213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31705670)
1. The relative importance of local and regional processes to metapopulation dynamics.
Dallas TA; Saastamoinen M; Schulz T; Ovaskainen O
J Anim Ecol; 2020 Mar; 89(3):884-896. PubMed ID: 31705670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metapopulation responses to patch connectivity and quality are masked by successional habitat dynamics.
Hodgson JA; Moilanen A; Thomas CD
Ecology; 2009 Jun; 90(6):1608-19. PubMed ID: 19569375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhancing the area-isolation paradigm: habitat heterogeneity and metapopulation dynamics of a rare wetland mammal.
Schooley RL; Branch LC
Ecol Appl; 2009 Oct; 19(7):1708-22. PubMed ID: 19831065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Host-plant availability drives the spatiotemporal dynamics of interacting metapopulations across a fragmented landscape.
Opedal ØH; Ovaskainen O; Saastamoinen M; Laine AL; van Nouhuys S
Ecology; 2020 Dec; 101(12):e03186. PubMed ID: 32892363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term metapopulation study of the Glanville fritillary butterfly (Melitaea cinxia): survey methods, data management, and long-term population trends.
Ojanen SP; Nieminen M; Meyke E; Pöyry J; Hanski I
Ecol Evol; 2013 Oct; 3(11):3713-37. PubMed ID: 24198935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patch definition in metapopulation analysis: a graph theory approach to solve the mega-patch problem.
Cavanaugh KC; Siegel DA; Raimondi PT; Alberto F
Ecology; 2014 Feb; 95(2):316-28. PubMed ID: 24669726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatially structured metapopulation models: global and local assessment of metapopulation capacity.
Ovaskainen O; Hanski I
Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Dec; 60(4):281-302. PubMed ID: 11878830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determinants of extinction-colonization dynamics in Mediterranean butterflies: the role of landscape, climate and local habitat features.
Fernández-Chacón A; Stefanescu C; Genovart M; Nichols JD; Hines JE; Páramo F; Turco M; Oro D
J Anim Ecol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):276-85. PubMed ID: 23957287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metapopulation genetic structure of two coexisting parasitoids of the Glanville fritillary butterfly.
Kankare M; van Nouhuys S; Gaggiotti O; Hanski I
Oecologia; 2005 Mar; 143(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 15586293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Scaling up the effects of inbreeding depression from individuals to metapopulations.
Nonaka E; Sirén J; Somervuo P; Ruokolainen L; Ovaskainen O; Hanski I
J Anim Ecol; 2019 Aug; 88(8):1202-1214. PubMed ID: 31077598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ecological and genetic basis of metapopulation persistence of the Glanville fritillary butterfly in fragmented landscapes.
Hanski I; Schulz T; Wong SC; Ahola V; Ruokolainen A; Ojanen SP
Nat Commun; 2017 Feb; 8():14504. PubMed ID: 28211463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How Do Landscape Structure, Management and Habitat Quality Drive the Colonization of Habitat Patches by the Dryad Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae) in Fragmented Grassland?
Kalarus K; Nowicki P
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138557. PubMed ID: 26375036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relative importance of host plant patch geometry and habitat quality on the patterns of occupancy, extinction and density of the monophagous butterfly Iolana iolas.
Rabasa SG; Gutiérrez D; Escudero A
Oecologia; 2008 Jun; 156(3):491-503. PubMed ID: 18327616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Species traits, patch turnover and successional dynamics: when does intermediate disturbance favour metapopulation occupancy?
Mestre F; Pita R; Mira A; Beja P
BMC Ecol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):2. PubMed ID: 31900154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temperature drives abundance fluctuations, but spatial dynamics is constrained by landscape configuration: Implications for climate-driven range shift in a butterfly.
Fourcade Y; Ranius T; Öckinger E
J Anim Ecol; 2017 Oct; 86(6):1339-1351. PubMed ID: 28796909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Increasing connectivity between metapopulation ecology and landscape ecology.
Howell PE; Muths E; Hossack BR; Sigafus BH; Chandler RB
Ecology; 2018 May; 99(5):1119-1128. PubMed ID: 29453767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metapopulation dynamics in a changing climate: Increasing spatial synchrony in weather conditions drives metapopulation synchrony of a butterfly inhabiting a fragmented landscape.
Kahilainen A; van Nouhuys S; Schulz T; Saastamoinen M
Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Sep; 24(9):4316-4329. PubMed ID: 29682866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metapopulation dynamics in the butterfly Hipparchia semele changed decades before occupancy declined in The Netherlands.
Van Strien AJ; Van Swaay CA; Kéry M
Ecol Appl; 2011 Oct; 21(7):2510-20. PubMed ID: 22073640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictable allele frequency changes due to habitat fragmentation in the Glanville fritillary butterfly.
Fountain T; Nieminen M; Sirén J; Wong SC; Lehtonen R; Hanski I
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Mar; 113(10):2678-83. PubMed ID: 26903642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Connectivity structures local population dynamics: a long-term empirical test in a large metapopulation system.
Castorani MC; Reed DC; Alberto F; Bell TW; Simons RD; Cavanaugh KC; Siegel DA; Raimondi PT
Ecology; 2015 Dec; 96(12):3141-52. PubMed ID: 26909421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
