These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3170279)

  • 1. [Perception of acoustic speech features with single channel cochlear implants and hearing aids. A comparative analysis].
    Dillier N; Spillmann T
    HNO; 1988 Aug; 36(8):335-41. PubMed ID: 3170279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech perception abilities of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids.
    Osberger MJ; Robbins AM; Miyamoto RT; Berry SW; Myres WA; Kessler KS; Pope ML
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():105-15. PubMed ID: 2069171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Aspects of auditory speech perception in cochlear implant and hearing aid managed children].
    Junge FM; Dahm MC; Braun O
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(10):255-8. PubMed ID: 9324868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vowel perception: experiments with a single-electrode cochlear implant.
    Doyle KJ; Danhauer JL; Edgerton BJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 3755193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic characteristics of the speech of young cochlear implant users: a comparison with normal-hearing age-mates.
    Uchanski RM; Geers AE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):90S-105S. PubMed ID: 12612484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Speech perception test in Italian language for profoundly deaf children].
    Genovese E; Orzan E; Turrini M; Babighian G; Arslan E
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1995 Oct; 15(5):383-90. PubMed ID: 8721729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech perception abilities in children with cochlear implants or hearing aids.
    Somers MN
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():174-8. PubMed ID: 2069178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of benefit from vibrotactile aid and cochlear implant for postlinguistically deaf adults.
    Skinner MW; Binzer SM; Fredrickson JM; Smith PG; Holden TA; Holden LK; Juelich MF; Turner BA
    Laryngoscope; 1988 Oct; 98(10):1092-9. PubMed ID: 3172956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigations on the tonotopy for patients with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
    Niewiarowicz M; Stieler O
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2005; 126(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 16180345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Audiological results with the cochlear implant.
    Thielemeir MA; Brimacombe JA; Eisenberg LS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):27-34. PubMed ID: 6805394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Noise signal reduction in cochlear implant speech processors].
    Müller-Deile J
    HNO; 1995 Sep; 43(9):545-51. PubMed ID: 7591867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Taking advantage of residual hearing by a hearing aid or a cochlear implant: a comparative study using the MAC (Minimal Auditory Capabilities) battery of tests].
    Spillmann T; Dillier N
    Ther Umsch; 1987 Feb; 44(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 3576499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech perception results for children with implants with different levels of preoperative residual hearing.
    Cowan RS; DelDot J; Barker EJ; Sarant JZ; Pegg P; Dettman S; Galvin KL; Rance G; Hollow R; Dowell RC; Pyman B; Gibson WP; Clark GM
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S125-6. PubMed ID: 9391629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensory aids in conjunction with cochlear implants.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Shapiro WH
    Am J Otol; 1992 Jul; 13(4):308-12. PubMed ID: 1415491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.