments in peer review. Dimond FC QRC Advis; 1992 Jun; 8(8):6-8. PubMed ID: 10119299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How good are the specialists you refer to? Terry K Med Econ; 2001 Jun; 78(12):60, 63, 67-8, passim. PubMed ID: 11471419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Lung cancer peer review survey. Beckett PA Thorax; 2008 Mar; 63(3):290-1. PubMed ID: 18308968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. What the crackdown on hospital privileges means to you. Horsley JE Med Econ; 1979 Aug; 56(17):93, 96-8. PubMed ID: 10243250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Grayzoning: does it protect patients--or bad doctors? Holoweiko M Med Econ; 1979 Feb; 56(4):186-8, 190, 193-4 passim. PubMed ID: 10247317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploding 12 myths about quality assurance and peer review. Thompson RE Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):39-49. PubMed ID: 10290183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986--what it means to the physician. Curtis T Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):19-23. PubMed ID: 10284643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using a competence framework to select future medical specialists. Heard S; Appleyard J; Aitken M; Paice E Hosp Med; 2002 Jun; 63(6):361-7. PubMed ID: 12096667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The original hospitalists. Critical-care specialists' training for inpatient care far exceeds that of internists. Gipe B Mod Healthc; 1997 Apr; 27(17):25. PubMed ID: 10166730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Who to call when the doctor is sick. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Dec; 8(6):18-20. PubMed ID: 721299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. How to obtain the data for medical staff standards. Hosp Peer Rev; 2007 Aug; 32(8):109-11. PubMed ID: 17763626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Protection of quality assurance and peer review data. Stevens M Health Law Can; 1989; 9(3):79-82. PubMed ID: 10313023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The competence movement: a report on the activities of the American Board of Medical Specialties. Nahrwold DL Bull Am Coll Surg; 2000 Nov; 85(11):14-8. PubMed ID: 11357773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical staff: what should trigger a focused review? Hosp Peer Rev; 2007 Oct; 32(10):137-8, 143. PubMed ID: 17957881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical record review for clinical pertinence. Lewis KS Top Health Rec Manage; 1991 Aug; 12(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10112162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hospital accountability in health care delivery. Belmont CE Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1983 Dec; 5(10):7-39. PubMed ID: 10273432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]