These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3170275)

  • 1. [Unilateral transitory autophony caused by opening the eustachian tube].
    Berendes J
    HNO; 1988 May; 36(5):212-3. PubMed ID: 3170275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effect of ipsilateral competitive message on the identification of synthetic phrases in selective noise damage (3-4 KHz)].
    Mallardi V; Aste C; Puxeddu P
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1987; 7(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 3661170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity of hearing to low-frequency amplitude modulation in normal and deaf children.
    Chernigovskaya TV
    Hum Physiol; 1979; 4(2):236-9. PubMed ID: 447345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neurophysiological mechanisms of perception of verbal stimuli by children with hearing disturbances.
    Belov IM; Zaitseva LM; Khrizman TP; Lomovatskaya LG
    Hum Physiol; 1978; 4(6):806-14. PubMed ID: 757564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. BAHA in children and adolescents with unilateral or bilateral conductive hearing loss: a study of outcome.
    Priwin C; Jönsson R; Hultcrantz M; Granström G
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jan; 71(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 17092570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech intelligibility in noise with ear protectors.
    Abel SM; Alberti PW; Riko K
    J Otolaryngol; 1980 Jun; 9(3):256-65. PubMed ID: 7001041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physiological and acoustic aspects of improvement of speech reception in nerve and conduction deafness.
    Moroz BS
    Hum Physiol; 1985; 11(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 4086032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Physiology and pathophysiology of the ventilation of the middle ear. 2. Methods of examination of the eustachian tube. Pathophysiology of typical ventilation disorders of the middle ear].
    Feldmann H
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1973 Aug; 52(8):555-72. PubMed ID: 4582419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of the level of hearing loss based on the results of tympanometry in children under 5 years of age with eustachian tube dysfunction].
    Sente M; Sente R
    Med Pregl; 2000; 53(11-12):559-63. PubMed ID: 11320740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Prevention of unilateral hearing loss].
    Radü HJ; Kurlemann G
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1989 Feb; 68(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 2706068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Central effects of residual hearing: implications for choice of ear for cochlear implantation.
    Francis HW; Yeagle JD; Brightwell T; Venick H
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Oct; 114(10):1747-52. PubMed ID: 15454765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Progressive hearing loss after single exposure to acute acoustic trauma.
    Kellerhals B
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1991; 248(5):289-92. PubMed ID: 1888508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The meaning of modern audiological tests in relation to noise-induced deafness: a review.
    Wilmot TJ
    Br J Ind Med; 1972 Apr; 29(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 4553812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Conductive hearing loss caused by eustachian tube dysfunction according to the data of functional computed tomography].
    Bodrova IV; Dobrotin VE; Kulakova LA; Fominykh EV; Pokoziĭ IIu; Lopatin AS
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2012; (1):4-8. PubMed ID: 22679807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does the Silastic Eustachian Tube prosthesis improve eustachian tube function?
    Lesinski SG; Fox JM; Seid AB; Bratcher GO; Cotton R
    Laryngoscope; 1980 Sep; 90(9):1413-28. PubMed ID: 7190631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Dysfunction of the eustachian tube and endothelial dysfunction: the current view of the problem (part 2)].
    Petukhova NA
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2012; (6):103-8. PubMed ID: 23268260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binaural pitch perception in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Santurette S; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):29-47. PubMed ID: 17107767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of noise-induced hearing loss on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
    Smoorenburg GF; de Laat JA; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 16():123-33. PubMed ID: 6962506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Information capacity of the ear during its exposure to an elevated sound level].
    Pialoux P; Pimonow L; Lucas A
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1971; 25(1):233-6. PubMed ID: 5120990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.