These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31704910)

  • 1. Improved polygenic prediction by Bayesian multiple regression on summary statistics.
    Lloyd-Jones LR; Zeng J; Sidorenko J; Yengo L; Moser G; Kemper KE; Wang H; Zheng Z; Magi R; Esko T; Metspalu A; Wray NR; Goddard ME; Yang J; Visscher PM
    Nat Commun; 2019 Nov; 10(1):5086. PubMed ID: 31704910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incorporating functional priors improves polygenic prediction accuracy in UK Biobank and 23andMe data sets.
    Márquez-Luna C; Gazal S; Loh PR; Kim SS; Furlotte N; Auton A; ; Price AL
    Nat Commun; 2021 Oct; 12(1):6052. PubMed ID: 34663819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fast and accurate Bayesian polygenic risk modeling with variational inference.
    Zabad S; Gravel S; Li Y
    Am J Hum Genet; 2023 May; 110(5):741-761. PubMed ID: 37030289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Leveraging functional genomic annotations and genome coverage to improve polygenic prediction of complex traits within and between ancestries.
    Zheng Z; Liu S; Sidorenko J; Wang Y; Lin T; Yengo L; Turley P; Ani A; Wang R; Nolte IM; Snieder H; ; Yang J; Wray NR; Goddard ME; Visscher PM; Zeng J
    Nat Genet; 2024 May; 56(5):767-777. PubMed ID: 38689000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identity informative SNP associations in the UK Biobank.
    Wendt FR; Novroski NM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():45-48. PubMed ID: 31226582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Leveraging both individual-level genetic data and GWAS summary statistics increases polygenic prediction.
    Albiñana C; Grove J; McGrath JJ; Agerbo E; Wray NR; Bulik CM; Nordentoft M; Hougaard DM; Werge T; Børglum AD; Mortensen PB; Privé F; Vilhjálmsson BJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Jun; 108(6):1001-1011. PubMed ID: 33964208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Making the Most of Clumping and Thresholding for Polygenic Scores.
    Privé F; Vilhjálmsson BJ; Aschard H; Blum MGB
    Am J Hum Genet; 2019 Dec; 105(6):1213-1221. PubMed ID: 31761295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fine mapping and accurate prediction of complex traits using Bayesian Variable Selection models applied to biobank-size data.
    de Los Campos G; Grueneberg A; Funkhouser S; Pérez-Rodríguez P; Samaddar A
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2023 Mar; 31(3):313-320. PubMed ID: 35853950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Polygenic scores via penalized regression on summary statistics.
    Mak TSH; Porsch RM; Choi SW; Zhou X; Sham PC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 41(6):469-480. PubMed ID: 28480976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved genetic prediction of complex traits from individual-level data or summary statistics.
    Zhang Q; Privé F; Vilhjálmsson B; Speed D
    Nat Commun; 2021 Jul; 12(1):4192. PubMed ID: 34234142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving GWAS discovery and genomic prediction accuracy in biobank data.
    Orliac EJ; Trejo Banos D; Ojavee SE; Läll K; Mägi R; Visscher PM; Robinson MR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(31):e2121279119. PubMed ID: 35905320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new method for multiancestry polygenic prediction improves performance across diverse populations.
    Zhang H; Zhan J; Jin J; Zhang J; Lu W; Zhao R; Ahearn TU; Yu Z; O'Connell J; Jiang Y; Chen T; Okuhara D; ; Garcia-Closas M; Lin X; Koelsch BL; Chatterjee N
    Nat Genet; 2023 Oct; 55(10):1757-1768. PubMed ID: 37749244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Selection Operator for Summary Association Statistics Reveals Allelic Heterogeneity of Complex Traits.
    Ning Z; Lee Y; Joshi PK; Wilson JF; Pawitan Y; Shen X
    Am J Hum Genet; 2017 Dec; 101(6):903-912. PubMed ID: 29198721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of polygenic prediction methodology within a reference-standardized framework.
    Pain O; Glanville KP; Hagenaars SP; Selzam S; Fürtjes AE; Gaspar HA; Coleman JRI; Rimfeld K; Breen G; Plomin R; Folkersen L; Lewis CM
    PLoS Genet; 2021 May; 17(5):e1009021. PubMed ID: 33945532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GWIS: Genome-Wide Inferred Statistics for Functions of Multiple Phenotypes.
    Nieuwboer HA; Pool R; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI; Nivard MG
    Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Oct; 99(4):917-927. PubMed ID: 27616482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved Genetic Profiling of Anthropometric Traits Using a Big Data Approach.
    Canela-Xandri O; Rawlik K; Woolliams JA; Tenesa A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0166755. PubMed ID: 27977676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A flexible and parallelizable approach to genome-wide polygenic risk scores.
    Newcombe PJ; Nelson CP; Samani NJ; Dudbridge F
    Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 43(7):730-741. PubMed ID: 31328830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A unified framework for cross-population trait prediction by leveraging the genetic correlation of polygenic traits.
    Cai M; Xiao J; Zhang S; Wan X; Zhao H; Chen G; Yang C
    Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Apr; 108(4):632-655. PubMed ID: 33770506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of polygenic scoring methods in five biobanks shows larger variation between biobanks than methods and finds benefits of ensemble learning.
    Monti R; Eick L; Hudjashov G; Läll K; Kanoni S; Wolford BN; Wingfield B; Pain O; Wharrie S; Jermy B; McMahon A; Hartonen T; Heyne H; Mars N; Lambert S; ; Hveem K; Inouye M; van Heel DA; Mägi R; Marttinen P; Ripatti S; Ganna A; Lippert C
    Am J Hum Genet; 2024 Jul; 111(7):1431-1447. PubMed ID: 38908374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Body mass index stratification optimizes polygenic prediction of type 2 diabetes in cross-biobank analyses.
    Ojima T; Namba S; Suzuki K; Yamamoto K; Sonehara K; Narita A; ; ; Kamatani Y; Tamiya G; Yamamoto M; Yamauchi T; Kadowaki T; Okada Y
    Nat Genet; 2024 Jun; 56(6):1100-1109. PubMed ID: 38862855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.