These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31704676)

  • 1. The Future of Environmental DNA in Forensic Science.
    Allwood JS; Fierer N; Dunn RR
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2020 Jan; 86(2):. PubMed ID: 31704676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Massively parallel sequencing is unlocking the potential of environmental trace evidence.
    Young JM; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jan; 50():102393. PubMed ID: 33157385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of standardized bioinformatics for the analysis of fungal DNA signatures applied to sample provenance.
    Allwood JS; Fierer N; Dunn RR; Breen M; Reich BJ; Laber EB; Clifton J; Grantham NS; Faith SA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 May; 310():110250. PubMed ID: 32240935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Review and future prospects for DNA barcoding methods in forensic palynology.
    Bell KL; Burgess KS; Okamoto KC; Aranda R; Brosi BJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():110-6. PubMed ID: 26751251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A semi-automated protocol for NGS metabarcoding and fungal analysis in forensic.
    Giampaoli S; De Vittori E; Frajese GV; Paytuví A; Sanseverino W; Anselmo A; Barni F; Berti A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jan; 306():110052. PubMed ID: 31778923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The utility of dust for forensic intelligence: Exploring collection methods and detection limits for environmental DNA, elemental and mineralogical analyses of dust samples.
    Foster NR; Martin B; Hoogewerff J; Aberle MG; de Caritat P; Roffey P; Edwards R; Malik A; Thwaites P; Waycott M; Young J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Mar; 344():111599. PubMed ID: 36801501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Soil DNA metabarcoding and high-throughput sequencing as a forensic tool: considerations, potential limitations and recommendations.
    Young JM; Austin JJ; Weyrich LS
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2017 Feb; 93(2):. PubMed ID: 27979996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental DNA assessment of airborne plant and fungal seasonal diversity.
    Banchi E; Ametrano CG; Tordoni E; Stanković D; Ongaro S; Tretiach M; Pallavicini A; Muggia L;
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Oct; 738():140249. PubMed ID: 32806340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Challenges in Human Skin Microbial Profiling for Forensic Science: A Review.
    Neckovic A; A H van Oorschot R; Szkuta B; Durdle A
    Genes (Basel); 2020 Aug; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 32872386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Soil metabarcoding identifies season indicators and differentiators of pig and Agrostis/Festuca spp. decomposition.
    Olakanye AO; Ralebitso-Senior TK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():53-58. PubMed ID: 29723738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing three soil removal methods for environmental DNA analysis of mock forensic geology evidence.
    Tiedge TM; Meiklejohn KA
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):52-59. PubMed ID: 37839019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fungal DNA barcoding.
    Xu J
    Genome; 2016 Nov; 59(11):913-932. PubMed ID: 27829306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities.
    Deiner K; Bik HM; Mächler E; Seymour M; Lacoursière-Roussel A; Altermatt F; Creer S; Bista I; Lodge DM; de Vere N; Pfrender ME; Bernatchez L
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Nov; 26(21):5872-5895. PubMed ID: 28921802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The environmental biological signature: NGS profiling for forensic comparison of soils.
    Giampaoli S; Berti A; Di Maggio RM; Pilli E; Valentini A; Valeriani F; Gianfranceschi G; Barni F; Ripani L; Romano Spica V
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jul; 240():41-7. PubMed ID: 24807707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA.
    McClenaghan B; Compson ZG; Hajibabaei M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0224119. PubMed ID: 32191699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emerging use of air eDNA and its application to forensic investigations - A review.
    Goray M; Taylor D; Bibbo E; Fantinato C; Fonneløp AE; Gill P; van Oorschot RAH
    Electrophoresis; 2024 May; 45(9-10):916-932. PubMed ID: 38419135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integrating the microbiome as a resource in the forensics toolkit.
    Clarke TH; Gomez A; Singh H; Nelson KE; Brinkac LM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Sep; 30():141-147. PubMed ID: 28728057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metabarcoding to investigate changes in soil microbial communities within forensic burial contexts.
    Procopio N; Ghignone S; Williams A; Chamberlain A; Mello A; Buckley M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Mar; 39():73-85. PubMed ID: 30594064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revegetation rewilds the soil bacterial microbiome of an old field.
    Gellie NJC; Mills JG; Breed MF; Lowe AJ
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Jun; 26(11):2895-2904. PubMed ID: 28261928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome.
    Bahram M; Hildebrand F; Forslund SK; Anderson JL; Soudzilovskaia NA; Bodegom PM; Bengtsson-Palme J; Anslan S; Coelho LP; Harend H; Huerta-Cepas J; Medema MH; Maltz MR; Mundra S; Olsson PA; Pent M; Põlme S; Sunagawa S; Ryberg M; Tedersoo L; Bork P
    Nature; 2018 Aug; 560(7717):233-237. PubMed ID: 30069051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.